scholarly journals The Impact of Single and Multiple Mergers and Acquisitions on Shareholders’ Wealth of UK Bidder Firms

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
George Giannopoulos ◽  
Ehsan Khansalar ◽  
Patel Neel

This study investigates the impact of takeover announcements on UK acquirer shareholders’ wealth during the period 2002-2006. More specifically, it is investigated whether the impact of single acquirers on shareholders’ wealth is significantly different from the impact of multiple acquirers. Findings suggest that acquirer shareholders experience positive abnormal returns during the announcement period. Moreover, the results indicate single acquirers consistently outperform multiple acquirers when testing for deal characteristics such as: payment method (cash or equity), target status (public or private), target location (domestic or cross-border) and industry relatedness (specification or diversification). Performance declines with sequential acquisitions due to merger programme announcement hypothesis. Successful first time acquirers suffer from hubris whilst unsuccessful first time acquirers learn from their experiences suggested by the organisation learning hypothesis but go on to suffer from hubris. Acquisitions of private firms yield significant abnormal returns whereas public acquisitions reduce the value of UK acquirers. The effect of cash and equity, domestic and foreign, related and unrelated takeovers are inconclusive for the short-term windows investigated by this study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Giannopoulos ◽  
Andrew Holt ◽  
Ehsan Khansalar ◽  
Patrick Mogoya

This study investigates how mergers and acquisitions (M&A) affect the wealth of shareholders of public firms in the United States (U.S). More specifically, it investigates whether the nature of the bid, the payment method used, and the type of M&A have implications for shareholders of U.S bidding firms. The study analyses 352 mergers and acquisitions in the U.S during the period 1999-2008, and its results indicate that bidding firms suffer significant negative buy-and-hold abnormal returns in the three years period after a M&A announcement. The results also suggest that, in the long-run, hostile bids and cash-financed bidders outperform friendly bids and stock-funded bidders, respectively. Furthermore, the study also finds that in the long-run bidder firms that focus on industry specialisation within their M&A targets significantly outperform firms that adopt a more diversified strategy. The analysis also investigates the effects of M&A specialisation/diversification in six different sectors, and finds that specialised bidders outperform diversified bidders in four sectors: consumer & basic materials, energy & utilities, communications and technology. Furthermore, bidder firms in the financial services sector perform significantly better when diversifying into other sectors, while the performance of bidder firms in the industrial sector appears unaffected by the degree of M&A specialisation or diversification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-177
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Yousef

This study investigates the impact of acquirer bidding experience on acquiring abnormal returns based on empirical evidence from a large sample of 10,880 bidders making 23,852 deals from G-7 countries. Both event study and regressions analysis have been used to examine the impact of acquirer bidding experience on acquirer returns. The findings show that “single acquirers” achieve higher returns, with a cumulative average abnormal return (CAAR) of 3.354%, but this number tends to decrease with increasing numbers of previous bids. In addition, the results of the bivariate analysis demonstrate that a single acquisition alone generates greater abnormal returns than those which are part of a series of acquisitions, with very robust results even after accounting for additional heterogeneity in payment method, target status and country/industry diversification. The findings of the multivariate analysis also confirm that serial acquirers are associated with significantly lower abnormal returns. This evidence conflicts with the notion that more experience with mergers and acquisitions (M&As) will correspond to improve target valuation and thus lead to more profitable agreements. In contrast, my findings imply that shareholder wealth is destroyed by serial acquirers, which suggests that the goal of maximising firm value is not always the sole motivation for engaging in M&A activities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 994-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malek Alsharairi ◽  
Emma L. Black ◽  
Christoph Hofer ◽  
Radhi Al-Hamadeen

This paper empirically examines the post-merger performance of a sample of 1,320 European mergers and acquisitions deals. Specifically, we investigate the impact of pre-merger earnings management of acquirers on both the short-term and long-term post-merger performance, for M&A deals completed between 2003-2012, considering both the form of payment and the target firm’s listing status. The findings suggest that acquirers report higher abnormal accruals before those deals where they pay with their stock and the target firms are private. The reported evidence suggests that, as a consequence, investors correct for these efforts in the long-term post-merger period – usually within the first 12 months. Moreover, acquirers are likely to experience positive abnormal returns in case of bidding for private targets, whereas negative abnormal returns are documented in case of a publicly traded target, respectively.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Farhan Chaudhry

