scholarly journals Aseptic loosening of hip implant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heba Abdelmonem
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
M A Berglezov ◽  
Tat'yana Mikhaylovna Andreeva ◽  
M A Berglezov ◽  
T M Andreeva


Author(s):  
Hannah J. Lundberg ◽  
Kristofer J. Stewart ◽  
Thomas D. Brown

Polyethylene debris shed during the use of total hip implants can result in debris-induced aseptic loosening. This aseptic loosening is the leading cause of implant failure. Total hip implant wear is highly variable and can be accelerated by third body ingress and subsequent roughening of the metal femoral head counterface. Up to 40% of clinical wear rate variance may be attributable to third body effects [1]. It is hypothesized that the location of counterface roughening will have dramatic effects on the induced implant wear. Using a previously validated sliding-distance-coupled contact finite element (FE) model of total hip implant wear [2], we identified regions of the femoral head surface that, when roughened, result in maximal wear. By implication, these are the sites most important to protect from third body access.


Author(s):  
Robert L. Brochin ◽  
Ryley K. Zastrow ◽  
Akshar V. Patel ◽  
Bradford O. Parsons ◽  
Evan L. Flatow ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (06) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mumme ◽  
P. Reinartz ◽  
D. Wirtz ◽  
F. U. Niethard ◽  
U. Büll ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: Identification of typical patterns for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in positron emission tomography (PET) to detect aseptic loosening of hip prosthesis (ace-tabular and/or femoral component) and prosthetic infection. Methods: 18 patients with painful hip prosthesis underwent PET using a dedicated full ring scanner after application of 200-300 MBq FDG. The interface between bone and surrounding soft tissue or bone as displayed on coronal slices was divided into 12 segments in accordance with the classifications of Delee and Gruen. FDG uptake in each of the segments was scored (0-3) by two independent observers. Intraoperative findings were regarded as the gold standard. Results: After surgical revision 14 acetabular components and 9 femoral components were found to be loose and prosthetic infection was present in 7 prostheses. Loosening of the acetabular component was correlated to enhanced uptake in the middle of the acetabular interface, while loosening of the femoral component was correlated to enhanced uptake in the proximal and middle segment of the lateral femoral interface and the proximal segment of the medial femoral interface. A similar pattern was found in prosthetic infection with high uptake along the middle portion of the lateral fe-moral interface. In 6 of 7 infected prostheses loosening of the acetabular and of the femoral component was present. Taking the typical uptake patterns as criteria for loosening and grade 3 uptake as an additional criterion for septic loosening the accuracy of PET imaging in the detection of loosening of the acetabular or the femoral component and of prosthetic infection was 72, 78 and 89%, respectively. Conclusion: This pilot study presents FDG-PET as a promising diagnostic tool for patients with painful hip prostheses. Its clinical value should be evaluated in a larger patient population.


Author(s):  
Clayton C. Bettin ◽  
William B. Sisson ◽  
Anita L. Kerkhof ◽  
William M. Mihalko

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (04) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Steiner ◽  
S. Laurich ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
J. Kordelle ◽  
R. Klett

SummaryIn not infected knee prostheses bone scintigraphy is a possible method to diagnose mechanical loosening, and therefore, to affect treatment regimes in symptomatic patients. However, hitherto studies showed controversial results for the reliability of bone scintigraphy in diagnosing loosened knee prostheses by using asymptomatic control groups. Therefore, the aim of our study was to optimize the interpretation procedure and to evaluate the accuracy using results from revision surgery as standard. Methods: Retrospectively, we were able to examine the tibial component in 31 cemented prostheses. In this prostheses infection was excluded by histological or bacteriological examination during revision surgery. To quantify bone scintigraphy, we used medial and lateral tibial regions with a reference region from the contralateral femur. Results: To differentiate between loosened and intact prostheses we found a threshold of 5.0 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio of the both tibial regions and a threshold of 18% for the difference of the ratio of both tibial regions. Using these thresholds, values of 0.9, 1, 0.85, 1, and 0.94 were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy, respectively. To get a sensitivity of 1, we found a lower threshold of 3.3 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio. Conclusion: Quantitative bone scintigraphy appears to be a reliable diagnostic tool for aseptic loosening of knee prostheses with thresholds evaluated by revision surgery results being the golden standard.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 266-271
Author(s):  
Georgina Kakra Wartemberg ◽  
Thomas Goff ◽  
Simon Jones ◽  
James Newman

