Comparison of Intra Abdominal Pressure Monitoring Techniques and the Effects of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2298-2301
Author(s):  
Salman A. Shah ◽  
Saeedah Asaf
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Renal Blood Flow ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Bladder Pressure ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Background: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition that develops in the setting of increasing and uncontrolled intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), leading to cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic and/or renal dysfunction. Aims: To establish a porcine model for the evaluation of the effects of IAH on renal blood flow (RBF) and to determine if IVC pressure and/or Camino fiberoptic direct intraabdominal pressure measurements can accurately predict IAPs that have been derived using bladder pressure measurements. Methods: Abdominal laparotomy, placement of IAP and RBF measuring devices, and fascial closure were performed on six adult feeder pigs with a mean body weight of 25 +/- 5 kg. A Transonic Doppler flow probe, a suprapubic bladder catheter, a Camino fiberoptic probe, and a triple lumen central venous catheter were placed and then baseline measurements were taken of renal blood flow, bladder pressure, direct intra-peritoneal Camino pressure and IVC pressure, respectively. Normal saline was then infused into the abdomen to simulate increasing IAP. Following a 5–10-minute stabilization period, all measurements were again taken. Results: The correlation between IVC pressure and bladder pressure was 0.98, with a mean bias of -0.5 (SD 2.0; 95% CI: -0.9, -0.2). The correlation between direct IAP readings by Camino probe and bladder pressure was 0.91, with a mean bias of -3.9 (SD 4.3; 95% CI: -4.6, -3.2). There was a strong negative correlation (-0.95) between RBF and bladder pressure. At an IAP of 20 mmHg, RBF reduced by an average of 45.4% (95% CI: 40%, 50.8%). Upon abdominal decompression, RBF returned to 66.6% (95% CI: 54.3%, 78.9%) of its baseline value. Conclusions: A porcine model is effective in accurately measuring changes in real time RBF. RBF progressively declines as IAP increases, however upon decompression, it fails to achieve complete recovery. IVC pressure measurements correlate well with, and therefore may substitute, the gold standard bladder pressure measurements as representatives of IAP. Keywords: Abdominal Compartment syndrome, renal blood flow, intrabdominal hypertension, bladder pressure

Secondary Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Risk Factors and Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 982-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Britt ◽  
T. Gannon ◽  
J.N. Collins ◽  
F.J. Cole ◽  
L.J. Weireter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Control Ventilation ◽  
Bladder Pressure ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Hemodynamic Compromise ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), defined as intra-abdominal hypertension with associated pulmonary, renal, or hemodynamic compromise in the absence of preceding abdominal operation or injury, can markedly increase surgical morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective chart review of the physiologic parameters and outcomes of 10 patients with secondary ACS. Ten patients developed secondary ACS after aggressive resuscitation, at an average of 20.2 hours. Four of the patients sustained burns greater than 40 per cent, three of the patients had penetrating extremity trauma, one patient had blunt abdominal trauma, one patient was struck by lightning, and one patient developed a retroperitoneal bleed while on heparin. The average bladder pressure was 40.6. The average volume given in the first 24 hours was 33,001 cc (range, 12,400 to 69,000). The average base deficit at admission was -12 (range, +1 to -25). Seven of the 10 patients had decreased urine output. Nine of the 10 patients had decreased tidal volumes on pressure control ventilation. All 10 patients were hypotensive, with 7 of the 10 requiring vasopressors. Overall mortality was 60 per cent, with 43 per cent mortality for those decompressed. Prompt recognition and treatment are mandatory for survival of ACS. We recommend routine bladder pressure monitoring for patients with ongoing resuscitation greater than 500 cc/hr.

scholarly journals Incidence, Outcomes, and Factors Associated with Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Primary Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Abdominopelvic Injury Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Amonpon Kanlerd ◽  
Krissada Nakornchai ◽  
Karikarn Auksornchart ◽  
Warapan Watkwaw
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Bladder Pressure ◽  
Blood Component ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Background. The primary aim was to identify the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and primary abdominal compartment syndrome (1oACS) of abdominopelvic injury patients at Thammasat University Hospital (TUH), Thailand, and the secondary objective was to evaluate those factors that contributed to developing these conditions. Methods. The retrospective cohort of 38 abdominopelvic injury cases was admitted to the intensive care unit at Thammasat University Hospital, from January 1st to December 31st, 2018. The bladder pressure was recorded every 4 hours until the urethral catheter was removed. Data of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, injury mechanisms, initial vital signs, imaging, laboratory data, blood component requirements, abdominal organs involved, treatments including surgery and intervention radiology, abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and injury severity score (ISS), length of ICU stays, and results of treatment were all analyzed. Results. The patients were mostly young (mean age 31.5 years), male (68.4%), and suffering from blunt trauma (89.5%). The mean maximum bladder pressure was 8.3 ± 5.2 mmHg. Six patients (15.8%) developed IAH, and one patient (2.6%) was diagnosed with 1oACS. Two patients expired. The multivariate analysis showed the patient who had initial Cr ≥ 1.5 g/dL, lower extremity including pelvis AIS ≥3, and ISS >15 was significantly associated with the developing of IAH. Conclusions. The incidence of IAH and 1oACS was 15.8% and 2.6%. Predicted factors to find developing IAH were initial Cr ≥ 1.5 g/dL, lower extremity AIS ≥3, and ISS >15. We should consider awareness of IAH and 1oACS in abdominopelvic injury patients.

