scholarly journals O CONCEITO DE TRABALHO ALIENADO EM KARL MARX NA SOCIEDADE CAPITALISTA: DISCUSSÕES FILOSÓFICAS NA MODERNIDADE NOS MANUSCRITOS ECONÔMICOS - FILOSÓFICOS

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Edmilson Gomes Da Silva
Keyword(s):  

<p>O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar o conceito de trabalho alienado no pensamento de Karl Marx na sociedade moderna capitalista aos conhecimentos filosóficos nos manuscritos econômicos – filosóficos,1844. Desse modo, o trabalho alienado é fundamental para um debate e discussões filosóficas na teoria marxista e o liberalismo econômico na modernidade. Na discussão teórica - filosófica, Marx discute o conceito de trabalho alienado a partir de uma crítica aos fundamentos econômicos e políticos na sociedade do mercado/capitalista. Contudo, a literatura teórica é apresentada nos manuscritos econômicos – filosóficos. Nesta obra, Marx faz crítica aos filósofos fisiocratas de Adam Smith e David Ricardo. Estes consideram o trabalho como de fonte de riqueza do trabalhador. Assim, trabalho e alienação vão na lógica sob o processo da mais valia dos sujeitos como a exploração da força do trabalhador para manter a relação econômica para o sistema de produção capitalista. Dessa forma, A metodologia utilizada foi uma pesquisa bibliográfica no pensamento marxista sobre e o conceito de trabalho alienado na sociedade capitalista.</p><p> </p>

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni Pierenkemper

Realökonomische Probleme haben zu allen Zeiten die Theorien der Ökonomie und ihrer großen Denker beeinflusst. Wichtige Themen der Ökonomie sind das gesamtwirtschaftliche Wachstum, Verteilungsprobleme, individuelle Nutzenmaximierung, Keynesianismus, Monetarismus – und ganz neue Ansätze wie Evolutorik, Spieltheorie oder Verhaltensökonomie, die ihr Potenzial noch beweisen müssen. Sie verbinden sich in der Moderne mit Namen von Ökonomen wie Adam Smith, Robert Malthus, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Friedrich List, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes oder Milton Friedman. Oder die Betrachtung der Ökonomie verdichtet sich in Stichworten wie Marginalanalyse, Historische Schule, Neoklassik, Institutionalismus, Neue-Institutionenökonomik und Monetarismus – neuerdings auch Evolutorik, Verhaltensökonomik oder Spieltheorie. Für alle, die zur Ökonomie gründlich aufbereitetes und grundlegendes Überblickswissen mit Prüfungsrelevanz suchen.


Leviathan ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-397
Author(s):  
Heinz D. Kurz

Der Aufsatz vergleicht die Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftstheorie Joseph Alois Schumpeters mit den Theorien anderer großer Sozialwissenschaftler, insbesondere denjenigen von Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, Léon Walras und John Maynard Keynes. Das Hauptaugenmerk gilt Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden. Die in der Sekundärliteratur absolut und relativ wachsende Bedeutung des „Propheten der Innovation“ wird unterstrichen.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Newman ◽  
Kyle S. Bunds

In its most artless definition, political economy refers to the study of inter- and intrastate transaction—concerned in large part with the dialectics of state governance and the production/consumption functions therein. Many of us, with varying degrees of deliberation, have read the works of forerunning political economists such as Adam Smith (c. 1723-1790), David Ricardo (c. 1772-1823), Thomas Malthus (c. 1766-1834), John Stuart Mill (c. 1806-1873), Karl Marx (c. 1818-1883), and Thorstein Veblen (c. 1857-1929). These classic political economists and their contemporaries shared a concern for the extent to which land, labor, income, capital, and the population derived value from, and maintained contingency with, state polity. While each diverged from the others in how to best organize the State in relation to markets and exchange activities (and vice versa) so as to optimize the citizenry’s well-being, these scholars and their contemporaries laid the foundations for the long-standing field of inquiry fixed on exploring how various national political systems (democracy, monarchy, aristocracy, oligarchy, etc.), markets, and political and economic behavior could bring about national prosperity, maximize individual freedom, or raise collective utility.


