scholarly journals Rainfall events with shallow landslides in the Entella catchment (Liguria, Northern Italy)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Roccati ◽  
Francesco Faccini ◽  
Fabio Luino ◽  
Laura Turconi ◽  
Fausto Guzzetti

Abstract. In the recent decades, the Entella River basin, in the Liguria Apennines, Northern Italy, was hit by numerous intense rainfall events that triggered shallow landslides, soil slips and debris flows, causing casualties and extensive damage. We analysed landslides information obtained from different sources and rainfall data recorded in the period 2002–2016 by rain gauges scattered in the catchment, to identify the event rainfall duration, D (in h), and rainfall intensity, I (in mm h−1), that presumably caused the landslide events. Rainfall-induced landslides affected all the catchment area, but were most frequent and abundant in the central part, where the three most severe events hit on 24 November 2002, 21–22 October 2013, and 10 November 2014. Examining the timing and location of the failures, we found that the rainfall-induced landslides occurred primarily at the same time or within six hours from the maximum peak rainfall intensity, and at or near the geographical location where the rainfall intensity was largest. Adopting a Frequentist approach, we define the event rainfall intensity–event duration ID, threshold for the possible initiation of shallow landslides and debris flows in the Entella River basin. The threshold is lower than most of the thresholds proposed in the literature for similar mountain catchments, local areas and single regions in Italy. Analysis of the antecedent rainfall conditions for different periods, from 3 to 15 days, revealed that the antecedent rainfall did not play a significant role in the initiation of landslides in the Entella catchment. We expect that our findings will be useful in regional to local landslides early warning systems, and for land-planning aimed at reducing landslides risk in the study area.

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2367-2386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Roccati ◽  
Francesco Faccini ◽  
Fabio Luino ◽  
Laura Turconi ◽  
Fausto Guzzetti

Abstract. In recent decades, the Entella River basin, in the Liguria Apennines, northern Italy, was hit by numerous intense rainfall events that triggered shallow landslides and earth flows, causing casualties and extensive damage. We analyzed landslide information obtained from different sources and rainfall data recorded in the period 2002–2016 by rain gauges scattered throughout the catchment, to identify the event rainfall duration, D (in h), and rainfall intensity, I (in mm h−1), that presumably caused the landslide events. Rainfall-induced landslides affected the whole catchment area, but were most frequent and abundant in the central part, where the three most severe events hit on 23–24 November 2002, 21–22 October 2013 and 10–11 November 2014. Examining the timing and location of the slope failures, we found that the rainfall-induced landslides occurred primarily at the same time or within 6 h from the maximum peak rainfall intensity, and at or near the geographical location where the rainfall intensity was largest. Failures involved mainly forested and natural surfaces, and secondarily cultivated and terraced slopes, with different levels of maintenance. Man-made structures frequently characterize the landslide source areas. Adopting a frequentist approach, we define the event rainfall intensity–event duration (ID) threshold for the possible initiation of shallow landslides and hyper-concentrated flows in the Entella River basin. The threshold is lower than most of the curves proposed in the literature for similar mountain catchments, local areas and single regions in Italy. The result suggests a high susceptibility to rainfall-induced shallow landslides of the Entella catchment due to its high-relief topography, geological and geomorphological settings, meteorological and rainfall conditions, and human interference. Analysis of the antecedent rainfall conditions for different periods, from 3 to 15 days, revealed that the antecedent rainfall did not play a significant role in the initiation of landslides in the Entella catchment. We expect that our findings will be useful in regional to local landslides early warning systems, and for land planning aimed at reducing landslide risk in the study area.


