QR Steganography - A Threat to New Generation Electronic Voting Systems

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Cucurull ◽  
Sandra Guasch ◽  
Alex Escala ◽  
Guillermo Navarro-Arribas ◽  
Víctor Acín
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
New Generation

scholarly journals The use of electronic voting systems to engage students in outreach activities

2016 ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Gan Niyadurupola
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
School Level ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Difficult Question ◽  
Secondary School Level ◽  
The University ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Primary And Secondary School

This paper discusses the use of electronic voting systems specifically in a range of outreach contexts. The Department of Chemistry at the University of Reading and the School of Chemistry at the University of Southampton are actively involved in delivering outreach activities at primary and secondary school level with a view to inspiring a new generation of budding chemists. Voting systems are successful in engaging students across all age groups as demonstrated by our experiences with youngsters aged 4 to 18. They are especially effective at breaking down the barriers of non communication thrown up by students when faced with a difficult question and encouraging the participation of even the most reticent teenager.

Anomaly Detection in Electronic Voting Systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-206
Author(s):  
Juan Gilbert ◽  
Jerone Dunbar ◽  
Alvitta Ottley ◽  
John Mark Smotherman
Keyword(s):  
Anomaly Detection ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems

scholarly journals Impact of Blockchain in the Voting System

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Keyword(s):  
Review Paper ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
The People ◽  
Voting System ◽  
Major Factors ◽  
Electronic Voting System ◽  
Democratic Country

Voting is important for any democratic country. It can be considered as one of the major factors that make a government for the people and by the people. The most common methods of voting that currently exist are ballot-based voting, purely electronic methods, and Electronic Voting Machines, among others. Over the years, it has been a challenge to build a secure E-voting program that provides the privacy of current voting systems while offering a means of accountability and versatility. Using blockchain technology and cryptography we can make the process of elections as open and cost-effective as possible. In this review paper we discuss a new, blockchain-based electronic voting system that addresses some of the limitations in existing systems and evaluates some of the popular systems designed to create a blockchain-based e-voting system.

scholarly journals Winners and Losers of the Ballot: Electronic vs. Traditional Paper Voting Systems in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Schneider ◽  
Kelly N. Senters
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Regression Discontinuity ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
The Political ◽  
Regression Discontinuity Design ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Political Effects ◽  
Ballot Design ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Gradual Transformation

AbstractScholars concur that free and fair elections are essential for proper democratic functioning, but our understanding of the political effects of democratic voting systems is incomplete. This article mitigates the gap by exploiting the gradual transformation of voting systems and ballot structures in Brazil’s 1998 executive elections to study the relationship between voting systems and viable and nonviable candidates’ vote shares, using regression discontinuity design. It finds that the introduction of electronic voting concentrated vote shares among viable candidates and thus exhibited electoral bias. We posit that this result occurred because viable candidates were better able to communicate the information that electronic voters needed to cast valid ballots than were their nonviable counterparts. The article uses survey data to demonstrate that electronic voters responded to changes in ballot design and internalized the information viable candidates made available to them.

A Synthesis of Vote Verification Methods in Electronic Voting Systems

2014 ◽  
pp. 92-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari ◽  
Adolfo Villafiorita
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Public Verifiability ◽  
Verification Methods ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
System Robustness ◽  
Voting Requirements ◽  
Verification Techniques

A large amount of research has been conducted to improve public verifiability of e-voting systems. One of the challenges is ensuring that different and apparently contradicting requirements are met: anonymity and representation, vote secrecy and verifiability. System robustness from attacks adds further complexity. This chapter summarizes some of the known vote verification techniques and highlights the pros and cons of each technique. Also, it reviews how different verification technologies cover different phases of the voting process and evaluates how these techniques satisfy the e-voting requirements.

Secure Electronic Voting with Cryptography

Cyber Crime ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. 918-935
Author(s):  
Xunhua Wang ◽  
Ralph Grove ◽  
M. Hossain Heydari
Keyword(s):  
Building Blocks ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Security Challenges ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Voting Scheme ◽  
Threshold Decryption

In recent years, computer and network-based voting technologies have been gradually adopted for various elections. However, due to the fragile nature of electronic ballots and voting software, computer voting has posed serious security challenges. This chapter studies the security of computer voting and focuses on a cryptographic solution based on mix-nets. Like traditional voting systems, mix-net-based computer voting provides voter privacy and prevents vote selling/buying and vote coercion. Unlike traditional voting systems, mix-net-based computer voting has several additional advantages: 1) it offers vote verifiability, allowing individual voters to directly verify whether their votes have been counted and counted correctly; 2) it allows voters to check the behavior of potentially malicious computer voting machines and thus does not require voters to blindly trust computer voting machines. In this chapter, we give the full details of the building blocks for the mix-net-based computer voting scheme, including semantically secure encryption, threshold decryption, mix-net, and robust mix-net. Future research directions on secure electronic voting are also discussed.

Electronic Voting Machine

2011 ◽  
pp. 1234-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Roberto Santhias ◽  
Regis Cabral
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Internet Voting ◽  
The World ◽  
Voting Machine

Electronic voting, as well as Internet voting, is in the process of being incorporated into most democracies in the world. The literature on the topic is abundant as well as the technologies offered. Most of the work, nevertheless, seems to bypass the actual origins of the modern (and current) electronic voting systems (Oudenhove et al., 2001).

Alternative Review Screen Design for Electronic Voting Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-99
Author(s):  
Danae V. Holmes ◽  
Philip Kortum
Keyword(s):  
Efficient Method ◽  
Additional Research ◽  
Electronic Voting ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Screen Design ◽  
Verification Methods ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Critical Task

Verifying a ballot for correctness in an election is a critical task for the voter. Previous work has shown that up to 30% of the ballot can be changed without being noticed by more than half of the voters. In response to this ballot weakness, this study evaluated the usability and viability of alternative ballot verification methods in an electronic voting medium. Three verification methods were tested: end-of-ballot, in-line confirmation, and dual confirmation. In-line and dual confirmation perform similarly to end-of-ballot confirmation in terms of effectiveness. The most efficient method is end-of-ballot review, and dual confirmation produced the longest time spent on the review screen. End-of-ballot confirmation produced the highest satisfaction ratings, though survey results indicated that dual confirmation may be the most appropriate method in terms of voting. Additional research in the field is the next step in exploring these confirmation methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document