scholarly journals A Prospective Randomized Study to compare Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Forearm Orthopaedic Surgeries under Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2075-2081
Author(s):  
Wasim Khursheed Mir ◽  
Vipin Kumar Varshney ◽  
Md Shahbaz Alam ◽  
Prateek Singh ◽  
G.S. Jheetay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Onset Of Action ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Brachial plexus block utilizing ultrasound imaging has now become either adjuvant to general anaesthesia (GA) or as a mainstay anaesthesia modality. There are fewer studies comparing the effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The aim of this study was to do a prospective randomized study to compare 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine in patients undergoing forearm orthopaedic surgeries under Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group R with 28 patients was given 30mL of 0.5% Ropivacaine and Group L with 28 patients were given 30 mL of 0.5% Levobupivacaine, drugs were used for giving supraclavicular block under ultrasound. Parameters assessed were onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and any adverse events. After administration of block, the block characteristics were assessed every 5mins till the onset of the complete blockade, then hourly till the effect of the block. Data between the groups were analysed using SPSS 25.0 software. Results: Demographically both the groups were comparable in the study. The study shows that there was a statistically significant difference in onset of sensory block in Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine (7.54 mins ± 2.10 vs 8.55 mins ± 2.08), similarly there was the difference in onset of motor block in Levobupivacaine 12.95 mins ± 2.30 vs Ropivacaine 14.07 mins ± 2.22. The duration of analgesia was more in the group of patients Levobupivacaine (9.98 hours ± 4.88) Ropivacaine (8.03 hours ± 3.58) Conclusion: the onset of action of sensory and motor was early in Levobupivacaine group with faster recovery of motor function as compared to the equivalent dose of Ropivacaine. Levobupivacaine has a better profile in terms of duration of analgesia. Keywords: Brachial plexus block, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, ultrasound guidance

scholarly journals Effect of Midazolam and 0.5% Levobupivacaine Combination in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries - A Clinical Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Bhawana Rastogi ◽  
Ankush Arora ◽  
Kumkum Gupta ◽  
Manish Jain ◽  
Vijendra Pal Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
End Points ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: The present study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that midazolam as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine would safely enhance the duration of analgesia without any adverse effects when compared with levobupivacaine alone, in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Primary end points were the duration of sensory and motor block and secondary end points were sedation score and any other complications. Patients and Method: Eighty consenting patients of both sexes, aged 18-60 years of ASA physical status I-II were randomized into two groups of 40 patients each. Patients in Group LS received 19 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1 ml normal saline and patients in Group LM received 19 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 1ml midazolam (50µg/kg) for supraclavicular brachial plexus block using ultrasound guidance. Onset time and duration of sensory and motor blockade and VAS scores were assessed as primary end points. Hemodynamic changes, sedation or any other drug or technique related adverse effects were taken as secondary effects. Results: Onset of sensory and motor blockade was lower in patients of Group LM. The mean duration of sensory analgesia was significantly prolonged in patients of Group LM (537.6 ± 101.01 vs. 319.80 ± 87.09 mins). The mean duration of motor blockade was also significantly enhanced in patients of Group LM (405.0 ± 61.62 mins) compared to Group LS (274.8 ± 46.30 mins). VAS scores were higher in Group LS than group LM. Sedation scores were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Midazolam with 0.5% levobupivacaine has effectively enhanced the duration of sensory and motor block without significant sedation and any other side effect.

Comparative study of (0.5%) levobupivacaine and (0.75%) ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by lateral approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2426
Author(s):  
Jitesh Kumar ◽  
. Sweta ◽  
Kumari Kanak Lata ◽  
B. K. Prasad ◽  
V. K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: As compared to general anaesthesia, brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery gives fewer side effects and better postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.5% levobupivacaine and compare it with 0.75% ropivacaine.Methods: For this prospective randomized, controlled study, 60 patients of both sexes of ASA grade 1 and 2 were enrolled and divided into two groups and supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed by lateral approach using 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. The onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block and analgesia and possible adverse events were recorded.Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the onset of sensory block in both groups. Onset of motor block was significantly faster in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05). Duration of sensory block, motor block and analgesia was significantly longer in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05).Conclusions: 0.5% levobupivacaine is better alternative to 0.75% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block in term of early onset of sensory block and long duration of analgesia.