PAPELES ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 89-105
Author(s):  
Wilson Castro ◽  
Paola Espitia ◽  
Sofía Gallego ◽  
Jorge Galvis ◽  
Diana Gutiérrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Este trabajo hace una exposición, basada en una recopilación documental, sobre la visión de la teoría del valor-trabajo de los autores más representativos de las diferentes escuelas de pensamiento económico desde el siglo XVII con William Petty, pasando por Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, Alfred Marshall, John Keynes, entre otros; esto con la finalidad de determinar la transformación que ha tenido este concepto a través de estos y su evolución histórica. Finalmente, este trabajo concluye que la generalidad de los autores no reconoce una importancia estratégica o mayoritaria al trabajo como único elemento del valor; en cambio, se observa una ponderación entre varios elementos y categorías conceptuales. Adicionalmente, se establece a Marx como punto cúspide de la teoría, y, además, como punto de inflexión en donde la teoría del valor abandona paulatinamente la importancia estratégica del trabajo.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
João Edmilson Fabrini
Keyword(s):  

A teoria do valor-trabalho está fundamentada, consideradas suas diferenças, nos estudos de Adam Smith, David Ricardo e Karl Marx, principalmente. A economia política clássica, sobretudo a crítica da economia política, colocou o trabalho como centro da existência do valor. Mas, no caso da produção orgânica a partir de conhecimentos da agroecologia, existe um componente derivado da natureza no valor. O valor na agroecologia decorre da força da natureza e não apenas da força do trabalho, ou seja, a natureza, e não somente o trabalho, é capaz de agregar valor aos produtos elaborados com conhecimentos da agroecologia.


Author(s):  
M. Sholahuddin

The failure of economic capitalism system stated by Adam Smith (1723-1790) and David Ricardo (1772-1823) actually have been criticized by Karl Marx (1818-1883) in his book "A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" (1857) and "A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" (1859). Karl Marx and Engels compile a new synthesis of economic socialist system. Stranger enough, socialism particularly as economic ideology is destroyed earlier than Capitalism. Meanwhile, capitalism still survives by transforming performance. For examples, at the time of the glory of Socialism age, capitalism was transformed into socialism state with social justice and welfare state concepts, and when Islam began to rise, it was transformed into new performance as if it has characteristic of Islam, but in fact it is still capitalism. This writing tries to criticize both of them by Islamic economic perspective.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-667
Author(s):  
Matías Vernengo

The paper analyzes briefly the changing ideas on the role of money and banks from William Petty to Thomas Tooke, including the works of Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Karl Marx. It analyzes the role of ideas in shaping the evolution of central bank regulation. Particular importance is given to the Bank of England’s inconvertibility period, from 1797 to 1821, and the ensuing debate in shaping Robert Peel’s Bank Act of 1844, which is often seen as the birth of modern central banking. The importance of the Say’s Law, and the inexistence of an alternative theory of the determination of output, is shown to play an essential role in the policy prescriptions of the so-called Bullionist authors, who won the debates that shaped central banking practices in the nineteenth century. The paper concludes with a brief analysis of what is a central bank according to the dominant (marginalist) mainstream of the profession, and what an alternative conception based on what may be termed classical-Keynesian political economy would be. JEL Classification: B10, N20, E58


Author(s):  
John Kenneth Galbraith

This chapter discusses the history of economics and the events that shaped that history. It first considers the nature and content of economics, taking into account questions related to the theory of value and the theory of distribution, the institutions involved in economic activity, and the larger political and social framework in which economic life proceeds. It views economics as a reflection of the world in which specific economic ideas have developed, such as those associated with Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. It argues that economic ideas are not very important when and where there is no economy. Change in economics has been reluctant and reluctantly accepted, especially by those who benefit from the status quo and economists who have a vested interest in what has always been taught and believed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-225
Author(s):  
Stephen Chaikind

AbstractThis paper introduces the role wine has played as a central factor in the history of economic thought. The focus is on an examination of documented sources that connect wine and its viticulture and enology with the evolution of economic concepts. Works by Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill, Léon Walras, Alfred Marshall, and others are examined, as well as wine economic ideas postulated by Greek and Roman thinkers. (JEL Classification: A1, B1, B3, N00)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document