scholarly journals Recent Development in Duty of Cost Minimisation in Legal Expenses Insurance in Germany

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (651) ◽  
pp. 651_51-651_80
Author(s):  
Masaki Omoto
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
B Del Rosario García ◽  
F Gutiérrez Nicolás ◽  
JA Morales Barrios ◽  
MM Viña Romero ◽  
E Ramos Santana ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Obioma R. Nwaogbe ◽  
Victor Omoke ◽  
Emmanuel C. Ubani ◽  
Sunday I. Ukaegbu

The objective of this study was to determine the optimal allocation of shipments (least cost) of two manufactured products between depots and places of consumption. In this study, the least-cost method was used in solving the transportation algorithm using Tora 2.0 version software. The study was necessary because of the high operating costs associated with physical distribution when deliveries are not properly planned and considered with reference to alternative strategies. In contrast, significant savings can be achieved by using techniques available for determining the cheapest methods of transporting goods from several origins to several destinations. Cost minimisation is a very useful approach to the solution of transportation problems.


2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 1546-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Teljeur ◽  
M O'Neill ◽  
PS Moran ◽  
P Harrington ◽  
M Flattery ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-100
Author(s):  
Klara Fischer ◽  
Sebastian Hess

Swedish farmers were surveyed about their perceptions of genetically modified (GM) feed. Livestock in the EU are frequently given feed containing imported genetically modified (GM) crops, with GM fodder often being cheaper for farmers. However, there is also a growing market for ‘GM-free’ animal-based products. While public concerns about GMOs have been studied extensively, less is known about farmers’ views. The limited literature on farmers and GMOs tends to focus on the economic factors influencing their adoption. The present study contributes the perspective of farmers as members of the general public, thus including a broader set of factors known to be relevant for the public perception of GMOs. The results indicated that farmers were worried about: i) unforeseen consequences for the environment, ii) un­foreseen consequences for human and animal health, and iii) the dominance of multinational companies. Farmers who could expect their farm businesses to benefit from existing GMOs were more positive, whereas those who were unlikely to experience any benefits or who could expect their farm business to be adversely affected were more negative. Nevertheless, adherence to a broader set of positive or negative values suggests that Swedish farmers’ perspectives on GMOs go further than pure considerations of farm management.


Author(s):  
J Ramos Rodríguez ◽  
S García Gil ◽  
L Cantarelli ◽  
J González García ◽  
C Romero Delgado ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document