HARDWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT - What we Can Learn from the Software Development Process for Hardware Design?

2007 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Hardware Design ◽  
Software Development Process

The Influence of the Application of Agile Practices in Software Quality Based on ISO/IEC 25010 Standard

2022 ◽  
pp. 1416-1443
Author(s):  
Gloria Arcos-Medina ◽  
David Mauricio
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Software Quality ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
Agile Practices ◽  
Significant Positive Influence

Agile practices are activities or procedures that are applied during the software development process in order to improve its quality and productivity. The objective of this study is to determine the influence of agile practices on software quality. For this purpose, a model composed of 4 groups of agile practices and 8 quality characteristics according to the ISO/IEC 25010 standard has here been proposed. The results of 146 questionnaires addressed to people involved in the software development process show that the application of agile engineering and project management practices have a significant positive influence on the quality attribute functionality. On the other hand, project management practices have a low impact on the quality characteristics of compatibility, portability, security, and usability.

scholarly journals The Principle of Architecture First in Software Project Management Minimizes the Cost of Software Development Process: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-179
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Software Architecture ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
System Level ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
Software Project Management ◽  
The Cost

Software architecture involves the structure and organization by which modern system components and subsystems interact to form system and the properties of systems that can best be designed and analyzed at the system level. This paper provides a review of the principles of architecture first approach in software project management and its effect on cost of software development process. This paper reviews the literature and practitioners’ experiences relating to architecture first approach, and advantages of architecture first approach in cost of software development process. This paper also reviews related works about factors that may reduce the cost of software development process. Weobserved parameters related to software architecture that may affect the cost of software development process.The parameters are software (product) delivery time, defect prevention, risk mitigation, and change management. After this, the parameters show that they have their own effect on the software development process. Finally, the paper concludes by describing how those parameters affect the cost of software development process.

The Influence of the Application of Agile Practices in Software Quality Based on ISO/IEC 25010 Standard

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-53
Author(s):  
Gloria Arcos-Medina ◽  
David Mauricio
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Software Quality ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Quality Characteristics ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
Agile Practices ◽  
Significant Positive Influence

Agile practices are activities or procedures that are applied during the software development process in order to improve its quality and productivity. The objective of this study is to determine the influence of agile practices on software quality. For this purpose, a model composed of 4 groups of agile practices and 8 quality characteristics according to the ISO/IEC 25010 standard has here been proposed. The results of 146 questionnaires addressed to people involved in the software development process show that the application of agile engineering and project management practices have a significant positive influence on the quality attribute functionality. On the other hand, project management practices have a low impact on the quality characteristics of compatibility, portability, security, and usability.

Organizing the Software Development Process Knowledge: An Approach Based on Patterns

1998 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 461-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco M. de Vasconcelos ◽  
Cláudia Maria Lima Werner
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
Development Environment ◽  
Process Knowledge ◽  
Software Patterns ◽  
Software Development Environment ◽  
Support Software

This paper describes an approach to support software development process descriptions in the context of the Memphis Environment (a Reuse Based Software Development Environment), allowing the organization of a software development asset, i.e., the process knowledge. The approach uses software patterns to organize the information, and provides a tool that handles the process descriptions as a source of solutions to problems detected by project management. It enhances the environment features in terms of project management support, process modeling capability, and process evolution support.

scholarly journals Are UX Evaluation Methods Providing the Same Big Picture?

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3480
Author(s):  
Walter Takashi Nakamura ◽  
Iftekhar Ahmed ◽  
David Redmiles ◽  
Edson Oliveira ◽  
David Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Evaluation Methods ◽  
Sentence Completion ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Software Products ◽  
Big Picture ◽  
The Impact

The success of a software application is related to users’ willingness to keep using it. In this sense, evaluating User eXperience (UX) became an important part of the software development process. Researchers have been carrying out studies by employing various methods to evaluate the UX of software products. Some studies reported varied and even contradictory results when applying different UX evaluation methods, making it difficult for practitioners to identify which results to rely upon. However, these works did not evaluate the developers’ perspectives and their impacts on the decision process. Moreover, such studies focused on one-shot evaluations, which cannot assess whether the methods provide the same big picture of the experience (i.e., deteriorating, improving, or stable). This paper presents a longitudinal study in which 68 students evaluated the UX of an online judge system by employing AttrakDiff, UEQ, and Sentence Completion methods at three moments along a semester. This study reveals contrasting results between the methods, which affected developers’ decisions and interpretations. With this work, we intend to draw the HCI community’s attention to the contrast between different UX evaluation methods and the impact of their outcomes in the software development process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document