Implications of surface flooding on airborne estimates of snow depth on sea ice

Abstract. Snow depth observations from airborne snow radars, such as the NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) mission, have recently been used in altimeter-derived sea ice thickness estimates, as well as for model parameterization. A number of validation studies comparing airborne and in situ snow depth measurements have been conducted in the western Arctic Ocean, demonstrating the utility of the airborne data. However, there have been no validation studies in the Atlantic sector of the Arctic. Recent observations in this region suggest a significant and predominant shift towards a snow-ice regime caused by deep snow on thin sea ice. During the Norwegian young sea Ice, Climate and Ecosystems (ICE) expedition (N-ICE2015) in the area north of Svalbard, a validation study was conducted on 19 March 2015. This study collected ground truth data during an OIB overflight. Snow and ice thickness measurements were obtained across a two-dimensional (2-D) 400 m × 60 m grid. Additional snow and ice thickness measurements collected in situ from adjacent ice floes helped to place the measurements obtained at the gridded survey field site into a more regional context. Widespread negative freeboards and flooding of the snowpack were observed during the N-ICE2015 expedition due to the general situation of thick snow on relatively thin sea ice. These conditions caused brine wicking into and saturation of the basal snow layers. This causes the airborne radar signal to undergo more diffuse scattering, resulting in the location of the radar main scattering horizon being detected well above the snow–ice interface. This leads to a subsequent underestimation of snow depth; if only radar-based information is used, the average airborne snow depth was 0.16 m thinner than that measured in situ at the 2-D survey field. Regional data within 10 km of the 2-D survey field suggested however a smaller deviation between average airborne and in situ snow depth, a 0.06 m underestimate in snow depth by the airborne radar, which is close to the resolution limit of the OIB snow radar system. Our results also show a broad snow depth distribution, indicating a large spatial variability in snow across the region. Differences between the airborne snow radar and in situ measurements fell within the standard deviation of the in situ data (0.15–0.18 m). Our results suggest that seawater flooding of the snow–ice interface leads to underestimations of snow depth or overestimations of sea ice freeboard measured from radar altimetry, in turn impacting the accuracy of sea ice thickness estimates.

Download Full-text

Implications of surface flooding on airborne thickness measurements of snow on sea ice

10.5194/tc-2020-168 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Anja Rösel ◽

Sinead Louise Farrell ◽

Vishnu Nandan ◽

Jaqueline Richter-Menge ◽

Gunnar Spreen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Validation Studies ◽

The Arctic ◽

Airborne Radar ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Thickness Measurements ◽

Snow Thickness ◽

Snow And Ice

Abstract. Snow thickness observations from airborne snow radars, such as the NASA’s Operation IceBridge (OIB) mission, have recently been used in altimeter-derived sea ice thickness estimates, as well as for model parameterization. A number of validation studies comparing airborne and in situ snow thickness measurements have been conducted in the western Arctic Ocean, demonstrating the utility of the airborne data. However, there have been no validation studies in the Atlantic sector of the Arctic. Recent observations in this region suggest a significant and predominant shift towards a snow-ice regime, caused by deep snow on thin sea ice. During the Norwegian young sea ICE expedition (N-ICE2015) in the area north of Svalbard, a validation study was conducted on March 19, 2015, during which ground truth data were collected during an OIB overflight. Snow and ice thickness measurements were obtained across a two dimensional (2-D) 400 m × 60 m grid. Additional snow and ice thickness measurements collected in situ from adjacent ice floes helped to place the measurements obtained at the gridded survey field site into a more regional context. Widespread negative freeboards and flooding of the snow pack were observed during the N-ICE2015 expedition, due to the general situation of thick snow on relatively thin sea ice. These conditions caused brine wicking and saturation into the basal snow layers, causing more diffuse scattering and influenced the airborne radar signal to detect the radar main scattering horizon well above the snow/sea ice interface, resulting in a subsequent underestimation of total snow thickness, if only radar-based information is used. The average airborne snow thickness was 0.16 m thinner than that measured in situ at the 2-D survey field. Regional data within 10 km of the 2-D survey field suggested however a smaller deviation between average airborne and in situ snow thickness, a 0.06 m underestimate in snow thickness by the airborne radar, which is close to the resolution limit of the OIB snow radar system. Our results also show a broad snow thickness distribution, indicating a large spatial variability in snow across the region. Differences between the airborne snow radar and in situ measurements fell within the standard deviation of the in situ data (0.15–0.18 m). Our results suggest that, with frequent flooding of the snow-ice interface in specific regions of the Arctic in the future, it may result in an underestimate of snow thickness or an overestimate of ice freeboard, measured from radar altimetry, thereby affecting the accuracy of sea ice thickness estimates.