scholarly journals Abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis (review of literature)

2020 ◽  
Vol 179 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
L. A. Otdelnov ◽  
A. S. Mukhin
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Decompressive Laparotomy ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

The study was performed for analysis of current understanding of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.The English and Russian articles about intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis were analyzed. The articles were found in «Russian Science Citation Index» and «PubMed».There is a pathogenetic relationship between increased intra-abdominal pressure and the development of severe acute pancreatitis.For today, it was shown that intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute pancreatitis is associated with significantly higher APACHE-II and MODS score, prevalence of pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue lesions, early infection of pancreatic necrosis and higher mortality.The article considers various variants of decompressive interventions such as decompressive laparotomy, fasciotomy and percutaneous catheter drainage. For today, there are no randomized studies devoted to researching effectiveness of different decompressive interventions.The study showed that it is necessary to regularly monitor intra-abdominal pressure in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension require emergency medical management to reduce intra-abdominal pressure. Inefficiency of the medical management and development of abdominal compartment syndrome are indications for surgery. The effectiveness of different decompressive interventions requires further studies.

scholarly journals Is intraabdominal pressure a predictive factor for mortality and morbidity in abdominal trauma?

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Daniel Ion ◽  
Dan Nicolae Păduraru ◽  
Florentina Mușat ◽  
Octavian Andronic ◽  
Alexandra Bolocan
Keyword(s):  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Intraabdominal Pressure ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

AbstractThe clinical signs and symptoms of an acute in increase intraabdominal pressure (IAP) are subtle, especially in the conditions of the polytraumatized patient. Thus, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) can brutally occur and can have a major impact on the body’s main organs and systems. The purpose of our research was to identify the influence of intraabdominal pressure, intra-abdominal hypertension, and abdominal compartment syndrome, in the evolution of polytraumatized patients. Our study analyzed the patients admitted in the IIIrd Department of General Surgery of University Emergency Hospital in Bucharest between 1st of January 2010 and 31st of December 2018. The value of intraabdominal pressure, on admission, correlated with the risk of IAH/ ACS in patients with abdominal trauma - being major causes of morbidity and mortality. IAP monitoring should become a mandatory part of the management plan for patients with abdominal trauma.

Pathophysiology and Management of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Walker ◽  
Laura M. Criddle
Keyword(s):  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Oxygen Free Radicals ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Decompressive Laparotomy ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Translocation Of Bacteria ◽  
Serial Measurements ◽  
Abdominal Compartment ◽  
Multiorgan Dysfunction Syndrome

Abdominal compartment syndrome is a potentially lethal condition caused by any event that produces intra-abdominal hypertension; the most common cause is blunt abdominal trauma. Increasing intra-abdominal pressure causes progressive hypoperfusion and ischemia of the intestines and other peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures. Pathophysiological effects include release of cytokines, formation of oxygen free radicals, and decreased cellular production of adenosine triphosphate. These processes may lead to translocation of bacteria from the gut and intestinal edema, predisposing patients to multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. The consequences of abdominal compartment syndrome are profound and affect many vital body systems. Hemodynamic, respiratory, renal, and neurological abnormalities are hallmarks of abdominal compartment syndrome. Medical management consists of urgent decompressive laparotomy. Nursing care involves vigilant monitoring for early detection, including serial measurements of intra-abdominal pressure.

Linea Alba Fasciotomy: A Novel Alternative in Trauma Patients with Secondary Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Duchesne ◽  
Meghan P. Howell ◽  
Calvin Eriksen ◽  
Georgia M. Wahl ◽  
Kelly V. Rennie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Linea Alba ◽  
Physiological Variables ◽  
Abdominal Hypertension ◽  
Polytrauma Patients ◽  
Abdominal Decompression ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Polytrauma patients needing aggressive resuscitation can develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) with subsequent secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (SACS). After patients fail medical therapy, decompressive laparotomy is the surgical last resort. In patients with severe pancreatitis SACS, the use of linea alba fasciotomy (LAF) is an effective intervention to lower IAH without the morbidity of laparotomy. A pilot study of LAF was designed to evaluate its benefit in patients with SACS polytrauma. We conducted an observational study of blunt injury polytrauma patients undergoing LAF. Variables measured before and after LAF included intra-abdominal pressure (IAP, mmHg), abdominal perfusion pressure (APP, mmHg), right ventricular end diastolic volume index (RVEDVI, mL/m2), and ejection fraction. Of the five trauma patients with SACS, the mean age was 36 ± 17, four (80%) male with an Injury Severity Score of 27 ± 9. Pre- and post-LAF, IAP was 20.6 ± 4.7 and 10.6 ± 2.7 ( P < 0.0001), APP 55.2 ± 5.5 and 77.6 ± 7.1 ( P < 0.0001), RVEDVI 86.4 ± 9.3 and 123.6 ± 11.9 ( P < 0.0001), and EF 27.6 ± 4.2 and 40.8 ± 5 ( P < 0.0001), respectively. One patient needed full decompression for bile ascites from unrecognized liver injury. Linea alba fasciotomy, as a first-line intervention before committing to full abdominal decompression in patients with SACS trauma, improved physiological variables without mortality Consideration for LAF as a bridge before full abdominal decompression needs further evaluation in patients with polytrauma SACS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document