The current study investigates short-term abnormal returns of emerging countries multinationals acquirers on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging and developed countries. For this objective, the current study employs market return model approach and then uses the event study to estimate short-term abnormal returns of the emerging countries acquirers and used daily data for the period of January 01, 2010 to March 31, 2018. Statistical results lead to conclude that shareholders of the emerging countries acquirers earn short-term positive and statistically significant abnormal returns on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging countries. Similarly, results conclude that shareholders of the acquiring firms of the emerging countries earn short-term positive and statistically significant returns on cross-border acquisitions in developed countries. These return patterns of the emerging countries multinational companies (EMNCs) on cross-border acquisitions in developing and developed countries are not like abnormal short-term abnormal return patterns of the developed countries multinational companies (MNCs) on cross-border acquisitions. The current study also concludes that factors such as political stability has inverse, legal framework inverse though insignificant, size of emerging countries acquirers direct, leverage negative, and ownership no impact on short-term abnormal returns of EMNCs proxied by CAR (-1, 1) on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging countries. Moreover, concludes that factors such as political stability, legal framework, and size of emerging countries acquirers have inverse, leverage direct, ownership has no effect on short-term abnormal returns of EMNCs proxied by CAR (-1, 1) on cross-border acquisitions in developed countries. The implications of the current study are of great importance both for the acquirers and investors of the emerging countries. Therefore, investors can insight short-term abnormal return patterns on the announcement of cross-border acquisitions by the EMNCs in other emerging and developed countries. Further, implications of the current study can help to anticipate response of the market participants on the news of cross-border acquisitions by the EMNCs in developing and developed countries. Henceforth, keeping in view the short- term positive abnormal pattern of the acquirers of the emerging countries multinationals on cross-border acquisitions, smart investment decisions can be made to achieve synergies, efficiencies, access on skilled labor, access on low cost capital, higher sales, and access on technology that will ultimately increase the wealth of the shareholders. Limitations of the current study are to cross-border acquisitions of the emerging countries multinationals in developing and developed countries, but more research work can be undertaken to investigate the impact of industry-wise cross-border acquisitions. Also, current study is limited to examine the cross-border acquisitions of the emerging countries multinationals of the public companies in other developing and developed countries, however more empirical research can be undertaken to examine the effects of cross-border acquisitions in private sectors. More empirical research can be undertaken by adding the impact of cross-border mergers by the emerging countries multinationals on short-term abnormal returns in developing and developed countries. Similarly, research work can be undertaken to examine the long run impact of the cross-border mergers and acquisitions by the emerging countries multinationals on the efficiencies and profitability.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Farhan Chaudhry

The current study investigates short-term abnormal returns of emerging countries multinationals acquirers on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging and developed countries. For this objective, the current study employs market return model approach and then uses the event study to estimate short-term abnormal returns of the emerging countries acquirers and used daily data for the period of January 01, 2010 to March 31, 2018. Statistical results lead to conclude that shareholders of the emerging countries acquirers earn short-term positive and statistically significant abnormal returns on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging countries. Similarly, results conclude that shareholders of the acquiring firms of the emerging countries earn short-term positive and statistically significant returns on cross-border acquisitions in developed countries. These return patterns of the emerging countries multinational companies (EMNCs) on cross-border acquisitions in developing and developed countries are not like abnormal short-term abnormal return patterns of the developed countries multinational companies (MNCs) on cross-border acquisitions. The current study also concludes that factors such as political stability has inverse, legal framework inverse though insignificant, size of emerging countries acquirers direct, leverage negative, and ownership no impact on short-term abnormal returns of EMNCs proxied by CAR (-1, 1) on cross-border acquisitions in other emerging countries. Moreover, concludes that factors such as political stability, legal framework, and size of emerging countries acquirers have inverse, leverage direct, ownership has no effect on short-term abnormal returns of EMNCs proxied by CAR (-1, 1) on cross-border acquisitions in developed countries. The implications of the current study are of great importance both for the acquirers and investors of the emerging countries. Therefore, investors can insight short-term abnormal return patterns on the announcement of cross-border acquisitions by the EMNCs in other emerging and developed countries. Further, implications of the current study can help to anticipate response of the market participants on the news of cross-border acquisitions by the EMNCs in developing and developed countries. Henceforth, keeping in view the short- term positive abnormal pattern of the acquirers of the emerging countries multinationals on cross-border acquisitions, smart investment decisions can be made to achieve synergies, efficiencies, access on skilled labor, access on low cost capital, higher sales, and access on technology that will ultimately increase the wealth of the shareholders. Limitations of the current study are to cross-border acquisitions of the emerging countries multinationals in developing and developed countries, but more research work can be undertaken to investigate the impact of industry-wise cross-border acquisitions. Also, current study is limited to examine the cross-border acquisitions of the emerging countries multinationals of the public companies in other developing and developed countries, however more empirical research can be undertaken to examine the effects of cross-border acquisitions in private sectors. More empirical research can be undertaken by adding the impact of cross-border mergers by the emerging countries multinationals on short-term abnormal returns in developing and developed countries. Similarly, research work can be undertaken to examine the long run impact of the cross-border mergers and acquisitions by the emerging countries multinationals on the efficiencies and profitability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrijn Gielens ◽  
Inge Geyskens ◽  
Barbara Deleersnyder ◽  
Max Nohe

