Anticipated Knowledge Worker Mobility And R&D Dynamism: Evidence From A Natural Experiment

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 13754
Author(s):  
Aman Asija ◽  
Dimo P. Ringov
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wright ◽  
Valentina Tartari ◽  
Kenneth G. Huang ◽  
Francesco Di Lorenzo ◽  
Janet Bercovitz

2022 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 464-475
Author(s):  
João J. Ferreira ◽  
Cristina I. Fernandes ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Hussain G. Rammal

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haemin Dennis Park ◽  
Michael D. Howard ◽  
David M. Gomulya

Author(s):  
William Viney

Stephen Jay Gould, the biologist and author, once joked that were he an identical twin raised separately from his brother they could ‘hire ourselves out to a host of social scientists and practically name our fee’. In order to monetise Gould’s fantasy, one would want a form of twinship that could operate according to evidential, experimental, somatic and circumstantial ideals. And Gould admits that he and his brother would need to be viewed as ‘the only really adequate natural experiment for separating genetic from environmental effects in humans’. This chapter seeks to interrogate the evidential and experimental circumstances that may underpin the comic quips that guide modern biology. In human genetics, twins are used as experimental bodies that are made to matter in particular ways and for particular people; they become newly ‘animate’ for being enrolled into scientific research. Raised in cultures assumed to be alike or dissimilar, isolated by researchers for being valuable in the measured disentanglement of assembled molecular agents (which are sometimes distinguished from an assemblage referred to as an ‘environment’), twins achieve a status of experimental significance not just for what they do but also for what they are taken to be.


Author(s):  
Madeline Y. Hsu

This chapter analyzes immigration reform and the knowledge worker recruitment aspects of the Hart–Celler Act of 1965 to track the intensifying convergence of educational exchange programs, economic nationalism, and immigration reform. During the Cold War, the State Department expanded cultural diplomacy programs so that the numbers of international students burgeoned, particularly in the fields of science. Although the programs were initially conceived as a way of instilling influence over the future leaders of developing nations, international students, particularly from Taiwan, India, and South Korea, took advantage of minor changes in immigration laws and bureaucratic procedures that allowed students, skilled workers, and technical trainees to gain legal employment and eventually permanent residency and thereby remain in the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document