Aims: To create a more effective system to identify patients in need of revision surgery. Background: There are over 160,000 total hip and knee replacements performed per year in England and Wales. Currently, most trusts review patients for up to 10 years or more. When we consider the cost of prolonged reviews, we cannot justify the expenditure within a limited budget. Study Design & Methods: We reviewed all patients' notes that underwent primary hip and knee revision surgery at our institution, noting age, gender, symptoms at presentation, referral source, details of the surgery, reason for revision and follow up history from primary surgery. Results: There were 145 revision arthroplasties (60 THR and 85 TKR) that met our inclusion criteria. Within the hip arthroplasty group, indications for revision included aseptic loosening (37), dislocation (10), and infection (3), periprosthetic fracture, acetabular liner wear and implant failure. All thirty-seven patients with aseptic loosening presented with pain. Twenty-five were referred from general practice with new symptoms. The remaining were clinic follow-ups. The most common reason for knee revision was aseptic loosening (37), followed by infection (21) and then progressive osteoarthritis (8). Most were referred from GP as a new referral or were clinic follow-ups. All patients were symptomatic. Conclusion: All the patients that underwent revision arthroplasty were symptomatic. Rather than yearly follow up, we recommend a cost-effective system. We are implementing a 'non face-to-face' system. Patients would be directly sent a questionnaire and x-ray form. The radiographs and forms will be reviewed by an experienced arthroplasty surgeon. The concerning cases will be seen urgently in a face-to-face clinic.


Polymer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 123865
Author(s):  
Bankole I. Oladapo ◽  
S. Abolfazl Zahedi ◽  
Sikiru O. Ismail

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0028
Author(s):  
Karim Mahmoud ◽  
Sreenivasulu Metikala ◽  
Kathryn O’Connor ◽  
Daniel Farber

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement has become a popular treatment option for end stage ankle arthritis. Most of the reports of adverse events following total ankle replacement have been from high volume institutions and are subject to either observational or selection bias as well as potential under-reporting as they do not include the experience of community and lower volume centers and surgeons. The FDA’s Medical and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database provides a more complete scope of adverse events due to the mandatory reporting requirements by the FDA of implant manufactures. We reviewed the database to identify the common modes of failure and complications of total ankle implants Methods: We retrospectively reviewed reports of the MAUDE database from November 2011 to September 2018 regarding all total ankle implants. Each device in the MAUDE database is classified with a 3-letter code, we identified the 2 codes assigned to total ankle arthroplasty devices, and manually searched the FDA’s published Device Classification list for adverse events. All events were reviewed and classified. Data related to patient age or sex, surgeon, medical center location are not available in the database Results: We identified 1000 adverse reports in the period between November 2011 and September 2018. After exclusion of duplicate reports for single events or reports irrelevant to total ankle arthroplasty, a total of 697 adverse event reports were noted. The most common mode of failure was aseptic loosening (21%), followed by infection (16%), alignment and mechanical issues (instability, malalignment, malposition, stiffness, impingement) (15%), implantation issues (pin, screw or drill breakage, alignment guide problems) (9%), polyethylene related problems (wear, displaced or fractured implants) (7%), bony and soft tissue overgrowth (6%), and peri-prosthetic fractures (5%). Conclusion: Our analysis reveals that the most reported mode of failure was aseptic loosening followed by infection. However, it is notable that there are a significant number of issues with implant alignment and mechanics, complications during implantation and polyethylene component failure that are under-reported in the literature. Knowledge of these adverse events may help surgeons avoid similar complications as well as lead to improvement in component implantation and design


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document