Download Full-text

Using CloudSat snowfall rate observations to constrain and characterize the uncertainties of Arctic snow-on-sea-ice

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11436 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alex Cabaj ◽

Paul Kushner ◽

Alek Petty ◽

Stephen Howell ◽

Christopher Fletcher

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Ice Model

Snow on Arctic sea ice plays multiple&#8212;and sometimes contrasting&#8212;roles in several feedbacks between sea ice and the global climate system. For example, the presence of snow on sea ice may mitigate sea ice melt by increasing the sea ice albedo and enhancing the ice-albedo feedback. Conversely, snow can inhibit sea ice growth by insulating the ice from the atmosphere during the sea ice growth season. In addition to its contribution to sea ice feedbacks, snow on sea ice also poses a challenge for sea ice observations. In particular, snow contributes to uncertainties in retrievals of sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements, such as those from ICESat-2. Snow-on-sea-ice models can produce basin-wide snow depth estimates, but these models require snowfall input from reanalysis products. In-situ snowfall measurements are absent over most of the Arctic Ocean, so it can be difficult to determine which reanalysis snowfall product is best suited to be used as input for a snow-on-sea-ice model.In the absence of in-situ snowfall rate measurements, measurements from satellite instruments can be used to quantify snowfall over the Arctic Ocean. The CloudSat satellite, which is equipped with a 94 GHz Cloud Profiling Radar instrument, measures vertical radar reflectivity profiles from which snowfall rates can be retrieved. This instrument provides the most extensive high-latitude snowfall rate observation dataset currently available. CloudSat&#8217;s near-polar orbit enables it to make measurements at latitudes up to 82&#176;N, with a 16-day repeat cycle, over the time period from 2006-2016.We present a calibration of reanalysis snowfall to CloudSat observations over the Arctic Ocean, which we then apply to reanalysis snowfall input for the NASA Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM). This calibration reduces the spread in snow depths produced by NESOSIM when different reanalysis inputs are used. In light of this calibration, we revise the NESOSIM parametrizations of wind-driven snow processes, and we characterize the uncertainties in NESOSIM-generated snow depths resulting from uncertainties in snowfall input. We then extend this analysis further to estimate the resulting uncertainties in sea ice thickness retrieved from ICESat-2 when snow depth estimates from NESOSIM are used as input for the retrieval.

Download Full-text

Snow-depth observations by adventurers traveling on Arctic sea ice

Annals of Glaciology ◽

10.3189/172756411795931552 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 52 (57) ◽

pp. 369-376 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Sebastian Gerland ◽

Christian Haas

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Basin ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Snow Thickness ◽

Snow And Ice

AbstractSnow depth is a key parameter for assessing the sea-ice mass budget in the Arctic and for the surface energy balance at the atmosphere–snow–ice–ocean interfaces. However, scientific expeditions to the high Arctic Ocean are rare, and for large parts of the year no snow and ice data are collected in situ in most regions. Therefore any additional in situ observations of snow depth are of interest to the scientific community. Arctic adventurers and tourists are among the most frequent visitors to the Arctic Ocean and North Pole. If properly trained and carefully adhering to standard protocols, they could collect valuable snow-depth data from large regions. Here we analyse such data from four Arctic basin ski traverses carried out between 1994 and 2007. Individual datasets show characteristic regional differences of snow thickness, which provide invaluable information for the validation of models and satellite data. the observations were made applying a continuously upgraded observation guideline scheme. Earlier observations were based on a relatively broad view of easily observable snow and ice parameters. Improvements included requirements of more detailed snow-thickness surveys in order to observe the spatial variability over varying sea-ice surfaces in a better way. Possibilities for, and limitations of, ice-thickness estimates and measurements are also discussed. Often, assessment of ice thickness is more problematic since measurements are either time-consuming or biased, meaning that possibilities for collecting large datasets are limited.

