scholarly journals About the consistency between Envisat and CryoSat-2 radar freeboard retrieval over Antarctic sea ice

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1415-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Schwegmann ◽  
Eero Rinne ◽  
Robert Ricker ◽  
Stefan Hendricks ◽  
Veit Helm
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Radar Altimeter ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Abstract Knowledge ◽  
Modal Values

Abstract. Knowledge about Antarctic sea-ice volume and its changes over the past decades has been sparse due to the lack of systematic sea-ice thickness measurements in this remote area. Recently, first attempts have been made to develop a sea-ice thickness product over the Southern Ocean from space-borne radar altimetry and results look promising. Today, more than 20 years of radar altimeter data are potentially available for such products. However, the characteristics of individual radar types differ for the available altimeter missions. Hence, it is important and our goal to study the consistency between single sensors in order to develop long and consistent time series. Here, the consistency between freeboard measurements of the Radar Altimeter 2 on board Envisat and freeboard measurements from the Synthetic-Aperture Interferometric Radar Altimeter on board CryoSat-2 is tested for their overlap period in 2011. Results indicate that mean and modal values are in reasonable agreement over the sea-ice growth season (May–October) and partly also beyond. In general, Envisat data show higher freeboards in the first-year ice zone while CryoSat-2 freeboards are higher in the multiyear ice zone and near the coasts. This has consequences for the agreement in individual sectors of the Southern Ocean, where one or the other ice class may dominate. Nevertheless, over the growth season, mean freeboard for the entire (regionally separated) Southern Ocean differs generally by not more than 3 cm (8 cm, with few exceptions) between Envisat and CryoSat-2, and the differences between modal freeboards lie generally within ±10 cm and often even below.

scholarly journals About the consistency between Envisat and CryoSat-2 radar freeboard retrieval over Antarctic sea ice

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 4893-4923 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Schwegmann ◽  
E. Rinne ◽  
R. Ricker ◽  
S. Hendricks ◽  
V. Helm
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Radar Altimeter ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Abstract Knowledge ◽  
Modal Values

Abstract. Knowledge about Antarctic sea-ice volume and its changes over the past decades has been sparse due to the lack of systematic sea-ice thickness measurements in this remote area. Recently, first attempts have been made to develop a sea-ice thickness product over the Southern Ocean from space-borne radar altimetry and results look promising. Today, more than 20 years of radar altimeter data are potentially available for such products. However, data come from different sources, and the characteristics of individual sensors differ. Hence, it is important to study the consistency between single sensors in order to develop long and consistent time series over the potentially available measurement period. Here, the consistency between freeboard measurements of the Radar Altimeter 2 on-board Envisat and freeboard measurements from the Synthetic-Aperture Interferometric Radar Altimeter on-board CryoSat-2 is tested for their overlap period in 2011. Results indicate that mean and modal values are comparable over the sea-ice growth season (May–October) and partly also beyond. In general, Envisat data shows higher freeboards in the seasonal ice zone while CryoSat-2 freeboards are higher in the perennial ice zone and near the coasts. This has consequences for the agreement in individual sectors of the Southern Ocean, where one or the other ice class may dominate. Nevertheless, over the growth season, mean freeboard for the entire (regional separated) Southern Ocean differs generally by not more than 2 cm (5 cm, except for the Amundsen/Bellingshausen Sea) between Envisat and CryoSat-2, and the differences between modal freeboard lie generally within ±10 cm and often even below.

scholarly journals Snow depth uncertainty and its implications on satellite derived Antarctic sea ice thickness

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Price ◽  
Iman Soltanzadeh ◽  
Wolfgang Rack
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Fast Ice

Abstract. Knowledge of the snow depth distribution on Antarctic sea ice is poor but is critical to obtaining sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements of freeboard. We examine the usefulness of various snow products to provide snow depth information over Antarctic fast ice with a focus on a novel approach using a high-resolution numerical snow accumulation model (SnowModel). We compare this model to results from ECMWF ERA-Interim precipitation, EOS Aqua AMSR-E passive microwave snow depths and in situ measurements at the end of the sea ice growth season. The fast ice was segmented into three areas by fastening date and the onset of snow accumulation was calibrated to these dates. SnowModel falls within 0.02 m snow water equivalent (swe) of in situ measurements across the entire study area, but exhibits deviations of 0.05 m swe from these measurements in the east where large topographic features appear to have caused a positive bias in snow depth. AMSR-E provides swe values half that of SnowModel for the majority of the sea ice growth season. The coarser resolution ERA-Interim, not segmented for sea ice freeze up area reveals a mean swe value 0.01 m higher than in situ measurements. These various snow datasets and in situ information are used to infer sea ice thickness in combination with CryoSat-2 (CS-2) freeboard data. CS-2 is capable of capturing the seasonal trend of sea ice freeboard growth but thickness results are highly dependent on the assumptions involved in separating snow and ice freeboard. With various assumptions about the radar penetration into the snow cover, the sea ice thickness estimates vary by up to 2 m. However, we find the best agreement between CS-2 derived and in situ thickness when a radar penetration of 0.05-0.10 m into the snow cover is assumed.

