The relationship between serum pepsinogen and atrophic gastritis according to OLGA classification

2008 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S544-S545
Author(s):  
Adeyinka Laiyemo ◽  
Farin Kamangar ◽  
Pamela Marcus ◽  
Philip Taylor ◽  
Jarmo Virtamo ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-304
Author(s):  
Saburo Harashima ◽  
Kenzi Yamamoto ◽  
Eizi Takayama

2020 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-139183
Author(s):  
Deniz Ogutmen Koc ◽  
Sibel Bektas

BackgroundWe assessed the validity of using serum pepsinogen tests (sPGTs) to differentiate autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) from environmental atrophic gastritis (EAG). We also investigated the correlation and prognostic value between disease stage, according to Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)/Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM), and sPGT results in patients with gastric atrophy.MethodsWe enroled 115 patients in this prospective study: 95 with atrophic gastritis (16 with AAG and 79 with EAG) and 20 non-atrophic gastritis. These patients, along with 32 control patients, underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Atrophy and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric biopsy specimens were staged according to the OLGA/OLGIM staging systems.ResultsThe median (IQR) age of the patients (83 females (56.5%)) was 58 (46–67) years. Patients in the AAG group represented histologically advanced stages. The AAG group had lower pepsinogen (PG) I and II levels, as well as a lower PGI/PGII ratio, compared with the EAG group (p<0.01, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The optimal PGI/PGII ratio for predicting AAG was ≤1.9 (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and that for predicting EAG was ≤9.2 (47.5% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity). The OLGA/OLGIM stage was negatively correlated with the PGI level and PGI/PGII ratio. In the AAG group, four of five patients with low-grade dysplasia had OLGA/OLGIM stage III–IV disease.ConclusionssPGT may provide valuable information for differentiating advanced-stage AAG from EAG, and in patients with atrophic gastritis, use of sPGTs and OLGA/OLGIM staging together may predict gastric cancer risk.


2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Metin Agkoc ◽  
Hakan Dursun ◽  
Fatih Albayrak ◽  
Omer Yilmaz ◽  
Ahmet Kiziltunc ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 693-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Kitahara ◽  
K Kobayashi ◽  
T Sato ◽  
Y Kojima ◽  
T Araki ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND/AIMSThe characteristics of pepsinogen screening for gastric cancer were investigated to establish a suitable cut off point for identifying gastric cancer, using endoscopic diagnosis as the yardstick.SUBJECTS/METHODSSerum pepsinogen concentrations were measured in 5113 subjects who were also screened for gastric cancer by endoscopy. The cut off point for pepsinogen was determined using receiver operator characteristics curves.RESULTSThe most suitable cut off point was a pepsinogen I concentration of less than 70 ng/ml and a ratio of pepsinogen I to pepsinogen II of less than 3.0. Using this cut off point, the sensitivity and specificity of pepsinogen screening for gastric cancer were 84.6% and 73.5% respectively. All cases of gastric cancer in patients with severe atrophic gastritis were detected. However, two of four cases of gastric cancer in patients with mild atrophic gastritis were overlooked. In subjects with mild atrophic gastritis, when gastric cancer arises within the fundic gland region, the size of the lesion determines whether it is possible to detect cancer by serum pepsinogen screening.CONCLUSIONPepsinogen screening has many advantages, including its suitability for combination with other screening methods because it is simple and inexpensive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document