Scientometric Portrait of Professor K. Byrappa: Scientist of High Repute

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
N. Kavitha ◽  
M. Chandrashekara
Keyword(s):  
Role Model ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Scholarly Research ◽  
Early Date ◽  
H Index ◽  
Research Publications

The present study attempted to explore and analyze various attributes of research publications of Prof.K.Byrappa, a renowned Indian academician and researcher. The data used in the study have covered from K. Byrappa’s early date of publication to 13th January 2020, indexed in Google Scholar. A total number of 378 articles have been retrieved from Google Scholar for the said period. His h-index is 31 and received 7774 citations for his scholarly research work. In this study, an attempt has been made to highlight the profile and publications of Prof. K. Byrappa as a role model for future researchers and academicians.

Mapping of Research in Agricultural Scientist’s Citation Analysis in Google Scholar, Scopus and Publons

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
M. Sankar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
End User ◽  
H Index ◽  
Innovative Idea ◽  
User Groups ◽  
Number Of Citations

An innovative idea developed by the researchers should reach the end user groups. The output of any researcher can be judged in terms of patents or his publications in the respective fields. Quality and impact of research work can be based on the citation and h index. Nowadays, there are several parameters considered for evaluating the performance of the research. Citation and h index are the quality parameters used for rating the originality and use of research. They are more useful for accessing the potentials of research as well as for providing a platform for collaborative projects at national / International levels. This paper presents the comparative analysis of citation and h index for identified researcher through three popular databases viz., Google Scholar, Scopus, and Publons. Among the three databases, Google Scholar showed a higher number of citations of the selected author due to data collected from unauthenticated documents as well as well established research databases.

Publishing patterns and citation performance of manuscripts relating to paediatric cardiology and congenital heart disease: comparison of paediatric and adult cardiology journals

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Rohit S. Loomba ◽  
Danielle Sheikholeslami ◽  
Aaron Dyson ◽  
Saul Flores ◽  
Enrique Villarreal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lower Number ◽  
The Other ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index ◽  
Paediatric Cardiology ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background: Manuscripts pertaining to paediatric cardiology and CHD have been published in a variety of different journals. Some of these journals are journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology, while others are focused on adult cardiology. Historically, it has been considered that manuscripts published in journals devoted to adult cardiology have greater citation potential. Our objective was to compare citation performance between manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and CHD published in paediatric as opposed to adult cardiology journals. Methods: We identified manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and CHD published in five journals of interest during 2014. Of these journals, two were primarily concerned with adult cardiology, while the other three focused on paediatric cardiology. The number of citations for these identified manuscripts was gathered from Google Scholar. We compared the number of citations (median, mean, and 25th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles), the potential for citation, and the h-index for the identified manuscripts. Results: We identified a total of 828 manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and congenital heart as published in the 5 journals during 2014. Of these, 783 (95%) were published in journals focused on paediatric cardiology, and the remaining 45 (5%) were published in journals focused on adult cardiology. The median number of citations was 41 in the manuscripts published in the journals focused on adult cardiology, as opposed to 7 in journals focused on paediatric cardiology (p < 0.001). The h-index, however, was greater for the journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology (36 versus 27). Conclusion: Approximately one-twentieth of the work relating to paediatric cardiology and CHD is published in journals that focus predominantly on adult cardiology. The median number of citations is greater when manuscripts concerning paediatric cardiology and CHD are published in these journals focused on adult cardiology. The h-index, however, is higher when the manuscripts are published in journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology. While such publications in journals that focus on adult cardiology tend to generate a greater number of citations than those achieved for works published in specialised paediatric cardiology journals, the potential for citation is no different between the journals. Due to the drastically lower number of manuscripts published in journals dedicated to adult cardiology, however, median performance is different.

scholarly journals Qualitative Assessment of Research done at Two Premier Medical Institutes in India: Some Data for Introspection

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-33
Author(s):  
KLN Rao ◽  
Ravi Prakash Kanojia ◽  
Kirti Kumar Rathod
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Research ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Index Number ◽  
H Index ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Outcome Utility

ABSTRACT Aim To perform a qualitative assessment of research publications coming from two premier medical institutes in India. Materials and methods Research publications from AIIMS and PGIMER published during 2004 to 2008 were analyzed. The publications were categorized into five types. A year-wise analysis was done for both the institutes. Data was obtained from Scopus. The collected data included the number of papers published in a category, total citations received by a type of publication in a year, number of publications which have no citations, number of publications with only one citation, h-index, number of zero and only one citation were added to get publications with negligible citations. Results A total number of 4,828 and 2,882 research publications were analyzed from AIIMS and PGIMER respectively. The original articles attracted highest no of citations that is 64 and 66% of the total citations in a year for AIIMS and PGIMER respectively. Approximately 37 to 42% of the original articles get negligible citations. The h-index for various categories of article was higher for the original articles (18/13), whereas it was very low for other category of research publications. Conclusion The original articles fetch more citations in long run. Close to 40% of the original research done in the studied institutes get negligible citations pointing toward their outcome utility and quality. More than 60% of the minor category publications remain uncited. This sort of data if periodically obtained should serve as a benchmark for quality analysis of scientific research. How to cite this article Kanojia RP, Rathod KK, Rao KLN. Qualitative Assessment of Research done at Two Premier Medical Institutes in India: Some Data for Introspection. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012;46(1):24-33.

scholarly journals Antonio Chamorro Daza (1903-2003): Scientific production during the first years of exile (1937-1945)

2021 ◽  
Vol 106 (106(812)) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
E. Barranco-Castillo ◽  
I. Melgares-Moreno ◽  
F. Girón-Irueste
Keyword(s):  
Research Work ◽  
Scientific Production ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Important Research ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
Endocrine Glands ◽  
Practical Point ◽  
Metasearch Engine ◽  
Almost All