Download Full-text

The implications of selected processing methods on satellite altimetry derived sea ice thickness state and trends in the seasonal ice zone

10.5194/egusphere-egu21-12240 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Isolde Glissenaar ◽

Jack Landy ◽

Alek Petty ◽

Nathan Kurtz ◽

Julienne Stroeve

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Satellite Altimetry ◽

Region Of Interest ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Baffin Bay ◽

The Impact

The ice cover of the Arctic Ocean is increasingly becoming dominated by seasonal sea ice. It is important to focus on the processing of altimetry ice thickness data in thinner seasonal ice regions to understand seasonal sea ice behaviour better. This study focusses on Baffin Bay as a region of interest to study seasonal ice behaviour.We aim to reconcile the spring sea ice thickness derived from multiple satellite altimetry sensors and sea ice charts in Baffin Bay and produce a robust long-term record (2003-2020) for analysing trends in sea ice thickness. We investigate the impact of choosing different snow depth products (the Warren climatology, a passive microwave snow depth product and modelled snow depth from reanalysis data) and snow redistribution methods (a sigmoidal function and an empirical piecewise function) to retrieve sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry sea ice freeboard data.The choice of snow depth product and redistribution method results in an uncertainty envelope around the March mean sea ice thickness in Baffin Bay of 10%. Moreover, the sea ice thickness trend ranges from -15 cm/dec to 20 cm/dec depending on the applied snow depth product and redistribution method. Previous studies have shown a possible long-term asymmetrical trend in sea ice thinning in Baffin Bay. The present study shows that whether a significant long-term asymmetrical trend was found depends on the choice of snow depth product and redistribution method. The satellite altimetry sea ice thickness results with different snow depth products and snow redistribution methods show that different processing techniques can lead to different results and can influence conclusions on total and spatial sea ice thickness trends. Further processing work on the historic radar altimetry record is needed to create reliable sea ice thickness products in the marginal ice zone.

Download Full-text

Winter Arctic sea ice freeboard, snow depth and thickness variability from ICESat-2 and NESOSIM

10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13779 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Alek Petty ◽

Nicole Keeney ◽

Alex Cabaj ◽

Paul Kushner ◽

Nathan Kurtz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Ice Cloud ◽

Ice Drift ◽

Thickness Variability ◽

Arctic Ice

<div> <div> <div> <div> National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite&#8208; 2 (ICESat&#8208;2) mission was launched in September 2018 and is now providing routine, very high&#8208;resolution estimates of surface height/type (the ATL07 product) and freeboard (the ATL10 product) across the Arctic and Southern Oceans. In recent work we used snow depth and density estimates from the NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM) together with ATL10 freeboard data to estimate sea ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean. Here we provide an overview of updates made to both the underlying ATL10 freeboard product and the NESOSIM model, and the subsequent impacts on our estimates of sea ice thickness including updated comparisons to the original ICESat mission and ESA&#8217;s CryoSat-2. Finally we compare our Arctic ice thickness estimates from the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 winters and discuss possible causes of these differences based on an analysis of atmospheric data (ERA5), ice drift (NSIDC) and ice type (OSI SAF). </div> </div> </div> </div>

Download Full-text

Sea Ice Enhancements to Polar WRF*

Monthly Weather Review ◽

10.1175/mwr-d-14-00344.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 143 (6) ◽

pp. 2363-2385 ◽

Cited By ~ 40

Author(s):

Keith M. Hines ◽

David H. Bromwich ◽

Lesheng Bai ◽

Cecilia M. Bitz ◽

Jordan G. Powers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Surface Model ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Near Surface ◽