Suppliers are increasingly being forced by dominant retailers to clean up their supply chains. These retailers argue that their sustainability mandates may translate into profits for suppliers, but many suppliers are cynical about these mandates because the onus to undertake the required investments is on them while potential gains may be usurped by the mandating retailer. We examine whether supplier fears are justified by studying the impact of Walmart's sustainability mandate on its suppliers’ (short-term) shareholder value. Although about two-thirds of suppliers are indeed financially harmed, approximately one-third benefit. To delve deeper into this variation, we relate suppliers’ short-term abnormal returns to Walmart's appropriation power and explore whether and to what extent a supplier's referent and expert power sources, derived from its marketing and operational characteristics, respectively, can counteract Walmart's appropriation attempts. We find that the supplier's marketing characteristics (its environmental reputation, brand equity, and advertising) provide it with the countervailing power needed to resist Walmart's appropriation attempts. In contrast, cost-efficient suppliers and suppliers that invest heavily in R&D have more difficulty withstanding Walmart's squeeze attempts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-246
Author(s):  
Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov ◽  
Vinko Lepojević ◽  
Jovana Stojanović

Bearing in mind the different nature and the impact of various types of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the one hand, and the specific macroeconomic environment in the post-socialist countries on the other hand, in this paper we reexamine the selected macroeconomic factors that affect the two types of FDI inflows (cross-border mergers and acquisitions and greenfield FDI) in four countries of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The study employs the balanced panel data framework and covers twelve-year period (2006-2017). Having performed the Hausman test, we use the random effect model and provide evidence that: (1) the key FDI macroeconomic determinants in stable business conditions, examined in numerous research studies, can have a different impact on FDI in times characterized by unstability and financial crisis, (2) some determinants of FDI inflows have different importance and direction in the case of cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI. Our findings are relevant for policymakers who should reconsider the key factors that fuel the FDI inflows towards their developing economies.


Author(s):  
Federico Carril-Caccia ◽  
Juliette Milgran Baleix

This study contributes to the literature seeking to test the pollution haven’s hypothesis (PHH), by focusing on the influence of environmental policy on the location’s decision of cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As). To this end, we estimate a gravity model using an original bilateral database for the extensive margin of M&A among 34 developed and emerging countries during the period 1995-2015. Reached evidence confirms only part of the pessimist predictions. A more stringent environmental regulation would not boost outward M&As to the extent that it originates from countries with relatively good institutional quality. In contrast, in countries with relatively high level of corruption, the laxer the environmental regulation, the higher the number of inward M&As. However, reducing corruption can compensate the competitiveness losses associated with the compliance of a stricter environmental regulation


2022 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Bayo Flees ◽  
Sulaiman Mouselli

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of qualified audit opinions on the returns of stocks listed at Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) after the introduction of the recent amendments by the International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB) on audits reporting and conclusions. It further investigates if results differ between first time qualified and sequenced qualifications, and between plain qualified opinion and qualifications with going concern. Design/methodology/approach Audit opinions’ announcements and stock returns data are collected from companies’ annual reports for the fiscal years 2016 to 2019 while stock returns are computed from stock closing prices published at ASE website. The authors apply the event study approach and use the market model to calculate normal returns. Cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) and average abnormal returns (AARs) are computed for all qualified audit opinions’ announcements. Findings The empirical evidence suggests that investors at ASE do not react to qualified audit opinions announcements. That is, the authors find an insignificant impact of qualified audit opinion announcements on stock returns using both CAR and AAR estimates. The results are robust to first time and sequenced qualifications, and for qualifications with going concern. Results are also robust to the use of risk adjusted market model. Research limitations/implications The insignificant impact of qualified audit opinions on stock returns have two potential conflicting research implications. First, the new amendments introduced to auditors’ report made them more informative and reduce the negative signals contained in the qualified opinions. That is, investors are now aware of the real causes of qualifications and not overreacting to the qualified opinion. Second, the documented insignificant impact confirms that ASE is not a semi-strong form efficient. Practical implications The apparent excessive use of qualifications should ring the bell on whether auditors misuse their power or companies are really in trouble. Hence, the Jordanian regulatory bodies need to warn auditors against the excessive use of qualifications on the one hand, and to raise the awareness of investors on the implications of auditors’ opinions on the other hand. Originality/value This study is innovative in twofold. First, it explores the impact of qualified audit opinions on stock returns after the introduction of new amendments by IAASB at ASE. In addition, it uses event study approach and distinguishes between first time qualified and sequenced qualifications, and between plain qualified opinion and qualifications with going concern. The results are consistent with efficient market theory and behavioral finance explanations.


Author(s):  
Wee Chian Koh ◽  
Shu Yu

Emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs) weathered the 2009 global recession relatively well. However, the impact of the global recession varied across economies. EMDEs with stronger pre-crisis fundamentals — such as large foreign exchange reserves, sound fiscal positions, and low inflation — suffered milder growth slowdowns, in part due to their greater capacity to engage in monetary and fiscal stimulus. Low-income countries were also resilient, as foreign aid and inflows of remittances remained relatively stable. In contrast, EMDEs that were heavily dependent on short-term capital flows — such as portfolio investment and cross-border bank lending — fared less well, especially those in Europe and Central Asia. A key lesson for EMDEs is the need to strengthen macroeconomic frameworks and create policy space to prepare for future global downturns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document