scholarly journals Study on the Influence of Foreign Direct Investment on Chinese Foreign Trade

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengchun Ding ◽  
Hongxin Li
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Direct Investment

scholarly journals La importancia de la inversión extranjera directa en México

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. De la Garza
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Trade Balance ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
National Development ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Manufacturing Productivity

Abstract: The Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has had important consequences in the Mexican economy, along the positive effects at the same time can be indicated the contributions in manufacturing, productivity, wages, employment and foreign trade; also some negative consequences have appeared, between the displacement of the internal savings and the deterioration in trade balance are one among the most important. Nevertheless, the general conclusion reflects the positive effects are enough to promote the hosting to new investments inthe national territory.Key words: Foreign Direct Investment, national development, Foreign Direct investment consequencesResumen: La inversión extranjera directa ha tenido importantes consecuencias en la economía mexicana, entre los efectos positivos de la misma se pueden señalar las contribuciones en la producción, productividad, salarios, empleo y el comercio exterior, pero también se han presentado algunas consecuencias negativas, entre las cuales el desplazamiento del ahorro interno y el deterioro en la balanza comercial son las más importantes. Sin embargo, el balancegeneral muestra que los efectos positivos son lo suficientemente satisfactorios para promover la llegada de nuevas inversiones al territorio nacional.Palabras clave: Inversión Extranjera Directa, desarrollo nacional, consecuencias de la Inversión Extranjera Directa

scholarly journals Safeguarding Croatian Strategic Industries Within the Scope of the EU Foreign Direct Investment Regime

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-149
Author(s):  
Kristijan Poljanec ◽  
Tomislav Jakšić
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Far East ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Legal Tradition ◽  
Member States ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Regulatory Changes ◽  
Legislative Proposals

A European Union (EU)-wide screening regime entered into force in October 2020, marking the turning point in the Member States’ investment relations with third countries, most notably, the emerging economies of the Far East. Most Central and Eastern European (CEE) states have recently embraced novel screening solutions; some legislative proposals are still pending in a few states. These regulatory changes are the result of the socio-economic turmoil caused by the COVID-19 epidemic, which threatens a major fire sale of resources that are deemed critical for the Member States’ national security and public order. In this paper, the authors examine the existing screening mechanisms regarding foreign direct investment (FDI) in five EU countries: Austria, Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, and Poland. Given the apparent lack of comprehensive FDI screening mechanisms in Croatia, the authors consider that the findings of this comparative analysis could help Croatian legislator establish a comprehensive legal regime for FDI pouring into Croatian strategic industries. This paper argues that Croatia should introduce novel screening mechanisms along the lines of the Germanic legal tradition, most notably, the CEE and the German foreign trade and payments law. The authors suggest potential solutions de lege ferenda that would fit the scope and objectives of the screening regulation. Following the introduction, the second section of the paper glances through FDI screening mechanisms in four CEE countries. In the third section, the paper revisits the existing Croatian legislation on FDI control. The fourth section considers possible amendments thereof within the context of the German foreign trade and payments law. The fifth section summarises and concludes the paper.

Chinese Foreign Trade

1992 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 691-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas R. Lardy
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Financial Markets ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
International Financial Markets ◽  
Domestic Economy ◽  
Trade Volume ◽  
Reform Era

China's opening to the outside world was perhaps the most visible of its reforms of the 1980s. China's international trade volume grew dramatically, it attracted tens of billions of dollars of foreign direct investment and it became an active borrower in international financial markets. In contrast to the pre-reform era, foreign trade grew more rapidly than the domestic economy and in some regions of the country it appeared that it had become a powerful engine of growth, accelerating not only the speed of domestic development but the pace of structural and technical transformation as well.

scholarly journals Foreign Direct Investment and Trade—Between Complementarity and Substitution. Evidence from European Union Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Marian Catalin Voica ◽  
Mirela Panait ◽  
Eglantina Hysa ◽  
Arjona Cela ◽  
Otilia Manta
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Trade Flow ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Host Countries ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Visegrad Group

This aim of this work is to study the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade. FDI is a driving force for economic growth for host countries. The positive effects of FDI are seen in many aspects of the economy. However, the implications of FDI on foreign trade are questionable. Therefore, this study uses a Granger causality technique to test whether the relationship between FDI and foreign trade is complementary or substitutive. The findings of this study indicate that this relationship appears to be complementary, and FDI investment does cause an increase in trade flow in the countries that are taken into consideration. This research aims to make a comparison between the relations of FDI flows of three groups of countries from the European Union (EU)—Romania and Bulgaria, the Visegrád Group and the Euro area—for the period of 2005 to 2019. However, the results indicate that this link between the variables is not yet found for the three group of countries, and further research is required in this aspect. This leads to the conclusion that the FDI impact on foreign trade of the host country depends on the type of investment and absorptive capacity of the receiver, the economic development of host and home countries, and not every type of FDI leads to more trade.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document