Author(s):  
Dong-Ho Nam ◽  
Suk-Ho Lee ◽  
Byung-Sik Kim

Ongoing climate change causes abnormal climate events worldwide such as increasing temperatures and changing rainfall patterns. With South Korea facing growing damage from the increased frequency of localized heavy rains, the country is not an exception. In particular, its steep slope lands, including mountainous areas, are vulnerable to damage from landslides and debris flows. In addition, localized short-term heavy rains that occur in urban areas with extremely high intensity tend to lead a sharp increase in damage from soil-related disasters and cause huge losses of life and property. Currently, South Korea predicts landslides and debris flows using the standards for forecasting landslides and heavy rains. However, as the forecasting is conducted separately for rainfall intensity and accumulated rainfall, this lacks a technique that reflects both amount and intensity of rainfall in an episode of localized heavy rainfall. This study, therefore, aims to develop such a technique by collecting past cases of debris flow occurrences and rainfall events that accompanied debris flows to calculate the rainfall triggering index (RTI) reflecting accumulated rainfall and rainfall intensity. In addition, the RTI is converted into the critical accumulated rainfall (Rc) to use precipitation information and provide real-time forecasting. The study classifies the standards for flow debris forecasting into three levels: ALERT (10%–50%), WARNING (50%–70%), and EMERGENCY (70% or higher), to provide a nomogram for 6 hr, 12 hr, and 24 hr. As a result of applying this classification into the actual cases of Seoul, Chuncheon, and Cheongju, it is found that about 2–4 hr of response time is secured from the point of the Emergency level to the occurrence of debris flows.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2773-2789
Author(s):  
Jacob Hirschberg ◽  
Alexandre Badoux ◽  
Brian W. McArdell ◽  
Elena Leonarduzzi ◽  
Peter Molnar

Abstract. The prediction of debris flows is relevant because this type of natural hazard can pose a threat to humans and infrastructure. Debris-flow (and landslide) early warning systems often rely on rainfall intensity–duration (ID) thresholds. Multiple competing methods exist for the determination of such ID thresholds but have not been objectively and thoroughly compared at multiple scales, and a validation and uncertainty assessment is often missing in their formulation. As a consequence, updating, interpreting, generalizing and comparing rainfall thresholds is challenging. Using a 17-year record of rainfall and 67 debris flows in a Swiss Alpine catchment (Illgraben), we determined ID thresholds and associated uncertainties as a function of record duration. Furthermore, we compared two methods for rainfall definition based on linear regression and/or true-skill-statistic maximization. The main difference between these approaches and the well-known frequentist method is that non-triggering rainfall events were also considered for obtaining ID-threshold parameters. Depending on the method applied, the ID-threshold parameters and their uncertainties differed significantly. We found that 25 debris flows are sufficient to constrain uncertainties in ID-threshold parameters to ±30 % for our study site. We further demonstrated the change in predictive performance of the two methods if a regional landslide data set with a regional rainfall product was used instead of a local one with local rainfall measurements. Hence, an important finding is that the ideal method for ID-threshold determination depends on the available landslide and rainfall data sets. Furthermore, for the local data set we tested if the ID-threshold performance can be increased by considering other rainfall properties (e.g. antecedent rainfall, maximum intensity) in a multivariate statistical learning algorithm based on decision trees (random forest). The highest predictive power was reached when the peak 30 min rainfall intensity was added to the ID variables, while no improvement was achieved by considering antecedent rainfall for debris-flow predictions in Illgraben. Although the increase in predictive performance with the random forest model over the classical ID threshold was small, such a framework could be valuable for future studies if more predictors are available from measured or modelled data.


Landslides ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Guzzetti ◽  
Silvia Peruccacci ◽  
Mauro Rossi ◽  
Colin P. Stark

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 4913-4931 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Peres ◽  
A. Cancelliere

Abstract. Assessment of landslide-triggering rainfall thresholds is useful for early warning in prone areas. In this paper, it is shown how stochastic rainfall models and hydrological and slope stability physically based models can be advantageously combined in a Monte Carlo simulation framework to generate virtually unlimited-length synthetic rainfall and related slope stability factor of safety data, exploiting the information contained in observed rainfall records and field-measurements of soil hydraulic and geotechnical parameters. The synthetic data set, dichotomized in triggering and non-triggering rainfall events, is analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to derive stochastic-input physically based thresholds that optimize the trade-off between correct and wrong predictions. Moreover, the specific modeling framework implemented in this work, based on hourly analysis, enables one to analyze the uncertainty related to variability of rainfall intensity within events and to past rainfall (antecedent rainfall). A specific focus is dedicated to the widely used power-law rainfall intensity–duration (I–D) thresholds. Results indicate that variability of intensity during rainfall events influences significantly rainfall intensity and duration associated with landslide triggering. Remarkably, when a time-variable rainfall-rate event is considered, the simulated triggering points may be separated with a very good approximation from the non-triggering ones by a I–D power-law equation, while a representation of rainfall as constant–intensity hyetographs globally leads to non-conservative results. This indicates that the I–D power-law equation is adequate to represent the triggering part due to transient infiltration produced by rainfall events of variable intensity and thus gives a physically based justification for this widely used threshold form, which provides results that are valid when landslide occurrence is mostly due to that part. These conditions are more likely to occur in hillslopes of low specific upslope contributing area, relatively high hydraulic conductivity and high critical wetness ratio. Otherwise, rainfall time history occurring before single rainfall events influences landslide triggering, determining whether a threshold based only on rainfall intensity and duration may be sufficient or it needs to be improved by the introduction of antecedent rainfall variables. Further analyses show that predictability of landslides decreases with soil depth, critical wetness ratio and the increase of vertical basal drainage (leakage) that occurs in the presence of a fractured bedrock.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Frattini ◽  
Gianluca Sala ◽  
Camilla Lanfranconi ◽  
Giulia Rusconi ◽  
Giovanni Crosta