Objetives: The main aim of our work is to highlight the importance of Chamorro’s discoveries in the fields of endocrinology, gynaecology, reproduction and oncology. Methods: Evaluation of the bibliometric impact of Chamorro’s work using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and Gallica. Results: Between 1937 and 1945 Chamorro carried out important research work, the results of which provided valuable discoveries about the activity of the main endocrine glands. Discussion: To achieve our objective, Google Scholar has been the most profitable metasearch engine from a practical point of view, having recognized almost all of the articles published by Chamorro, although having ignored some of them it could be thought that the overall impact of this author is higher than that which has been found. Conclusions: These findings were reflected in the most prestigious journals and widely disseminated in U.S. research institutions, amongst others. In Spain, however, they were ignored. Maybe it’s time to spread it.

Is Google scholar really scholarly?

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fayaz Ahmad Loan ◽  
Shueb Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
Economic Recession ◽  
Child Labour ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Global Problems ◽  
Good Number

Purpose This paper aims to identify the scholarly nature of the results retrieved by the Google Scholar on the five major global problems, i.e. global warming, economic recession, terrorism, HIV AIDS and child labour. Design/methodology/approach The five terms (global warming, economic recession, terrorism, HIV AIDS and child labour) were searched into the Google Scholar database, and the first 50 retrieved hits were manually analysed to record the relevant bibliographic details. The scholarship of the results was measured by quality indices like h-index, Altmetrics and Journal Impact Factor. The Scopus – the world’s biggest abstract and citation database – was used to identify the h-index of the prolific authors, citations of articles and impact factor of journals. Findings The study reveals that Google Scholar retrieves a good number of publications on the selected global problems from reputed publishers such as Nature Publishing Group, Elsevier, Cambridge University Press, Blackwell and Sage and published from well-developed countries such as the USA, UK and Switzerland. Google Scholar mostly retrieves articles and research papers from qualitative journals having a good impact factor such as Nature, Science, The Lancet, American Journal of Public Health, The Economic Journal, Social Science and Medicine and Annals of Tourism Research. These articles and books are contributed by the reputed authors having high h-index. The journal articles and books retrieved have also a good number of citations, although such results are limited. The results prove that Google Scholar is scholarly in nature to a great extent. Research limitations/implications The findings are limited to Google Scholar only and cannot be generalized for the rest of the search tools or databases. Further, the study included only five major global problems in the study, and thus, results cannot be applicable to other areas of knowledge. Practical implications The study is a checklist to know the retrieval performance of Google Scholar in terms of quality of content. Originality/value It is the first study of its kind that takes into account the nature of content on major global problems retrieved by the Google Scholar. It is also the first study that used bibliometric analysis to evaluate the quality of results retrieved.

scholarly journals Self-Citation Analysis on Google Scholar Dataset for H-Index Corrections

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 126025-126036
Author(s):  
Fiaz Majeed ◽  
Muhammad Shafiq ◽  
Amjad Ali ◽  
Muhammad Awais Hassan ◽  
Syed Ali Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index

scholarly journals Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education?

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 2505-2522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret K. Merga ◽  
Sayidi Mat Roni ◽  
Shannon Mason
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
Job Security ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Data Reliability ◽  
H Index ◽  
The United Kingdom

AbstractIn the neoliberal environment of contemporary academia, an individual’s research rankings and outputs can shape their career security and progression. When applying for ongoing employment and promotional opportunities, academics may benchmark their performance against that of superior colleagues to demonstrate their performance in relation to their discipline. The H-index and citation rates are commonly used to quantify the value of an academic’s work, and they can be used comparatively for benchmarking purposes. The focus of this paper is to critically consider if Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education, by weighting up issues of data reliability and participation. The Google Scholar profiles of full professors at top ranked universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America are analysed to explore how widespread Google Scholar use is in the education professoriate. Quartiles of impact are established in relation to H-index, with exploration of how gender is distributed across these quartiles. Limitations of using Google Scholar data are highlighted through a taxonomy of quality confounders, and the utility of Google Scholar as a legitimate tool for benchmarking against the professoriate in education is strongly challenged. As metrics continue to rise in their importance for academics’ job security and promotional prospects, reliance on metrics of dubious quality and uneven participation must be questioned.

Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: The popularization of bibliometric assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabezas-Clavijo ◽  
E. Delgado-López-Cózar
Keyword(s):  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index

scholarly journals Research Output from IISc during 1999-2020: Scientometrics Analysis Case Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 052-062
Author(s):  
Nagarjuna Pitty
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Indian Institute ◽  
H Index ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Research Publications ◽  
Indian Institute Of Science

Over the past Seven decades the knowledge or web of science database maintaining the core collections of Science Citation Index Expanded, and past Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science and past two decades SciELO Citation Index, Journal citation reports. This paper analyses a results of a scientometric analytical case study of the research activities of highly cited papers from 1999 to 2020. This paper study a growth of publications, citations, average citations per publication and H- index of top scientists or researchers, at Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India. Besides that, this paper presents a citation-based mapping of data on global scientific activities from Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India research publications using Web of Science Database. Using different kind of scientometric approaches, such as a h-index and Global Citation Scores. Researchers have published 32191 publications during 1999-2020 and cited at least 5519 times by end of 2020 are analyzed. Authors have been able to place their papers in high impact journals such as Physics, Engineering, Chemistry, Materials Science, Science & Technology, Computer Science, Biochemistry Molecular Biology, Mechanics, Mathematics, Telecommunications, and Crystallography. The study discloses an output of Indian Institute of Science Research Publications has greatly increased over period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document