scholarly journals Design It! Design Engineering in After School Programs (2002), and Explore It! Science Investigations in Out-of-School Programs (2006)

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Phillipa Myers

Science programming can be daunting for after school educators and para-educators. These two resources insure science is fun for both youth and educators! Design It! Design Engineering in After School Programs (2002), and Explore It! Science Investigations in Out-of-School Programs (2006) encourage the love of science learning through an exploratory format that is grounded in cooperative learning. Each of the two programs contain multiple projects using readily available and affordable materials. Design It! includes project topics such as Gliders, Spinning Toys, and Trebuchets. Explore It! includes project topics such as Wiring a House, Soda Science, and Balancing Toys.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kolbrún Þ. Pálsdóttir

This article discusses a) the institutional development of out-of-school services for schoolaged children in Reykjavik, Iceland and b) provides some insight into how the children themselves experience the difference between after-school and school. The status of out of-school programs in the school system is weak and receives scarce attention from researchers and policy makers. In Iceland, there is no clear framework for the service and lack of policy concerning quality and control of the service. Together school and after-school centre frame children’s institutional lives in their first years in elementary school. For many children, participationin after-school centre is a positive experience which provides opportunity to play and to be with friends. Children seldom get the chance to decide what they do in school. I argue that after-school programs should be considered an integral part of the educational system and thus, further development of the professional underpinnings of such services are necessary.


2021 ◽  
pp. 001312452110045
Author(s):  
Susan K. Klumpner ◽  
Michael E. Woolley

After school programs provide low income students and students of color with learning opportunities across both academic and non-academic domains that such students would otherwise not get. In this study, we examined the intersection of school characteristics (e.g., enrollment size, percent minority enrolled, and percent eligible for FARM) and the types of after school programming schools offered (e.g., fee-based, 21st CCLC, and other types) using binary logistic regression models. I n a sample of schools ( n = 1,601) surveyed by the National Center on Education Statistics 2008 FRSS, we found that under-resourced schools had lower odds of having a 21st CCLC program and higher odds of having a fee-based after school program (than schools with a lower percentage of students receiving FARM). That is counter to the stated goals of the 21st CCLC program. These findings highlight the need for a re-prioritization of 21st CCLC funding such that financial assistance provided to schools to support after school programs is allocated to schools serving students from low income families and communities.


Author(s):  
Melissa K. Levy ◽  
Brenda Abanavas ◽  
Gail Breslow ◽  
Gregg Croteau ◽  
Erin Harris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document