Effect of Dexamethasone on The Duration of Analgesia for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
Md Rafiqul Islam ◽  
Laila Yesmin ◽  
Md Pervez Rahman ◽  
ABM Shafiul Anam Khan ◽  
Md Miraj Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Brachial plexus block with Bupivacaine provides effective intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia. The use of dexamethasone along with local anesthetic has been shown to improve the duration of analgesia. Objective: To observe the effect of Dexamethasone on the duration of analgesia for Supraclavicular Brachial plexus block. Materials and Methods: A prospective, double-blind study was undertaken in patients scheduled for upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. patients were randomly divided into two groups, Group (BD) and B. Group B received 28 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2 ml normal saline while Group BD received 28 ml of 0.25% bupivacain with 2ml (8mg) dexamethasone for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The groups were compared regarding quality of sensory and motor blockade. All the information was recorded in data collection sheet. Data was processed and analysed with the help of computer program SPSS and Microsoft excel. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in respect of demographic and American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) status. Mean age was found to 34.7±8.53 years. In Group (BD) , 63.3% were ASA I and 36.6% were ASA II. In Group B, 60% were ASA I and 40% were ASA II. It has become evident that satisfactory anaesthesia can be made possible by addition of adjuvant to local anaesthetic in brachial plexus block (in Group-BD). onset of sensory block was faster in Group BD (8.17 ± 1.4 min) than Group B (9.12 ± 1.68 min). Similarly mean onset time of motor block in group A was 12.26 ± 3.96 min, and 11.58 ± 3.68 min in group B. Our study shows that duration of motor block was 408.68±26.96 min and 380.26 ± 24.11 min in group BD and Group B respectively. Conclusion: There was significantly prolonged duration of analgesia in addition of Dexamethasone without any unwanted effects. KYAMC Journal Vol. 11, No.-4, January 2021, Page 199-203

SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK IN UPPER LIMB SURGERIES: ULTRASOUND-GUIDED VERSUS NERVE STIMULATORTECHNIQUE

2017 ◽  
pp. 104-108
Author(s):  
Van Tri Nguyen ◽  
Van Minh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Group I ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Plexus Block

Objective: To compare the onset and duration ofsensory and motor blockade,success and complications rate of these two techniques. Subjects and methods: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing upper limb surgeries at Hue Central Hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were divided into two groups. Group I underwentultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block, group II with nerve stimulator. Each group received 25ml levobupivacaine 0.5% and 1/200000 adrenalin. Results:The procedure time (9.82 ± 4.55 vs 14.73 ± 4.73 min), the onset of sensory (6.15 ± 1.60 vs 9.92 ± 2.88 min) and motor block (7.95 ± 1.05 vs 12.63 ± 2.15 min) in group I were significant shorter than in Group II (p < 0.05). The duration of sensory and motor block, (481.38 ± 116.66 vs 319.22 ± 143.14 min and 412.97 ± 107.32 vs 205.88 ± 48.96 min, respectively) were significant longer in group I than in Group II (p < 0.05). The success rate (98.3% vs 90%) and complication incidence (1.7% vs 8.4%) were comparable between two groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance for supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade provided faster onset, longer duration of sensory and motor block, higher success rate with fewer complications in comparison withnerve stimulator technique Key words: brachial plexus block, ultrasound-guided

scholarly journals A Comparative Study Between Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Jeevan Singh ◽  
Samir Shakya ◽  
Anuranjan Ghimire ◽  
Sanjay Saha ◽  
Parikshit Bikram Singh
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Different Doses

Background: Though, various studies have been conducted to show the efficacy of            dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to brachial plexus block, there is no clear consensus for its optimal dose. We compared 2 different doses of dexmedetomidine (1mcg/kg Vs 2mcg/kg) with ropivaciane in USG guided brachial plexus block for the quality of anesthesia and analgesia. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients (18-50years, 50-60kgs), ASA PS I and II undergoing surgery of upper limb were enrolled in this prospective, double blind, randomized control trial. Group Rd received 19ml of 0.5% Ropivaciane with 1mcg/kg  of dexmedetomidine (total 20ml), and Group RD received 19ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine with 2mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine (total 20ml). Onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation score, hemodyanamic changes were compared. We also monitored for various un towards effects. Results: The onset time of sensory and motor block (9.36±1.114 mins and 14.40 ± 1.528 mins in group Rd vs 8.32 ±0.945 mins and 12.40 ± 1.21 mins in group RD) were not significantly different between two groups (p-value > 0.05).The duration of sensory and motor block (596.20 ± 76.859 mins and 541.20±81.564 mins in group Rd vs 730.80 + 65.187 mins and 659.80±93.607 mins in group RD) were not significantly longer in group RD than group Rd (p-value > 0.05). The duration of analgesia (626.00±70.475 mins in group Rd vs 754.00±60.139 mins in group RD) were not significantly longer in group RD than group Rd (p-value > 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters were also comparable between two groups (p-value >0.05) but 3 patients in RD group (2mcg/kg) developed bradycardia and required treatment with atropine whereas in Rd group (1mcg/kg) none developed bradycardia. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the onset and duration of block between the two groups. However, higher dose of    dexmedetomidine is associated bradycardia. Hence, in comparision with 2mcg/kg, 1mcg/kg of   dexmedetomidine is better adjuvant to 0.5% ropivaciane in terms of safety and effectiveness.Keywords: dexmedetomidine; ropivacaine; supraclavicular brachial plexus block. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document