scholarly journals A comparison between Envisat and ICESat sea ice thickness in the Antarctic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfei Wang ◽  
Chao Min ◽  
Robert Ricker ◽  
Qinghua Yang ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Weddell Sea ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Radar Altimeter ◽  
Average Deviation ◽  
Absolute Deviation ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Antarctic

Abstract. The crucial role that Antarctic sea ice plays in the global climate system is strongly linked to its thickness. While in situ observations are too sparse in the Antarctic to determine long-term trends of the Antarctic sea ice thickness on a global scale, satellite radar altimetry data can be applied with a promising prospect. A newly released Envisat-derived product from the European Space Agency Sea Ice Climate Change Initiative (ESA SICCI), including sea ice freeboard and sea ice thickness, covers the entire Antarctic year-round from 2002 to 2012. In this study, the SICCI Envisat sea ice thickness in the Antarctic is firstly compared with a conceptually new proposed ICESat ice thickness that has been derived from an algorithm employing modified ice density. Both data sets have been validated with the Weddell Sea upward looking sonar measurements (ULS), indicating that ICESat agrees better with field observations. The inter-comparisons are conducted for three seasons except winter based on the ICESat operating periods. According to the results, the deviations between Envisat and ICESat sea ice thickness are different considering different seasons, years and regions. More specifically, the smallest average deviation between Envisat and ICESat sea ice thickness exists in spring by −0.03 m while larger deviations exist in summer and autumn by 0.86 m and 0.62 m, respectively. Although the smallest absolute deviation occurs in spring 2005 by 0.02 m, the largest correlation coefficient appears in autumn 2004 by 0.77. The largest positive deviation occurs in the western Weddell Sea by 1.03 m in summer while the largest negative deviation occurs in the Eastern Antarctic by −0.25 m in spring. Potential reasons for those deviations mainly deduce from the limitations of Envisat radar altimeter affected by the weather conditions and the surface roughness as well as the different retrieval algorithms. The better performance in spring of Envisat has a potential relation with relative humidity.

scholarly journals Snow-driven uncertainty in CryoSat-2-derived Antarctic sea ice thickness – insights from McMurdo Sound

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1409-1422
Author(s):  
Daniel Price ◽  
Iman Soltanzadeh ◽  
Wolfgang Rack ◽  
Ethan Dale
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Mcmurdo Sound ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice

Abstract. Knowledge of the snow depth distribution on Antarctic sea ice is poor but is critical to obtaining sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements of the freeboard. We examine the usefulness of various snow products to provide snow depth information over Antarctic fast ice in McMurdo Sound with a focus on a novel approach using a high-resolution numerical snow accumulation model (SnowModel). We compare this model to results from ECMWF ERA-Interim precipitation, EOS Aqua AMSR-E passive microwave snow depths and in situ measurements at the end of the sea ice growth season in 2011. The fast ice was segmented into three areas by fastening date and the onset of snow accumulation was calibrated to these dates. SnowModel captures the spatial snow distribution gradient in McMurdo Sound and falls within 2 cm snow water equivalent (s.w.e) of in situ measurements across the entire study area. However, it exhibits deviations of 5 cm s.w.e. from these measurements in the east where the effect of local topographic features has caused an overestimate of snow depth in the model. AMSR-E provides s.w.e. values half that of SnowModel for the majority of the sea ice growth season. The coarser-resolution ERA-Interim produces a very high mean s.w.e. value 20 cm higher than the in situ measurements. These various snow datasets and in situ information are used to infer sea ice thickness in combination with CryoSat-2 (CS-2) freeboard data. CS-2 is capable of capturing the seasonal trend of sea ice freeboard growth but thickness results are highly dependent on what interface the retracked CS-2 height is assumed to represent. Because of this ambiguity we vary the proportion of ice and snow that represents the freeboard – a mathematical alteration of the radar penetration into the snow cover – and assess this uncertainty in McMurdo Sound. The ranges in sea ice thickness uncertainty within these bounds, as means of the entire growth season, are 1.08, 4.94 and 1.03 m for SnowModel, ERA-Interim and AMSR-E respectively. Using an interpolated in situ snow dataset we find the best agreement between CS-2-derived and in situ thickness when this interface is assumed to be 0.07 m below the snow surface.