The Arctic Ocean

Abstract The Polar Weather Research and Forecasting Model (Polar WRF), a polar-optimized version of the WRF Model, is developed and made available to the community by Ohio State University’s Polar Meteorology Group (PMG) as a code supplement to the WRF release from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While annual NCAR official releases contain polar modifications, the PMG provides very recent updates to users. PMG supplement versions up to WRF version 3.4 include modified Noah land surface model sea ice representation, allowing the specification of variable sea ice thickness and snow depth over sea ice rather than the default 3-m thickness and 0.05-m snow depth. Starting with WRF V3.5, these options are implemented by NCAR into the standard WRF release. Gridded distributions of Arctic ice thickness and snow depth over sea ice have recently become available. Their impacts are tested with PMG’s WRF V3.5-based Polar WRF in two case studies. First, 20-km-resolution model results for January 1998 are compared with observations during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean project. Polar WRF using analyzed thickness and snow depth fields appears to simulate January 1998 slightly better than WRF without polar settings selected. Sensitivity tests show that the simulated impacts of realistic variability in sea ice thickness and snow depth on near-surface temperature is several degrees. The 40-km resolution simulations of a second case study covering Europe and the Arctic Ocean demonstrate remote impacts of Arctic sea ice thickness on midlatitude synoptic meteorology that develop within 2 weeks during a winter 2012 blocking event.

Download Full-text

Snow depth uncertainty and its implications on satellite derived Antarctic sea ice thickness

10.5194/tc-2018-92 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Daniel Price ◽

Iman Soltanzadeh ◽

Wolfgang Rack

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Snow Accumulation ◽

In Situ Measurements ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Growth Season ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Antarctic Sea Ice ◽

Fast Ice

Abstract. Knowledge of the snow depth distribution on Antarctic sea ice is poor but is critical to obtaining sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements of freeboard. We examine the usefulness of various snow products to provide snow depth information over Antarctic fast ice with a focus on a novel approach using a high-resolution numerical snow accumulation model (SnowModel). We compare this model to results from ECMWF ERA-Interim precipitation, EOS Aqua AMSR-E passive microwave snow depths and in situ measurements at the end of the sea ice growth season. The fast ice was segmented into three areas by fastening date and the onset of snow accumulation was calibrated to these dates. SnowModel falls within 0.02 m snow water equivalent (swe) of in situ measurements across the entire study area, but exhibits deviations of 0.05 m swe from these measurements in the east where large topographic features appear to have caused a positive bias in snow depth. AMSR-E provides swe values half that of SnowModel for the majority of the sea ice growth season. The coarser resolution ERA-Interim, not segmented for sea ice freeze up area reveals a mean swe value 0.01 m higher than in situ measurements. These various snow datasets and in situ information are used to infer sea ice thickness in combination with CryoSat-2 (CS-2) freeboard data. CS-2 is capable of capturing the seasonal trend of sea ice freeboard growth but thickness results are highly dependent on the assumptions involved in separating snow and ice freeboard. With various assumptions about the radar penetration into the snow cover, the sea ice thickness estimates vary by up to 2 m. However, we find the best agreement between CS-2 derived and in situ thickness when a radar penetration of 0.05-0.10 m into the snow cover is assumed.

Download Full-text

Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis: Impact of Sea Ice Thickness, Freeboard, and Snow Depth Products on Sea Ice Forecast Performance

10.5194/tc-2017-249 ◽

2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Thomas Kaminski ◽

Frank Kauker ◽

Leif Toudal Pedersen ◽

Michael Voßbeck ◽

Helmuth Haak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

High Accuracy ◽

Added Value ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Performance Gain ◽

Benefit Analysis ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Forecast Performance

