scholarly journals Curricular Models and Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Minors in Global Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn H. Jacobsen ◽  
M. Cameron Hay ◽  
Jill Manske ◽  
Caryl E. Waggett
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Gruner ◽  
Yael Feinberg ◽  
Maddie J. Venables ◽  
Syeda Shanza Hashmi ◽  
Ammar Saad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: International migration, especially forced migration, highlights important medical training needs including cross-cultural communication, human rights, as well as global health competencies for physical and mental healthcare. This paper responds to the call for a ‘trauma informed’ refugee health curriculum framework from medical students and global health faculty. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach to develop a guiding medical undergraduate refugee and migrant health curriculum framework. We conducted a scoping review, key informant faculty interviews and e-surveys, and then, integrated our results into a competency-based curriculum framework with values and principles, learning objectives and curriculum delivery methods and evaluation. Results: The majority of our Canadian medical faculty respondents reported some refugee health learning objectives within their undergraduate medical curriculum. The most prevalent learning objective topics included access to care barriers, social determinants of health for refugees, cross-cultural communication skills, global health epidemiology, challenges and pitfalls of providing care and mental health. We report competency-based learning objectives and primary and secondary topics. We also discuss curriculum delivery and evaluation methods such as community service learning with reflection exercises. Conclusions: This guiding undergraduate medical education curriculum suggests integrating cross-cultural communication skills, exploration of access to care barriers for newcomers, and system approaches to improve refugee and migrant healthcare. Programs should also consider social determinants of health, community service learning and the development of links to community resettlement and refugee organizations.


Author(s):  
Jessica B. Landry ◽  
Michael B. Pitt ◽  
Nicole E. St Clair ◽  
Sheridan Langford ◽  
Risha L. Moskalewicz

Over the last several years, there has been a surge of readily available curricular resources for global health (GH) educators that theoretically has enabled them to overcome the barrier of needing to create new content for their programs. Despite this increase in available resources, integrating GH education into the already busy schedule of residency is a common challenge to the growing number of GH track directors. In this perspectives piece, GH educators from multiple institutions will share a novel model for packaging, administering, and monitoring GH educational curricula. This model transposes traditional GH learning objectives into self-paced, longitudinal maps of opportunities suitable for the time-intensive demands of residency, with flexibility for individual learning preferences and built-in tracking mechanisms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1022-1027
Author(s):  
Alison M. Bales ◽  
Anthony R. Oddo ◽  
David J. Dennis ◽  
Robert C. Siska ◽  
Echo VanderWal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Stratil ◽  
E A Rehfuess ◽  
K Geffert

Abstract Background Global Health (GH) is receiving increasing attention, in Germany, Europe and internationally. Despite an increased demand, teaching on GH remains fragmented and heterogeneous in the university landscape in German-speaking countries. Moreover, there is a lack of common understanding of GH and interpretations range from GH as tropical medicine to GH as everything related to health. This project aims to develop (A) a framework of different GH concepts, as a basis for (B) a set of GH learning objectives for German-speaking countries. Methods A review of publications providing GH definitions was carried out. Following a concept analysis approach, we developed a general framework of different and partially overlapping GH understandings. Building on these results we conducted an overview of reviews on learning objectives and curricula for GH to develop a set of learning objectives. Results The general framework distinguishes between GH concepts describing GH as (1)a set of global health issues (e.g. COVID-19), (2) a global ideal to strive for, (3 + 4) any activities relating to said global health issues or ideals (e.g. all activities contributing to health equity), and (5) sets of activities meeting various characteristics (e.g. being transdisciplinary and transnational). Within each concept, multiple sets of axes allow a more granular distinction of the concepts (e.g. regarding the relation to public health and tropical medicine). The list of key learning objectives shows considerable overlap with widely accepted public health core competencies. Differences include e.g. a (stronger) emphasis on intercultural and interdisciplinary collaboration, globalisation and transnational determinants of health. Conclusions A systematic reflection on commonalities and differences in the understanding of GH is important for a shared understanding. Based on the GH learning objectives we will develop core competencies for GH, including through an online survey of GH experts. Key messages The GH:ADT framework of global health concepts supports a systematic reflection on and recognition of the multi-dimensional nature of Global Health. The learning objectives identified in the GH:ADT project can be a valuable tool for curriculum development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Laux ◽  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Jennifer Meka

Introduction Recent focus from accrediting bodies emphasizes learning objectives as a means of mapping and standardizing content coverage. While most educational training centers on faculty-derived learning objectives that are geared towards didactic lectures, student-centered teaching modalities like problem-based learning continue to gain popularity. One opportunity is the integration of student-generated learning goals in curriculum development. The educational philosophy at the Penn State College of Medicine University Park Regional Campus centers on discussion-based Inquiry Groups that focus on students’ experiential case learning which leads to student-generated learning objectives. This study examined a student-centered approach to learning objectives. Methods Our quantitative analysis explored student-generated learning objectives during the first-year curriculum. Primary outcome measures included process variables investigating the growth and change of objectives across the year that include Bloom’s taxonomy-based verb scores, verb numbers per session, and learning objective word lengths. Knowledge-based content coverage variables were compared with existing curricular models. Results Student-derived learning objectives changed substantially over the year. Taxonomy scores decreased while the learning objective verb number, word length, and calculated value per session increased significant. Content and comparator analyses showed that coverage and verb quality met or exceeded existing curricular models. Discussion Student-generated learning objectives are not only plausible and achievable, they also provide distinct pacing and engagement benefits. Our findings serve as a model for student-centered educational innovations.


2011 ◽  
pp. 061611145657
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Cordell
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bingaman ◽  
Robert G. Frank ◽  
Carrie L. Billy

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie M. Brown ◽  
Amy Garczynski ◽  
Jana Hackathorn ◽  
Natalie Homa ◽  
Ursula A. Sanborn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document