scholarly journals STATISTICS ANXIETY AND WORRY: THE ROLES OF WORRY BELIEFS, NEGATIVE PROBLEM ORIENTATION, AND COGNITIVE AVOIDANCE

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-75
Author(s):  
AMANDA S. WILLIAMS

Statistics anxiety is a common problem for graduate students. This study explores the multivariate relationship between a set of worry-related variables and six types of statistics anxiety. Canonical correlation analysis indicates a significant relationship between the two sets of variables. Findings suggest that students who are more intolerant of uncertainty, believe that worry is beneficial, possess a negative approach to problems, and utilize cognitive avoidance as a coping strategy are more likely to have higher levels of the six types of statistics anxiety. These results highlight the complexity of graduate students’ statistics anxiety. Suggestions for intervention are discussed. First published November 2015 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-58
Author(s):  
Flavia Jolliffe ◽  
Iddo Gal

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-62
Author(s):  
NOELLE M. CROOKS ◽  
ANNA N. BARTEL ◽  
MARTHA W. ALIBALI

In recent years, there have been calls for researchers to report and interpret confidence intervals (CIs) rather than relying solely on p-values. Such reforms, however, may be hindered by a general lack of understanding of CIs and how to interpret them. In this study, we assessed conceptual knowledge of CIs in undergraduate and graduate psychology students. CIs were difficult and prone to misconceptions for both groups. Connecting CIs to estimation and sample mean concepts was associated with greater conceptual knowledge of CIs. Connecting CIs to null hypothesis  significance testing, however, was not associated with conceptual knowledge of CIs. It may therefore be beneficial to focus on estimation and sample mean concepts in instruction about CIs. First published May 2019 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

First published May 2014 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

Forthcoming IASE Conferences First published November 2013 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

Forthcoming IASE Conferences First published May 2014 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
CHRIS J. WILD

“The Times They Are a-Changin’” says the old Bob Dylan song. But it is not just the times that are a-changin’. For statistical literacy, the very earth is moving under our feet (apologies to Carole King). The seismic forces are (i) new forms of communication and discourse and (ii) new forms of data, data display and human interaction with data. These upheavals in the worlds of communication and data are ongoing. If anything, the pace of change is accelerating. And with it, what it means to be statistically literate is also changing. So how can we tell what is important? We will air some enduring themes and guiding principles. First published May 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-375
Author(s):  
CLAIRE CAMERON ◽  
ELLA IOSUA ◽  
MATTHEW PARRY ◽  
ROSALINA RICHARDS ◽  
CHRYSTAL JAYE

This paper describes a qualitative survey of professional statisticians carried out in New Zealand in 2014. The aim of the study was to find out if the issues this group faced were consistent with those identified in the literature. The issues identified were integrity, legitimacy, isolation, workforce shortage, communication, and marginalisation. They represent points of frustration for statisticians that may impact on the future of the profession as it responds to increasing demands and higher expectations. We found that these issues resonated for many of the statisticians included in our study and we have discussed a number of strategies to address them. They include raising our profile, attracting a broader range of people to the profession, increasing our communication skills, raising the statistical literacy of the people we work with, and a commitment to making it easy to engage with our colleagues. First published November 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
JENNIFER J. KAPLAN

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for the Statistics Education Research Journal in the past year. First published November 2019 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives  


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

First published November 2013 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
JENNIFER. J KAPLAN

Welcome to the third issue of SERJ for 2020. First published December 2020 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document