Response of the official opponent on the thesis Teplyasin Pavel Vladimirovich “European prison systems (theoretical applied and comparative legal study)”, submitted for conferring an academic degree of a doctor of law on the specialty 12.00.08 - criminal law and criminology; criminal and penal law (Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russian Federation, 2018. 496 p.)

Author(s):  
Вячеслав Иванович Селиверстов
Author(s):  
Aleksander Shesler

At a meeting of the Council D 203.012.02 for the defense of dissertations for the degree of candidate of sciences, for the degree of doctor of sciences created on the basis of the Federal State Budget Institution for Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation”, on February 14, 2020, Dvorzhitskaya Marina Andreyevna defended her dissertation for the degree of candidate of legal sciences on the topic "Responsibility for implication to crime in criminal law" in the specialty 12.00.08-criminal law and criminology; criminal executive law. The Dissertation Council, chaired by the chairman of the Dissertation Council D 203.012.02, Doctor of Law, Professor S. A. Denisov, decided that the dissertation of M. A. Dvorzhitskaya is a scientific qualification work, that is essential for the science of criminal law and complies with the requirements established by the Regulation on the awarding of scientific degrees. The Council decided to award M.A. Dvorzhitskaya the degree of candidate of legal sciences in the specialty 12.00.08. The article is a review of the dissertation of the official opponent, in which the structure and content of M. A. Dvorzhitskaya's dissertation are analyzed.


Author(s):  
A. A. Kashkarov ◽  
D. A. Poshtaruk

A criminal and legal analysis of the objective and subjective signs, characterizing the connivance to the crime is made in the publication. The study found that connivance in a crime may be characteristic of various criminal law institutions, such as implication in a crime and complicity in a crime. In addition, the presented arguments show that connivance as a criminally punishable act may be associated with non-interference with unlawful activities that do not constitute a crime. The analysis shows that connivance in a crime can have a selfish purpose. It is noted that connivance in a crime is significantly different from other forms of implication in a crime, namely concealment of a crime and failure to report a crime. The subject of connivance in a crime is a person endowed with special powers to prevent, document and register crimes or offences. The article discloses that there is no special penal provision in the current Act of Criminal Responsibility of the Russian Federation that criminalizes it. The exception is the disposition of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code of RF, which contains an indication of connivance as a sign characterizing the objective side of receiving a bribe.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Vladimir I. Mayorov ◽  
◽  
Viktor V. Denisenko ◽  

The reviewed work is devoted to the administrative and legal ban on driving while intoxicated in the Russian Federation. The author proposes to optimize the administrative and jurisdictional activities of the internal Affairs bodies to improve the administrative and legal counteraction to negative manifestations, such as driving while intoxicated and their consequences in the form of road accidents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document