scholarly journals Analysis of initial barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a county wide integrated care project in Estonia: experience from the PAIK service

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Mart Kull
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii13-iii59
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad Zaheer ◽  
Sinead Stoneman ◽  
Maire Rafferty ◽  
Amalia Ioana Costea ◽  
George Pope ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Nolte ◽  
Jemima Kamano ◽  
Violet Naanyu ◽  
Anthony Etyang ◽  
Antonio Gasparrini ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAmid the rising number of people with NCDs, Kenya has invested in strengthening primary care and in efforts to expand existing service delivery platforms to integrate care for managing chronic disease. One such approach is the AMPATH model, established in 2001 in western Kenya to provide HIV treatment and control services. The model was progressively adapted and developed further to provide care for people with other chronic conditions. Building on this experience, the Primary Health Integrated Care Project for Chronic Conditions (PIC4C) was launched in 2018 to further strengthen primary care services for the prevention and control of hypertension, diabetes, breast and cervical cancer. This study seeks to understand how well PIC4C delivers on its intended aims and to inform and support scale up of the PIC4C model for integrated care for people with selected chronic conditions in Kenya.MethodsThe study is guided by a conceptual framework on implementing, sustaining and spreading innovation in health service delivery. We use a multimethod design combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, involving: (1) in-depth interviews with health workers and decision-makers to explore experiences of delivering PIC4C; (2) a cross-sectional survey of patients newly diagnosed with diabetes or hypertension and in-depth interviews to understand how well PIC4C meets patients’ needs; (3) a cohort study with an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the degree to which PIC4C leads to health benefits such as improved management of hypertension or diabetes; and (4) a cohort study of households to examine the extent to which the national hospital insurance chronic care package provides financial risk protection to people with hypertension or diabetes within PIC4C.Workshops with decision-makers and other key people at local, county, national and international levels will ensure early and wide dissemination of the findings of the work to allow for the wider scale up of this model of care.DiscussionOur study will generate new knowledge about the key mechanisms and factors that shape the successful implementation of novel ways of delivering more integrated services to better manage and support people with chronic conditions in low resource settings. It will expand understanding of intended and unintended consequences of integrating NCD management into existing care programmes. This knowledge can be leveraged to inform and improve the design and implementation of similar programmes elsewhere in Kenya and beyond.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Eskil Degsell ◽  
Sofia Hylin ◽  
Giuseppe Stragliotto ◽  
Petra Danapfel ◽  
Anna Blommengren ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Victar Hsieh ◽  
Glenn Paull ◽  
Barbara Hawkshaw

ObjectiveHeart failure (HF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of HF patients will have repeated hospital presentations. Effective integration between general practice and existing HF management programs may address some of the challenges in optimising care for this complex patient population. The Heart Failure Integrated Care Project (HFICP) investigated the barriers encountered by primary healthcare providers in providing care to patients with HF in the community. MethodsFive general practices in the St George and Sutherland regions (NSW, Australia) that employed practice nurses (PNs) were enrolled in the project. Participants responded to a printed survey that asked about their perceived role in the management of HF patients and their current knowledge and confidence in managing this condition. Participants also took part in a focus group meeting and were asked to identify barriers to improving HF patient management in general practice, and to offer suggestions about how the project could assist them to overcome those barriers. ResultsBarriers to effective delivery of HF management in general practice included clinical factors (consultation time limitations, underutilisation of patient management systems, identifying patients with HF, lack of patient self-care materials), professional factors (suboptimal hospital discharge summary letters, underutilisation of PNs), organisation factors (difficulties in communication with hospital staff, lack of education regarding HF management) and system issues (no Medicare rebate for B-type natriuretic peptide testing, insufficient Medicare rebate for using PN in chronic disease management). ConclusionsThe HFICP identified several barriers to improving integrated management for HF patients in the Australian setting. These findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between hospitals and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients. What is known about the topic?Multidisciplinary HF programs are heterogeneous in their structures, they have low patient participation rates and a significant proportion of HF patients have further presentations to hospital with HF. Integrating the care of HF patients into the primary care system following hospital admission remains challenging. What does this paper add?This paper identified several factors that hinder the effective delivery of care by primary care providers to patients with HF. What are the implications for practitioners?The findings provide important insights into how an HF integrated care model can be implemented to strengthen the working relationship between tertiary health facilities and primary care providers in delivering better care to HF patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Maaike Hoedemakers ◽  
Fenna Leijten ◽  
Melinde Boland ◽  
Maureen Rutten-van Molken

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document