scholarly journals The Effects of Merger and Acquisition Announcements on the Security Prices of Bidding Firms and Target Firms in Asia

Author(s):  
Anson Wong ◽  
Kui Yin Cheung
Author(s):  
Ilona Babenko ◽  
Fangfang Du ◽  
Yuri Tserlukevich

We analyze how employee compensation contracts of target firms affect merger terms and outcomes. Using unique data from merger agreements, we document that in 80.0% of all merger and acquisition (M&A) deals, at least some of the target’s employee stock options (ESOs) are canceled by the acquirer and not replaced by new equity-based grants. Contract modifications reduce the value of ESOs by 38.4% in the average M&A deal. Further, the combined merger returns are larger when employees experience greater losses. Overall, our results indicate that the benefits of reducing the number of ESOs outweigh the potential negative effects on firm value.


ILR Review ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Becker

This paper tests the hypothesis that the substantial gains enjoyed by shareholders in target firms during the corporate acquisition boom of the 1980s reflected, in part, shareholders' recouping of the value of “rents” (in the form of wage premiums, higher fringe benefits, and constraints on managerial authority) held by unionized labor. Analyzing data on the merger and acquisition experience of nearly 300 large publicly traded target firms during the period 1982–86, the author finds, consistent with that hypothesis, that shareholders' average returns from takeover activity were higher in unionized target firms (41%) than in nonunion target firms (35%). For unionized workers, these effects are equivalent to an annualized employee “loss” approaching 8% of annual earnings, or 50% of the wage premium conventionally associated with union coverage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document