scholarly journals Reviewer Acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 8, No. 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Cathy Taylor

Reviewer acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2019

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Cathy Taylor

Reviewer acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2018


Author(s):  
Zitong Gao

Macquarie Dictionary define ‘Risk’ as the chance of an adverse event depending on the circumstances. In the field of engineering, the risk is often described as a specific unwanted event and including the consequences or loss. Usually residual risk from civil engineering project would lead to serious effects. The control of residual risk is an important subject in modern civil engineering management research. In this paper, a residual risk controlling methods will be present. Firstly, the definition and other mentioned concepts will be introduced. It includes the definition of residual risk and other concepts of risk that are often confused. Next, basic ways of dealing risk will be mentioned.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Paige Dou

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2017


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Paige Dou

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016


Designs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
A. Georges L. Romme ◽  
Dimo Dimov

Design science (DS) approaches have been emerging in engineering, management and other disciplines operating at the interface between design research and the natural or social sciences. Research informed by DS is challenging because it involves “mixing oil with water”, using a famous phrase of Herbert Simon. A key challenge here is the dual role of theory: one can develop a “theory of” any empirical phenomenon to explain its characteristics and outcomes, or alternatively, develop a “theory for” generating this phenomenon, focused on solving problems and enlarging possibilities. To clearly distinguish these two perspectives, we talk about theorizing in relation to theory-of and framing related to theory-for. A state-of-the-art review of how DS is applied by management researchers results in two main findings. First, explicit (re)framing efforts appear to be highly instrumental in challenging a given theoretical paradigm and thereby reduce the risk of being constrained to it; these findings confirm the generative nature of design activity. Moreover, many studies reviewed draw on knowledge formats that synthesize descriptive-explanatory and prescriptive-normative knowledge. Our main findings are subsequently integrated into a DS methodology, which may especially be of interest to design-oriented disciplines that tend to adopt a rather intuitive (undefined) notion of theory.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Paige Dou

<p><em>Engineering Management Research</em> wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal are greatly appreciated.</p><p><em>Engineering Management Research </em>is recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please find the application form and details at http://www.ccsenet.org/reviewer and e-mail the completed application form to [email protected].</p><p><strong>Reviewers for Volume 4, Number 2</strong></p><p>Kenneth Donald Mackenzie, University of Kansas, United States</p><p>Suman Niranjan, Savannah State University, United States</p><p>Noorliza Karia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia</p><p>Santosh Banadahally M, Chinmayi Research and Consulting, India</p><p>Juan Ramón Trapero Arenas, University of Castilla, Spain</p><p>Jingzheng Ren, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark</p><p>Anissa Frini, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Canada</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Paige Dou

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Engineering Management Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document