scholarly journals Systemic treatments for advanced cutaneous melanoma — Cochrane Systematic Review 2018

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 241-248
Author(s):  
Joanna Połowinczak-Przybyłek ◽  
Piotr Potemski
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-44

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Pasquali S, Hadjinicolaou AV, Chiarion Sileni V, Rossi CR, Mocellin S. Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD011123. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e040751
Author(s):  
Zachary Blood ◽  
Anh Tran ◽  
Lauren Caleo ◽  
Robyn Saw ◽  
Mbathio Dieng ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in clinical quality registries, for people with cutaneous melanoma, to inform a new Australian Melanoma Clinical Outcomes Registry; and describe opportunities and challenges of routine PROM/PREM collection, especially in primary care.DesignSystematic review.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWhich PROMs and PREMs are used in clinical quality registries for people with cutaneous melanoma, how they are collected, frequency of collection, participant recruitment methods and funding models for each registry.Results1134 studies were identified from MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects databases and TUFTS Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, alongside grey literature, from database inception to 5th February 2020. Following screening, 14 studies were included, identifying four relevant registries: Dutch Melanoma Registry, Adelphi Real-World Disease-Specific Programme (Melanoma), Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship Registry, and Cancer Experience Registry. These used seven PROMs: EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Functional Assessment of Cancer-General (FACT-G) and FACT-Melanoma (FACT-M), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Fatigue Assessment Scale Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Information System-29 and one PREM; EORTC QLQ-Information Module 26. PROMs/PREMs in registries were reported to improve transparency of care; facilitate clinical auditing for quality assessment; enable cost-effectiveness analyses and create large-scale research platforms. Challenges included resource burden for data entry and potential collection bias toward younger, more affluent respondents. Feedback from patients with melanoma highlighted the relevance of PROMs/PREMs in assessing patient outcomes and patient experiences.ConclusionsClinical registries indicate PROMs/PREMs for melanoma care can be incorporated and address important gaps, however cost and collection bias may limit generalisability.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018086737.


2020 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 103044 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bisschop ◽  
E.C. de Heer ◽  
A.H. Brouwers ◽  
G.A.P. Hospers ◽  
M. Jalving

BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (jul24 2) ◽  
pp. e4757-e4757 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Boniol ◽  
P. Autier ◽  
P. Boyle ◽  
S. Gandini

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (18) ◽  
pp. 2492-2505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupsa C. Boelig ◽  
Samantha J. Barton ◽  
Gabriele Saccone ◽  
Anthony J. Kelly ◽  
Steven J. Edwards ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 706-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Davies ◽  
Tiffany Moxham ◽  
Karen Rees ◽  
Sally Singh ◽  
Andrew J.S. Coats ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document