Effect of moisture on sealing ability of root canal filling with different types of sealer through the glucose penetration model

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ah Jang ◽  
Hee-Lyang Kim ◽  
Mi-Ja Her ◽  
Kwang-Won Lee ◽  
Mi-Kyung Yu
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Soo-Hyuk Lee ◽  
Soram Oh ◽  
Adel Saeed Al-Ghamdi ◽  
Ayman Omar Mandorah ◽  
Kee-Yeon Kum ◽  
...  

The objective of root canal obturation is to achieve a fluid-tight seal. Recently, GuttaFlow bioseal (GB), a root canal sealer composed of polydimethylsiloxane, gutta-percha particles, and bioactive glass ceramics, has been developed, to enhance the sealing ability of root canal filling material. The objective of this study was to assess the sealing ability of GB using a subnanoliter-scaled fluid-flow measuring device and to compare with that of AH Plus (AH). The fluid flow in root canal-filled teeth using either gutta-percha cone (GP) with AH (GAR; n = 10) or GP with GB (GBR; n = 10) and in GP inserted in AH blocks (GA; n = 10) or GP inserted in GB blocks (GB; n = 10) was measured. In addition, fluid flow in sealer blocks of AH (A; n = 10) and GB (B; n = 10), which served as negative controls, was measured. Root canal-filled teeth using GP without any sealer (GR) acted as positive controls (n = 10). The leakage was obtained by calculating the volume of moved water by time (s), after stabilization of the fluid flow was achieved. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. A p value less than 0.00238 (0.05/21) was considered significantly different. The mean leakages (nL/s) in the groups are as follows: GAR, 0.0958 ± 0.0543; GBR, 0.0223 ± 0.0246; GA, 0.0644 ± 0.0803; GB, 0.0267 ± 0.0182; A, 0.0055 ± 0.0057; B, 0.0052 ± 0.005; and GR, 0.2892 ± 0.3018. The mean leakage in the GBR group was lower than that in the GAR group (p = 0.001), while the mean leakages in the GA and GB groups were not significantly different. GuttaFlow bioseal can be useful in single-cone obturation technique.


2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berkan Celikten ◽  
Ceren F. Uzuntas ◽  
Ayse I. Orhan ◽  
Pelin Tufenkci ◽  
Melis Misirli ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (51) ◽  
pp. 10516-10519
Author(s):  
Froughreyhani Mohammad ◽  
Salem Milani Amin ◽  
Rahimi Saeed ◽  
Shakouie Sahar ◽  
Fateh Somaieh

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-63
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohammed Abd Elhamid Sobieh ◽  
Hossam Mohammed Essam El Din Tawfik ◽  
Shehab El Din Saber

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 582-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki IMAMURA ◽  
Yumi TANAKA ◽  
Akiko NAGAI ◽  
Kimihiro YAMASHITA ◽  
Yuzo TAKAGI

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 694-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Vujaskovic ◽  
Nevenka Teodorovic

Introduction. An ideal endodontic sealer should adhere firmly both to dentin and to gutta-percha. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesion of the root canal filling to dentin and gutta-percha using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods. The sealing ability of endodontic sealers to dentinal walls of the root canal was assessed in recently extracted human single canal premolars. Twenty teeth were prepared using the crown-down technique and irrigated with 3% NaOCl. A total of 20 samples were divided into two groups. The root canals were obturated using Ketac-Endo Aplicap and GutaFlow. The sealing ability and adhesion properties at the sealer-dentin interface were studied using SEM and the results were rated from 1 to 3; extremely good adhesion (rated 1), good adhesion (rated 2) and a relatively good adhesion (rated 3). Results. The results showed extremely good adhesion on Ketac-Endo and GuttaFlow dentin interface. GuttaFlow has strong adhesion (rated 1) to gutta-percha in comparison with Ketac-Endo to gutta-percha interface (rated 2). Conclusion. New GuttaFlow filling material has a strong sealing ability and excellent adhesion to dentinal walls and gutta-percha cones. Ketac-Endo showed excellent bond to dentin with a slightly weaker adhesion capacity to the gutta-percha cones in comparison to GuttaFlow.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Washio ◽  
Morotomi ◽  
Yoshii ◽  
Kitamura

Endodontic treatment for a tooth with damaged dental pulp aims to both prevent and cure apical periodontitis. If the tooth is re-infected as a result of a poorly obturated root canal, periapical periodontitis may set-in due to invading bacteria. To both avoid any re-infection and improve the success rate of endodontic retreatment, a treated root canal should be three-dimensionally obturated with a biocompatible filling material. Recently, bioactive glass, one of the bioceramics, is focused on the research area of biocompatible biomaterials for endodontics. Root canal sealers derived from bioactive glass-based have been developed and applied in clinical endodontic treatments. However, at present, there is little evidence about the patient outcomes, sealing mechanism, sealing ability, and removability of the sealers. Herein, we have developed a bioactive glass-based root canal sealer and provided evidence concerning its physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, sealing ability, and removability. We also review the classification of bioceramics and characteristics of bioactive glass. Additionally, we describe the application of bioactive glass to facilitate the development of a new root canal sealer. Furthermore, this review shows the potential application of bioactive glass-based cement as a root canal filling material in the absence of semisolid core material.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mubarak Al-Kahtani

ABSTRACT A review of the literature on the use of carrier based obturation materials focusing on Thermafil and Resilon based obturator (RealSeal 1) are presented in this article. The review addressed the history, apical leakage, coronal leakage, biocompatibility, sealing ability and clinical success of Thermafil and RealSeal 1. Based on the studies gathered, this review concluded that both treatment techniques (Thermafil and RealSeal 1) did not provide excellent apical sealing ability. More research should be done to try to overcome their main drawback, its sealing ability. How to cite this article Al-Kahtani AM. Carrier-based Root Canal Filling Materials: A Literature Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(4):777-783.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document