scholarly journals Sealing Ability of AH Plus and GuttaFlow Bioseal

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Soo-Hyuk Lee ◽  
Soram Oh ◽  
Adel Saeed Al-Ghamdi ◽  
Ayman Omar Mandorah ◽  
Kee-Yeon Kum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Glass Ceramics ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Measuring Device ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
The Mean

The objective of root canal obturation is to achieve a fluid-tight seal. Recently, GuttaFlow bioseal (GB), a root canal sealer composed of polydimethylsiloxane, gutta-percha particles, and bioactive glass ceramics, has been developed, to enhance the sealing ability of root canal filling material. The objective of this study was to assess the sealing ability of GB using a subnanoliter-scaled fluid-flow measuring device and to compare with that of AH Plus (AH). The fluid flow in root canal-filled teeth using either gutta-percha cone (GP) with AH (GAR; n = 10) or GP with GB (GBR; n = 10) and in GP inserted in AH blocks (GA; n = 10) or GP inserted in GB blocks (GB; n = 10) was measured. In addition, fluid flow in sealer blocks of AH (A; n = 10) and GB (B; n = 10), which served as negative controls, was measured. Root canal-filled teeth using GP without any sealer (GR) acted as positive controls (n = 10). The leakage was obtained by calculating the volume of moved water by time (s), after stabilization of the fluid flow was achieved. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. A p value less than 0.00238 (0.05/21) was considered significantly different. The mean leakages (nL/s) in the groups are as follows: GAR, 0.0958 ± 0.0543; GBR, 0.0223 ± 0.0246; GA, 0.0644 ± 0.0803; GB, 0.0267 ± 0.0182; A, 0.0055 ± 0.0057; B, 0.0052 ± 0.005; and GR, 0.2892 ± 0.3018. The mean leakage in the GBR group was lower than that in the GAR group (p = 0.001), while the mean leakages in the GA and GB groups were not significantly different. GuttaFlow bioseal can be useful in single-cone obturation technique.

scholarly journals Comparison of apical sealing ability of resected mineral trioxide aggregate, gutta-percha and a resin-based root canal filling material (resilon)

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (51) ◽  
pp. 10516-10519
Author(s):  
Froughreyhani Mohammad ◽  
Salem Milani Amin ◽  
Rahimi Saeed ◽  
Shakouie Sahar ◽  
Fateh Somaieh
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability

scholarly journals Analysis of sealing ability of root canal sealers using scanning electronic microscopy technique

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 694-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Vujaskovic ◽  
Nevenka Teodorovic
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Scanning Electronic Microscopy ◽  
Electronic Microscopy ◽  
Good Adhesion ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Adhesion Properties ◽  
Microscopy Technique ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability

Introduction. An ideal endodontic sealer should adhere firmly both to dentin and to gutta-percha. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesion of the root canal filling to dentin and gutta-percha using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods. The sealing ability of endodontic sealers to dentinal walls of the root canal was assessed in recently extracted human single canal premolars. Twenty teeth were prepared using the crown-down technique and irrigated with 3% NaOCl. A total of 20 samples were divided into two groups. The root canals were obturated using Ketac-Endo Aplicap and GutaFlow. The sealing ability and adhesion properties at the sealer-dentin interface were studied using SEM and the results were rated from 1 to 3; extremely good adhesion (rated 1), good adhesion (rated 2) and a relatively good adhesion (rated 3). Results. The results showed extremely good adhesion on Ketac-Endo and GuttaFlow dentin interface. GuttaFlow has strong adhesion (rated 1) to gutta-percha in comparison with Ketac-Endo to gutta-percha interface (rated 2). Conclusion. New GuttaFlow filling material has a strong sealing ability and excellent adhesion to dentinal walls and gutta-percha cones. Ketac-Endo showed excellent bond to dentin with a slightly weaker adhesion capacity to the gutta-percha cones in comparison to GuttaFlow.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Removing Thermafil and GuttaCore from Straight Root Canal Systems Using a Novel Non-Surgical Root Canal Re-Treatment System: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1266
Author(s):  
Vicente Faus-Llácer ◽  
Rubén Pérez ◽  
Ignacio Faus-Matoses ◽  
Celia Ruiz-Sánchez ◽  
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Treatment System ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Canal Systems ◽  
Ah Plus

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an XP-endo non-surgical root canal re-treatment system in removing both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. The study was performed on 20 single-rooted upper teeth, which were randomly allocated into the following study groups: Group A, Thermafil and AH Plus sealer (n = 10); Group B, GuttaCore and AH Plus sealer (n = 10). Before and after the non-surgical root canal re-treatment procedure, the samples were submitted for a micro-CT analysis. The volume of the root canal filling material (mm3), the volume of the remaining root canal filling material (mm3) and the time (minutes) needed to remove the root canal filling material were also recorded. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the results. No statistically significant differences were found between the volume of the remaining root canal filling material in the GuttaCore and Thermafil root canal filling systems at the coronal third (p = 0.782), middle third (p = 0.838) or apical third (p = 0.882) of the straight root canal systems; however, the GuttaCore required a statistically significant (p = 0.037) shorter amount of time (4.72 ± 0.76 min) to be removed than the Thermafil carrier-based root canal filling material (5.92 ± 1.42 min). The XP-endo Finisher non-surgical endodontic re-treatment system removes both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems, although removal of the GuttaCore gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling material required less time.

