USAGE OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR FOR SAND-GRAVEL AND SAND DEPOSIT PROSPECTING, KRIZOVKA CASE STUDY, EASTERN LATVIA

Author(s):  
Davids Berzins
Plant Methods ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Delgado ◽  
Dirk B. Hays ◽  
Richard K. Bruton ◽  
Hernán Ceballos ◽  
Alexandre Novo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-459
Author(s):  
Nectaria Diamanti ◽  
A. Peter Annan

We provide a coherent approach for developing an understanding of how and where ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can be deployed for tunnel detection. While tunnels in general are of interest, the more specific focus is tunnels that are hand dug or created with a minimal amount of equipment and resources for clandestine purposes. Determining whether GPR can be used for tunnel detection is impossible without an in-depth knowledge of the operational environment and constraints. To effectively address the question, we define the general characteristics of clandestine tunnels, discuss how to estimate the responses amplitude, define the dominant noise types associated with GPR data, and point out how those factors are affected by the GPR system. The key aspects are illustrated using a controlled field case study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (236) ◽  
pp. 1008-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. LAPAZARAN ◽  
J. OTERO ◽  
A. MARTÍN-ESPAÑOL ◽  
F.J. NAVARRO

ABSTRACTThis is the first (Paper I) of three companion papers focused respectively, on the estimates of the errors in ice thickness retrieved from pulsed ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data, on how to estimate the errors at the grid points of an ice-thickness DEM, and on how the latter errors, plus the boundary delineation errors, affect the ice-volume estimates. We here present a comprehensive analysis of the various errors involved in the computation of ice thickness from pulsed GPR data, assuming they have been properly migrated. We split the ice-thickness error into independent components that can be estimated separately. We consider, among others, the effects of the errors in radio-wave velocity and timing. A novel aspect is the estimate of the error in thickness due to the uncertainty in horizontal positioning of the GPR measurements, based on the local thickness gradient. Another novel contribution is the estimate of the horizontal positioning error of the GPR measurements due to the velocity of the GPR system while profiling, and the periods of GPS refreshing and GPR triggering. Their effects are particularly important for airborne profiling. We illustrate our methodology through a case study of Werenskioldbreen, Svalbard.


Geomorphology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 367 ◽  
pp. 107311
Author(s):  
Lucía Bermejo ◽  
Ana Isabel Ortega ◽  
Josep M. Parés ◽  
Isidoro Campaña ◽  
José María Bermúdez de Castro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document