Abstract. Assimilation of remote sensing products of sea ice thickness (SIT) into sea ice-ocean models has been shown to improve the quality of sea ice forecasts. Open questions are whether the assimilation of rawer products such as radar freeboard (RFB) can achieve yet a better performance and what performance gain can be achieved by the joint assimilation with a snow depth product. The Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis (ArcMBA) system was developed to address this type of question. Using the quantitative network design (QND) approach, the system can evaluate, in a mathematically rigorous fashion, the observational constraints imposed by individual and groups of data products. We present assessments of the observation impact (added value) in terms of the uncertainty reduction in a four-week forecast of sea ice volume (SIV) and snow volume (SNV) for three regions along the Northern Sea Route by a coupled model of the sea ice-ocean system. The assessments cover seven satellite products, three real products and four hypothetical products. The real products are monthly SIT, sea ice freeboard (SIFB), and RFB, all derived from CryoSat-2 by the Alfred Wegener Institute. These are complemented by two hypothetical monthly laser freeboard (LFB) products (one with low accuracy and one with high accuracy), as well as two hypothetical monthly snow depth products (again one with low accuracy and one with high accuracy). On the basis of the per-pixel uncertainty ranges that are provided with the CryoSat-2 SIT, SIFB, and RFB products, the SIT achieves a much better performance for SIV than the SIFB product, while the performance of RFB is more similar to that of SIT. For SNV, the performance of SIT is only low, the performance of SIFB higher and the performance of RFB yet higher. A hypothetical LFB product with low accuracy (20 cm uncertainty) lies in performance between SIFB and RFB for both SIV and SNV. A reduction in the uncertainty of the LFB product to 2 cm yields a significant increase in performance. Combining either of the SIT/freeboard products with a hypothetical snow depth product achieves a significant performance increase. The uncertainty in the snow product matters: A higher accuracy product achieves an extra performance gain. The provision of spatial and temporal uncertainty correlations with the EO products would be beneficial not only for QND assessments, but also for assimilation of the products.

Download Full-text

Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office’s Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)

10.5194/tc-2021-127 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Emma Kathleen Fiedler ◽

Matthew Martin ◽

Ed Blockley ◽

Davi Mignac ◽

Nicolas Fournier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Sampling Error ◽

Mean Difference ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Concentration ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Along Track ◽

Assimilation Model

Abstract. The feasibility of assimilating SIT (sea ice thickness) observations derived from CryoSat-2 along-track measurements of sea ice freeboard is successfully demonstrated using a 3D-Var assimilation scheme, NEMOVAR, within the Met Office’s global, coupled ocean-sea ice model, FOAM (Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model). The Arctic freeboard measurements are produced by CPOM (Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling) and are converted to SIT within FOAM using modelled snow depth. This is the first time along-track observations of SIT have been used in this way, with other centres assimilating gridded and temporally-averaged observations. The assimilation greatly improves the SIT analysis and forecast fields generated by FOAM, particularly in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic-wide observation-minus-background assimilation statistics show improvements of 0.75 m mean difference and 0.41 m RMSD (root-mean-square difference) in the freeze-up period, and 0.46 m mean difference and 0.33 m RMSD in the ice break-up period, for 2015–2017. Validation of the SIT analysis against independent springtime in situ SIT observations from NASA Operation IceBridge shows improvement in the SIT analysis of 0.61 m mean difference (0.42 m RMSD) compared to a control without SIT assimilation. Similar improvements are seen in the FOAM 5-day SIT forecast. Validation of the SIT assimilation with independent BGEP (Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project) sea ice draft observations does not show an improvement, since the assimilated CryoSat-2 observations compare similarly to the model without assimilation in this region. Comparison with Air-EM (airborne electromagnetic induction) combined measurements of SIT and snow depth shows poorer results for the assimilation compared to the control, which may be evidence of noise in the SIT analysis, sampling error, or uncertainties in the modelled snow depth, the assimilated observations, or the validation observations themselves. The SIT analysis could be improved by upgrading the observation uncertainties used in the assimilation. Despite the lack of CryoSat-2 SIT observations over the summer due to the effect of meltponds on retrievals, it is shown that the model is able to retain improvements to the SIT field throughout the summer months, due to previous SIT assimilation. This also leads to regional improvements in the July SIC (sea ice concentration) of 5 % RMSD in the European sector, due to slower melt of the thicker modelled sea ice.

Download Full-text

Optimizing Observations of Sea Ice Thickness and Snow Depth in the Arctic

10.21236/ada601070 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Jacqueline A. Richter-Menge ◽

Sinead L. Farrell

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness

Download Full-text