Analysis of Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat BÜLBÜL ◽  
Metin UZUN ◽  
Semih AYANOĞLU ◽  
Yunus İMREN ◽  
Kahraman ÖZTÜRK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Surgery is no more effective than conservative treatment for Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552096669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robson Massi Bastos ◽  
Jorge Geraldo de Carvalho Júnior ◽  
Suellen Aline Martinez da Silva ◽  
Shirley Ferreira Campos ◽  
Matheus Vieira Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Quality Evidence

Objective: To summarize the effects of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the short, medium, and long term. Study Design: Systematic review Methods: The following databases were searched on 14/09/2020: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and PEDro. There were no date or language limits. The methodological quality assessment was performed using the PEDro scale and the quality of the evidence followed the GRADE recommendation. The outcomes pain, disability, and adverse effects were extracted. Results: Of 6264 initial studies, three met the full-text inclusion criteria. All studies were of good methodological quality. Follow up ranged from six months to two years, with 650 participants in total. The meta-analyses found no difference in disability between surgical versus conservative treatment, with a mean difference (MD) between groups of 3.91 points (95% CI –2.19 to 10.01) at six months, MD of 5.53 points (95% CI –3.11 to 14.16) at 12 months and 3.8 points (95% CI –6.0 to 13.6) at 24 months. The quality of the evidence (GRADE) varied from moderate to low across all comparisons. Conclusion: There is moderate-quality evidence that surgical treatment is not superior to conservative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the short term, and there is low-quality evidence that it is not superior in the medium term. Level of evidence: Therapy, level 1a. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019134118

scholarly journals Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Lindman ◽  
Sarantos Nikou ◽  
Axel Öhlin ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Olufemi Ayeni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the trends in the literature regarding surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to present which patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs) and surgical approaches are included. Methods This systematic review was conducted with the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, covering studies from 1999 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies with surgical treatment for FAIS, the use of PROMs as evaluation tool and studies in English. Exclusion criteria were studies with patients < 18 years, cohorts with < 8 patients, studies with primarily purpose to evaluate other diagnoses than FAIS and studies with radiographs as only outcomes without using PROMs. Data extracted were author, year, surgical intervention, type of study, level of evidence, demographics of included patients, and PROMs. Results The initial search yielded 2,559 studies, of which 196 were included. There was an increase of 2,043% in the number of studies from the first to the last five years (2004–2008)—(2016–2020). There were 135 (69%) retrospective, 55 (28%) prospective and 6 (3%) Randomized Controlled Trials. Level of evidence ranged from I-IV where Level III was most common (44%). More than half of the studies (58%) originated from USA. Arthroscopic surgery was the most common surgical treatment (85%). Mean follow-up was 27.0 months (± 17 SD), (range 1.5–120 months). Between 1–10 PROMs were included, and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was most commonly used (61%). Conclusion There has been a continuous increase in the number of published studies regarding FAIS with the majority evaluating arthroscopic surgery. The mHHS remains being the most commonly used PROM.

scholarly journals Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (22) ◽  
pp. 1605-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Peters ◽  
Alisha Laing ◽  
Courtney Emerson ◽  
Kelsey Mutchler ◽  
Thomas Joyce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Computer Search ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment ◽  
Study Inclusion

BackgroundThe purpose of this review was to analyse and report criteria used for open and arthroscopic surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).MethodsA librarian-assisted computer search of Medline, CINAHL and Embase for studies related to criterion for FAIS surgery was used in this study. Inclusion criteria included studies with the primary purpose of surgery or surgical outcomes for treatment of FAIS with and without labral tear, and reporting criteria for FAIS surgery.ResultsDiagnostic imaging was a criterion for surgery in 92% of the included studies, with alpha angle the most frequently reported (68% of studies) criterion. Reporting of symptoms was a criterion for surgery in 75%, and special tests a criterion in 70% of studies. Range-of-motion limitations were only a required criterion in 30%, only 12% of studies required intra-articular injection and 44% of studies described previously failed treatment (non-surgical or physiotherapist-led rehabilitation) as a criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging combined for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting.ConclusionDiagnostic imaging evidence of FAIS was the most commonly reported criterion for surgery. Only 56% of included studies utilised the combination of symptoms, clinical signs and diagnostic imaging for diagnosis of FAIS as suggested by the Warwick Agreement on FAIS meeting, and only 44% of studies had failed non-surgical treatment (and 18% a failed trial of physiotherapy) as a criterion for surgery.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Requiring Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. e070
Author(s):  
Natalie L. Leong ◽  
William Neal ◽  
Thomas Alter ◽  
Edward Beck ◽  
Shane J. Nho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Acetabular Labral Tear Dimensions and Number of Suture Anchors Used to Repair in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume D. Dumont ◽  
Matthew J. Pacana ◽  
Adam J. Money ◽  
Thomas J. Ergen ◽  
Allen J. Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Labral Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Labral Tears ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tear Size ◽  
Anterior Extent

AbstractFemoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is commonly associated with acetabular labral tears. Correction of impingement morphology and suture anchor repair of labral tears have demonstrated successful early and midterm patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the posterior and anterior extent and size of labral tears in patients with FAIS undergoing arthroscopic labral repair, and to evaluate the number of suture anchors required to repair these tears. The design of this study was retrospective case series (Level 4). A single surgeon's operative database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing primary arthroscopic hip labral repair between November 2014 and September 2019. Patient-specific factors and radiographic measurements were recorded. Arthroscopic findings including labral tear posterior and anterior extents, and the number of suture anchors utilized for the repair were recorded. Linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with labral tear size. The number of suture anchors used relative to labral tear size was calculated. Three-hundred and thirteen patients were included in the study. The mean posterior and anterior extent for labral tears were 11:22 ± 52 and 2:20 ± 34 minutes, respectively. Mean tear size was 2 hours, 58 minutes ± 45 minutes. The mean number of suture anchors utilized for labral repair was 3.1 ± 0.7. The mean number of anchors per hour of labral tear was 1.1 ± 0.3. Increased age, lateral center edge angle, and α angle were associated with larger labral tears. Our study found that acetabular labral tears associated with FAIS are, on average, 3 hours in size and centered in the anterosuperior quadrant of the acetabulum. Arthroscopic labral repair required 1.1 anchors per hour of tear size, resulting in a mean of 3.1 anchors per repair. Level of Evidence IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document