scholarly journals Como o direito pensa: em busca de uma epistemologia construtivista do direito

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Gunther Teubner ◽  
Lui Martinez Laskowski ◽  
Angela Couto Machado Fonseca

Tradução para o português a partir de original em inglês (original: TEUBNER, G. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law. Law & Society Review, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 5, p. 727-757, 1989. doi:10.2307/3053760) [N. do E.].

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1017-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim J. Savelsberg ◽  
Terence Halliday ◽  
Sida Liu ◽  
Calvin Morrill ◽  
Carroll Seron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Marc Galanter ◽  
Maria Cecília Asperti ◽  
Daniela Gabbay ◽  
Natasha Schmitt Caccia Salinas ◽  
Paulo Eduardo Alves da Silva

Recognized as one of the central figures of the Law & Society and as one of the first editors of the Law & Society Review, Marc Galanter is the author of pioneer and internationally recognized studies on the legal system and patterns of litigation (including "Why the haves come out ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change", one of the most cited articles in legal literature), lawyers and legal culture, legal institutions and informal regulation, among others. In this interview, Galanter speaks mostly about his academic and professional trajectory, a narrative that is intertwined with the history of tha Law & Society movement itself and with some of the most important developments in American academia since the 60s to the present day. The author also talks about the growth of law firms (described in Tournament of Lawyers) and cultural perceptions currently surrounding lawyers and the legal profession. He discusses the importance of the studies he developed in India for his work, including the famous "Why the haves come out ahead", a piece that is still relevant in the current context.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document