Estimating the thickness of ridged sea ice from ship observations in the Ross Sea

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
TINA TIN ◽  
MARTIN O. JEFFRIES ◽  
MIKKO LENSU ◽  
JUKKA TUHKURI
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ross Sea ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Equivalent Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Original Formula

Ship-based observations of sea ice thickness using the Antarctic Sea Ice Processes and Climate (ASPeCt) protocol provide information on ice thickness distribution at relatively low cost. This protocol uses a simple formula to calculate the mass of ice in ridges based on surface observations. We present two new formulae and compare these with results from the “Original” formula using data obtained in the Ross Sea in autumn and winter. The new “r-star” formula uses a more realistic ratio of sail and keel areas to transform dimensions of sails to estimates of mean keel areas. As a result, estimates of “equivalent thickness” (i.e. mean thickness of ice in ridged areas) increased by over 200%. The new “Probability” formula goes one step further, by incorporating the probability that a sail is associated with a keel underwater, and the probability that keels may be found under level surfaces. This resulted in estimates of equivalent thickness comparable with the Original formula. Estimates of equivalent thickness at one or two degree latitude resolution are sufficiently accurate for validating sea ice models. Although ridges are small features in the Ross Sea, we have shown that they constitute a significant fraction of the total ice mass.

scholarly journals Seasonal changes of sea-ice characteristics off East Antarctica

1994 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Allison ◽  
Anthony Worby
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Cores ◽  
Open Water ◽  
Ice Formation ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Ice Growth ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Edge

Data on Antarctic sea‐ice characteristics, and their spatial and temporal variability, are presented from cruises between 1986 and 1993 for the region spanning 60°−150° E between October and May. In spring, the sea‐ice zone is a variable mixture of different thicknesses of ice plus open water and in some regions only 30−40% of the area is covered with ice >0.3 m thick. The thin‐ice and open‐water areas are important for air‐sea heat exchange. Crystallographic analyses of ice cores, supported by salinity and stable‐isotope measurements, show that approximately 50% of the ice mass is composed of small frazil crystals. These are formed by rapid ice growth in leads and polynyas and indicate the presence of open water throughout the growth season. The area‐averaged thickness of undeformed ice west of 120° E is typically less than 0.3 m and tends to‐increase with distance south of the ice edge. Ice growth by congelation freezing rarely exceeds 0.4 m, with increases in ice thickness beyond this mostly attributable to rafting and ridging. While most of the total area is thin ice or open water, in the central pack much of the total ice mass is contained in ridges. Taking account of the extent of ridging, the total area‐averaged ice thickness is estimated to be about 1m for the region 60°−90° E and 2 m for the region 120°−150° E. By December, new ice formation has ceased in all areas of the pack and only floes >0.3 m remain. In most regions these melt completely over the summer and the new season's ice formation starts in late February. By March, the thin ice has reached a thickness of 0.15 0.30 m, with nilas formation being an important mechanism for ice growth within the ice edge

Data-derived spatial-resolution errors of Antarctic sea-ice thickness

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary D. Stampone ◽  
Cathleen A. Geiger ◽  
Tracy L. DeLiberty ◽  
E. Rachel Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice

scholarly journals Seasonal prediction and predictability of regional Antarctic sea ice

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-68
Author(s):  
Mitchell Bushuk ◽  
Michael Winton ◽  
F. Alexander Haumann ◽  
Thomas Delworth ◽  
Feiyu Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Seasonal Prediction ◽  
Prediction Skill ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice

AbstractCompared to the Arctic, seasonal predictions of Antarctic sea ice have received relatively little attention. In this work, we utilize three coupled dynamical prediction systems developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory to assess the seasonal prediction skill and predictability of Antarctic sea ice. These systems, based on the FLOR, SPEAR_LO, and SPEAR_MED dynamical models, differ in their coupled model components, initialization techniques, atmospheric resolution, and model biases. Using suites of retrospective initialized seasonal predictions spanning 1992–2018, we investigate the role of these factors in determining Antarctic sea ice prediction skill and examine the mechanisms of regional sea ice predictability. We find that each system is capable of skillfully predicting regional Antarctic sea ice extent (SIE) with skill that exceeds a persistence forecast. Winter SIE is skillfully predicted 11 months in advance in the Weddell, Amundsen and Bellingshausen, Indian, and West Pacific sectors, whereas winter skill is notably lower in the Ross sector. Zonally advected upper ocean heat content anomalies are found to provide the crucial source of prediction skill for the winter sea ice edge position. The recently-developed SPEAR systems are more skillful than FLOR for summer sea ice predictions, owing to improvements in sea ice concentration and sea ice thickness initialization. Summer Weddell SIE is skillfully predicted up to 9 months in advance in SPEAR_MED, due to the persistence and drift of initialized sea ice thickness anomalies from the previous winter. Overall, these results suggest a promising potential for providing operational Antarctic sea ice predictions on seasonal timescales.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document