scholarly journals Coserian peripatetics Book review: Eugeniu Coșeriu – Vocația universalității Edited and coordinated by Gheorghe Popa Știința Publishing House, Chișinău

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Chibac ◽  
◽  
Anca Ursache Tcaciuc ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Publishing House ◽  
Cultural Events ◽  
Thematic Section ◽  
Book Covers

Eugenio Coșeriu’s Monumental Centenary Event ‒ 100 years since his birth, is successufully celebrated both in the space of his native lands and abroad. A series of scientific and cultural events are organized. In this context, Știința Publishing House launches the Eugeniu Coșeriu – Vocația universalității / Vocation of Universality book collection under the coordination of Gheorghe Popa. The book covers the protagonist’life in thematic section: in the field of linguistics, literature, interviews ‒ dialogues with and about Eugenio Coseriu, evocations ‒ confessions and reconstructions, reflections on the great coserian model, and, of course, at the end, the iconographic compartment that makes accessible the life in images of master Coseriu.

Book Review: P. S. Vivek. World of Garbage and Waste: Understanding of Swatchh Bharat and Sabka Vikas in India

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-126
Author(s):  
B. K. Nagla
Keyword(s):  
Publishing House

P. S. Vivek. World of Garbage and Waste: Understanding of Swatchh Bharat and Sabka Vikas in India. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House, 2015, 321 pp., ₹950 (hardback), ISBN 978-93-5202-794-1.

A book review: The History of Ural Literature. 19th century. In 2 vols. Ed. by E. K. Sozina. Moscow, Publishing house JASK, 2021, vol. 1. 664 p.; vol. 2. 778 p.

2021 ◽  
pp. 335-339
Author(s):  
Tatyana I. Rozhkova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Publishing House ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Writing Style ◽  
The Urals ◽  
Process Understanding ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
History Of ◽  
Genre Preferences

The review deals with the second volume of the academic edition “The History of Ural Literature,” prepared by a group of scholars from the Ural-Siberian scientific community. The merit of the issue is presenting the literary process and the Ural writers’ community as a complex sociocultural phenomenon aimed at work professionalization and connected with the history of the region’s self-determination. When presenting specific names, the authors of the project followed the principle description tasks: to show the connection of the writer’s biography and work with the territory, to emphasize how the works are filled with impressions of Ural life, to draw attention to the writer’s involvement in local cultural communities and support from leading literary figures and critics. Since the book covers a wide range of authors, a number of conclusions significant for the regional literary process understanding can be drawn. Biography materials allow speaking of a variety of social segments of people involved in writing: from base estates and plant workers to noble and intellectual people. Not everyone was ready for professional literary activity, but all quite openly demonstrated their reading tastes. By the end of the century, the cultural and aesthetic commonality of the Ural literature is defined. Its specific writing style becomes distinctive, with a tendency toward documentality, autobiography, and ethnography. Genre preferences become apparent. Genre preferences become apparent. Most importantly, the names appear, starting to be identified by critics as “the Urals writer.”

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document