scholarly journals Physicochemical Properties of Calcium Phosphate Based Coating on Gutta-Percha Root Canal Filling

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afaf Al-Haddad ◽  
Muralithran G. Kutty ◽  
Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim ◽  
Zeti Adura Che Ab Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Calcium Phosphate Coating ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Coating Method ◽  
Root Dentin

Dental Gutta-percha (GP) is a polymer based standard root canal filling material that has been widely used in dentistry. However, it has an inadequate sealing ability and adhesion to root dentin. The aim of this study is to coat GP with a bioactive material to enhance its sealing ability and adhesion to the root sealer and subsequently to the root dentin. The choice of coating method is limited by the nature of GP as it requires a technique that is not governed by high temperatures or uses organic solvents. In this study, biomimetic coating technique using 1.5 Tas-simulated body fluids (SBF) was employed to coat the treated GP cones. The coated samples were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). The presence of hydroxyl, carbonate, and phosphate groups was detected by FTIR while the formation of hydroxyapatite (HA)/calcium phosphate was confirmed with XRD. FESEM revealed uniform, thin, and crystalline HA calcium phosphate coating. The adhesion of the coating to the GP substrate was assessed with microscratch technique. It was viable with cohesive failure mode. In conclusion, Tas-SBF is able to coat pretreated GP cones with a crystalline apatitic calcium phosphate layer.

scholarly journals Healing of a tooth with an overinstrumented apex, extensive transportation and periapical lesion using a 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug: an 8-year follow-up report

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-611
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Araújo Souza ◽  
Yara T. Corrêa Silva-Sousa ◽  
Suely Colombo ◽  
Maurício Lago ◽  
Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Apical Constriction ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Open Apices ◽  
Canal Transportation

Besides the risk of filling material extrusion throughout the apex, a satisfactory apical seal can be difficult to achieve in canals with open apices or iatrogenic enlargements of the apical constriction. These situations pose a challenge to root canal filling. This paper describes the root canal filling of a maxillary right canine with an overinstrumented apex, complete loss of the apical stop, extensive canal transportation and apical periodontitis. A 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug was placed before root canal filling. The plug was made by soaking paper points with saline, dipping the points in calcium hydroxide powder and then applying it to the apex several times, until a consistent apical plug was obtained. The canal was then irrigated with saline in order to remove any residual calcium hydroxide from the root canal walls, dried with paper points and obturated with an inverted #80 gutta-percha cone and zinc oxide-eugenol based sealer by the lateral condensation technique. An 8-year radiographic follow-up showed formation of mineralized tissue sealing the apical foramen, apical remodeling and no signs of apical periodontitis.

Coronal Leakage of Teeth Root-Filled With Gutta-Percha or Resilon Root Canal Filling Material

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 879-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Pitout ◽  
Theunis Gerhardus Oberholzer ◽  
Elaine Blignaut ◽  
Julitha Molepo
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha

Microbial Leakage of Gutta-percha and Resilon™ Root Canal Filling Material: A Comparative Study Using a new Homogeneous Assay for Sequence Detection

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiano Pasqualini ◽  
Nicola Scotti ◽  
Livio Mollo ◽  
Elio Berutti ◽  
Emma Angelini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Sequence Detection ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Homogeneous Assay

scholarly journals Micro-CT Evaluation of Root Filling Removal after Three Stages of Retreatment Procedure

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
Manuela Favarin Santini ◽  
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago ◽  
Jefferson Ricardo Pereira ◽  
Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Tomography System ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Ct Evaluation ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Post Hoc

The aim of this study was to quantify the residual filling material after filling removal, re-preparation with rotary or reciprocating files and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Twenty maxillary molars were prepared using ProTaper instruments up to F1. The teeth were filled with AH Plus and ProTaper gutta-percha points using the single-cone technique. Thereafter, the specimens were scanned using a micro-computed tomography system (Micro-CT #1). Then, the root canal filling was removed using ProTaper Retreatment files, and a new scan was performed (Micro-CT #2). The specimens were divided into two groups according to the instrument used for re-preparation: ProTaper rotary or WaveOne reciprocating files (Micro-CT #3). Finally, PUI was performed, and a new micro-CT scan was performed (Micro-CT #4). Intragroup and intergroup analyses were performed using Friedman and Dunn's post hoc test and the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, respectively. Palatal canal presented the highest volume of residual filling material in all stages of endodontic retreatment (p<0.05). The main reduction of filling volume was achieved after using ProTaper Retreament (p<0.05). The amount of remaining filling material after using ProTaper Retreatment was similar to that achieved with rotary and reciprocating files and after PUI (p>0.05). Rotary and reciprocating files achieved similar removal of the root canal filling (p>0.05). The greatest reduction in filling material was achieved after using ProTaper Retreatment files. Rotary and reciprocating instruments and PUI did not improve the removal of root canal filling materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document