Heterogeneous spatial and temporal pattern of surface elevation change and mass balance of the Patagonian icefields between 2000 and 2016
Abstract. The Northern and Southern Patagonian icefields (NPI and SPI) have been subject to accelerated retreat during the last decades with considerable variability in magnitude and timing among individual glaciers. We derive spatially detailed maps of surface elevation change (SEC) of NPI and SPI from bistatic SAR interferometry data of SRTM and TanDEM-X for two epochs, 2000–2012 and 2012–2016 and provide data on changes in surface elevation and ice volume for the individual glaciers and for the icefields at large. We apply advanced TanDEM-X processing techniques allowing to cover 90 % and 95 % of the area of NPI and 97 % and 98 % of the area of SPI for the two epochs, respectively. Particular attention is paid to precisely coregistering the DEMs, assessing and accounting for possible effects of radar signal penetration through backscatter analysis, and correcting for seasonality biases in case of deviations in repeat DEM coverage from full annual time spans. The results show a different temporal trend between the two icefields and reveal a heterogeneous spatial pattern of SEC and mass balance caused by different sensitivities in respect to direct climatic forcing and ice flow dynamics of individual glaciers. The estimated volume change rates for NPI are −4.26 ± 0.20 km3 a−1 for epoch 1 and −5.60 ± 0.71 km3 a−1 for epoch 2, while for SPI these are −14.87 ± 0.51 km3 a−1 for epoch 1 and −11.86 ± 1.90 km3 a−1 for epoch 2. This amounts to 0.047 ± 0.005 mm a−1 eustatic sea level rise for both icefields during the epoch 2000–2016. On SPI the spatial pattern of surface elevation change is more complex than on NPI and the temporal trend is less uniform. On terminus sections of the main calving glaciers of SPI temporal variations of flow velocities are a main factor for differences in SEC between the two epochs. Striking differences are observed even on adjoining glaciers, such as Upsala Glacier with decreasing mass losses associated with slowdown of flow velocity between the two epochs, contrasting with acceleration and increase of mass losses on Viedma Glacier.