<p>Rainfall is one of the most significant triggering factors for shallow landslides. The early warning for such phenomena requires the definition of a threshold based on a critical rainfall condition that may lead to diffuse landsliding. The developing of these thresholds is frequently done through empirical or statistical approaches that aim at identifying thresholds between rainfall events that triggered or non-triggered landslides. Such approaches present several problems related to the identification of the exact amount of rainfall that triggered landslides, the local geo-environmental conditions at the landslide site, and the minimum rainfall amount used to define the non-triggering events. Furthermore, these thresholds lead to misclassifications (false negative or false positive) that always induce costs for the society. The aim of this research is to address these limitations, accounting for classification costs in order to select the optimal thresholds for landslide risk management.</p><p>Starting from a database of shallow landslides occurred during five regional-scale rainfall events in the Italian Central Alps, we extracted the triggering rainfall intensities by adjusting rain gouge data with weather radar data. This adjustment significantly improved the information regarding the rainfall intensity at the landslide site and, although an uncertainty related to the exact timing of occurrence has still remained. Therefore, we identified the rainfall thresholds through the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) approach, by identifying the optimal rainfall intensity that separates triggering and non-triggering events. To evaluate the effect related to the application of different minimum rainfall for non-triggering events, we have adopted three different values obtaining similar results, thus demonstrating that the ROC approach is not sensitive to the choice of the minimum rainfall threshold. In order to include the effect of misclassification costs we have developed cost-sensitive rainfall threshold curves by using cost-curve approach (Drummond and Holte 2000). As far as we know, this is the first attempt to build a cost-sensitive rainfall threshold for landslides that allows to explicitly account for misclassification costs. For the development of the cost-sensitive threshold curve, we had to define a reference cost scenario in which we have quantified several cost items for both missed alarms and false alarms. By using this scenario, the cost-sensitive rainfall threshold results to be lower than the ROC threshold to minimize the missed alarms, the costs of which are seven times greater than the false alarm costs. Since the misclassification costs could vary according to different socio-economic contexts and emergency organization, we developed different extreme scenarios to evaluate the sensitivity of misclassification costs on the rainfall thresholds. In the scenario with maximum false-alarm cost and minimum missed-alarm cost, the rainfall threshold increases in order to minimize the false alarms. Conversely, the rainfall thresholds decreases in the scenario with minimum false-alarm cost and maximum missed-alarm costs. We found that the range of variation between the curves of these extreme scenarios is as much as half an order of magnitude.</p>


Author(s):  
Thom Bogaard ◽  
Roberto Greco

Abstract. The vast majority of shallow landslides and debris flows are precipitation initiated. Therefore, regional landslide hazard assessment is often based on empirically derived precipitation-intensity-duration (PID) thresholds and landslide inventories. Generally, two features of precipitation events are plotted and labelled with (shallow) landslide occurrence or non-occurrence. Hereafter, a separation line or zone is drawn, mostly in logarithmic space. The practical background of PID is that often only meteorological information is available when analyzing (non-) occurrence of shallow landslides and, at the same time, the conceptual idea is that precipitation information is a good proxy for both meteorological trigger and hydrological cause. Although applied in many case studies, this approach suffers from indistinct threshold, many false positives as well as limited physical process understanding. Some first steps towards a more hydrologically based approach have been proposed in the past, but these efforts received limited follow-up. Therefore, the objective of our paper is to: (a) critically analyse the concept of PID thresholds for shallow landslides and debris flows from a hydro-meteorological point of view, and (b) propose a novel trigger-cause conceptual framework for lumped regional hydro-meteorological hazard assessment. We will discuss this based on the published examples and associated discussion. We discuss the PID thresholds in relation to return periods of precipitation, soil physics and slope and catchment water balance. With this paper, we aim to contribute to the development of a stronger conceptual model for regional landslide hazard assessment based on physical process understanding and empirical data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document