Principles of Digitalization of Legal Proceedings in Civil Cases and Economic Disputes

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (05-SPECIAL ISSUE) ◽  
pp. 387-392
Author(s):  
Elena Sergeevna Smagina ◽  
Antonina Golysheva ◽  
Elena Vadimovna Pitʾko ◽  
Eveniy Riazanov ◽  
Sergey Zinkovsky
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-223
Author(s):  
R.R. DOLOTIN

The search for an optimal balance between the result of legal proceedings and the way to achieve it is currently one of the most important areas of development of procedural legislation. In this regard, there is a need to use not only the general procedure for the consideration and resolution of cases, but also a special one, which contributes to the rational simplification and acceleration of procedures. In this sense, the study of the procedural form used in the claim and simplified proceedings is of particular value. The author comes to the conclusion that in simplified proceedings, a truncated procedural form is used, which is characterized by such manifestations of procedural economy as the absence of a preliminary meeting, summoning the parties to a court session, the prohibition of the court’s examination of evidence provided in violation of deadlines, making a decision without a reasoned part, etc. It is noted that the effectiveness of arbitration proceedings should not be achieved by violating the fundamental principles of civil proceedings. In conclusion, the author concludes that the procedural form should be defined as a system of scientifically grounded, normatively defined conditions of effective and correct resolution of civil cases, determined by legal relations to be protected.


Russian judge ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Daniil I. Krymskiy ◽  

The introduction of simplified forms of dispute resolution in courts is aimed at achieving the goals of reducing costs, reducing formalism, and speeding up the process of legal proceedings. Simplified proceedings at the present stage are acquiring a dominant position in the system of procedures for resolving cases, from this point of view, it is important to analyze these rules in the context of foreign legislation and law enforcement practice.


1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Quansah

Marriage as a social institution has been deliberately protectedas a matter of State policy. Such protection manifests itself in a variety of ways, one of which is the subject of this article. In an attempt to protect the sanctity of marriage, a rule evolved under which spouses cannot give evidence against each other in legal proceedings. In the words of that venerable English jurist, Coke, if this were not so “it might be a cause of implacable discord and dissension between the husband and the wife”. The rule shows itself in strange ways both in criminal and civil cases. For example, the law regards spouses as one person and as such they cannot conspire with each other. Although the institution has been on a slippery slope for a long time with the increasing prevalence of “cohabitation” it has shown remarkable resilience and most of the population still partake and support it. The British bequeathed the rules relating to competence of spouses to Botswana some decades ago and these have since been applied in their pristine purity although the legislature left an escape route by which they could be supplemented. It is this route for supplementation which has led to issues that need to be resolved. Some of these are explored in this article, after a brief historical background of the reception of the rules.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 243-249
Author(s):  
A. N. Goretskaya

The article deals the debated issues in determining the amount of compensation for inflicted moral suffering addressed in civil legal proceedings. The calculation of the benchmark equivalentfor moral damages is part of a forensic psychological examination, as well as the establishment of a fact whether the situation in the case is psychologically traumatic. The article analyzes different approaches to determining compensation in civil and criminal cases. It also studies legal norms that define the notion of guilt in the civil process, to some extent they contradict the existing methods of determining the fact ofmoral damages and the amount of the compensation for inflicted suffering. The article discusses the forms of the guilt of the one who inflicted the damage and the guilt of the plaintiff (the injured party), and they must be taken into account while determining the compensation amount, at the same time this data is determined by the court decision and, as a rule, an expert is not provided with this data before the decision is announced. The article concludes with emphasizing the importance of eliminating this contradiction and the necessity of creating new methods to solve this collision.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.S. Lavrovych ◽  
V.V. Hryha

The article is devoted to the comprehensive study of the legal nature, the essence and features of simplified proceedings in civil legal proceedings. The categories of civil cases that are to be considered in the order of simplified lawsuits are described. The author pays special attention to the analysis of the peculiarities of the procedure for consideration of cases in the order of simplified proceedings in civil legal proceedings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Terekhina ◽  
D.S. Oshevsky

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the problems occurring while using special psychological knowledge in civil legal proceedings of family disputes over children after divorce. Using civil cases and reviews on psychological evaluations done upon lawyers' requests the article shows that a major part of those evaluations is executed on a low professional level, doesn't meet necessary requirements which leads to their unsuitability as bases for making judicial decisions. The article identifies groups of typical mistakes of psychological evaluations of underage persons in the situation of family divorce. It also highlights in detail procedural and institutional, methodological, structural, and deontological mistakes. The articles offers steps to change the practice of using psychological knowledge in civil legal proceedings of protecting child's interests after divorce.


2020 ◽  
pp. 277-312
Author(s):  
Bernadette Rainey ◽  
Pamela McCormick ◽  
Clare Ovey

This chapter examines the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on the right to a fair trial in criminal and civil cases, explaining that Article 6 of ECHR holds that the Strasbourg Court has no jurisdiction to reopen national legal proceedings or to substitute its own findings of fact for the conclusions of national courts. The chapter examines the interpretation by the Strasbourg Court of the protections provided by Article 6 in the extensive jurisprudence on this Article and discusses issues concerning the overall requirements of a fair hearing, right of access to court, and the extraterritorial effect of Article 6.


Author(s):  
Bernadette Rainey ◽  
Elizabeth Wicks ◽  
Andclare Ovey

This chapter examines the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on the right to a fair trial in criminal and civil cases, explaining that Article 6 of ECHR holds that the Strasbourg Court has no jurisdiction to reopen national legal proceedings or to substitute its own findings of fact for the conclusions of national courts. It discusses issues concerning the overall requirements of a fair hearing, right of access to court, and the extraterritorial effect of Article 6.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Tatum ◽  
Dana Clark ◽  
Penelope S. Manasco ◽  
Megan McGugan ◽  
Chelsea Dumais ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 163-171
Author(s):  
M. G. Shcherbakovskiy

The article discusses the reasonsfor an expert to participate in legal proceedings. The gnoseological reason for that consists of the bad quality of materials subject to examination that renders the examination either completely impossible or compromises objective, reasoned and reliable assessment of the findings. The procedural reason consists ofa proscription for an expert to collect evidence himself or herself. The author investigates into the ways of how an expert can participate in legal proceedings. If the defense invites an expert to participate in the proceedings, then it is recommended that his or her involvement should be in the presence of attesting witnesses and recorded in the protocol. In the course of the legal proceedings an expert has the following tasks: adding initial data, acquiring new initial data, understanding the situation of the incident, acquiring new objects to be studied, including samples for examination. An expert’s participation in legal proceedings differs from the participation of a specialist or an examination on the scene of the incident. The author describes the tasks that an expert solves in the course of legal proceedings, the peculiarities ofan investigation experiment practices, the selection of samples for an examination, inspection, interrogation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document