Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria monocytogenes Assay

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Carlos Leon-Velarde ◽  
Nathan Larson ◽  
Keron Dave ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Ice Cream ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Food Contact Surfaces ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
Reliable Performance

Abstract The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™Listeria monocytogenes Assay is a new real-time PCR assay for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food and environmental samples. This assay was validated using the AOAC Research Institute (AOAC-RI) Performance Tested MethodsSM program in comparison to the reference method detailed in International Organization for Standardization 11290-1:1996, including Amendment 1:2004 with the following foods and food contact surfaces: smoked salmon, processed cheese, fresh bagged spinach, fresh cantaloupe, cooked prawns (chilled product), cooked sliced turkey meat (chilled product), ice cream, pork frankfurters, salami, ground raw beef meat (12% fat), plastic, and stainless steel. All matrixes were tested by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Microbiology Division, Basingstoke, UK. In addition, three matrixes (pork frankfurters, bagged lettuce, and stainless steel) were analyzed independently as part of the AOAC-RI controlled laboratorystudy by the University of Guelph, Canada. Using probability of detection (POD) statistical analysis, a significant difference was demonstrated between the candidate and reference methods for salami, cooked sliced turkey and ice cream in favor of the SureTect assay. For all other matrixes, no significant difference by POD was seen between the two methods during the study. Inclusivity and exclusivity testing was also conducted with 53 and30 isolates, respectively, which demonstrated that the SureTect assay was able to detect all serotypes of L. monocytogenes. None of the exclusivity isolates analyzed were detectedby the SureTect assay. Ruggedness testing was conducted to evaluate the performance of the assay with specific method deviations outside the recommended parameters open to variation, i.e., enrichment time and temperature and lysis temperature, which demonstrated that the assay gave reliable performance. Accelerated stability testing was alsoconducted, validating the assay shelf life.

Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria species Assay

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
Annette Hughes ◽  
Helen Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Stainless Steel Surface ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Smoked Salmon ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
High Level

Abstract The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria species Assay is a new real-time PCR assay for the detection of all species of Listeria in food and environmental samples. This validation study was conducted using the AOAC Research Institute (RI) Performance Tested MethodsSM program to validate the SureTect Listeria species Assay in comparison to the reference method detailed in International Organization for Standardization 11290-1:1996 including amendment 1:2004 in a variety of foods plus plastic and stainlesssteel. The food matrixes validated were smoked salmon, processed cheese, fresh bagged spinach, cantaloupe, cooked prawns, cooked sliced turkey meat, cooked sliced ham, salami, pork frankfurters, and raw ground beef. All matrixes were tested by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Microbiology Division, Basingstoke, UK. Inaddition, three matrixes (pork frankfurters, fresh bagged spinach, and stainless steel surface samples) were analyzed independently as part of the AOAC-RI-controlled independent laboratory study by the University of Guelph, Canada. Using probability of detection statistical analysis, a significant difference infavour of the SureTect assay was demonstrated between the SureTect and reference method for high level spiked samples of pork frankfurters, smoked salmon, cooked prawns, stainless steel, and low-spiked samples of salami. For all other matrixes, no significant difference was seen between the two methods during the study. Inclusivity testing was conducted with 68 different isolates of Listeria species, all of which were detected by the SureTect Listeria species Assay. None of the 33 exclusivity isolates were detected by the SureTect Listeria species Assay. Ruggedness testing was conducted to evaluate the performance of the assay with specific method deviations outside of the recommended parameters open to variation, which demonstrated that the assay gave reliable performance. Accelerated stability testing was additionally conducted, validating the assay shelf life.

Method Modification of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Listeria monocytogenes Assay for Raw Meat, Dairy, Produce, and Seafood

2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1315-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
Annette Hughes ◽  
Helen Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ground Pork ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
Pork Sausages ◽  
The University ◽  
Fisher Scientific

Abstract The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria monocytogenes assay is a real-time PCR assay for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food and environmental samples, which was certified during 2013 by the AOAC Research Institute (RI) as Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) 061302 for a representative range of key food matrixes and production surfaces. This report details the method modification study, which was conducted during 2014, using the AOAC-RI PTM program to extend the validated matrix claims of the assay in comparison to the reference method detailed in International Organization for Standardization 11290-1:1996, including Amendment 1:2004, to gain certification for raw ground turkey, raw ground pork, pasteurized 2% milk, raw pork sausages, raw cod, pasteurized brie cheese, cooked sliced ham, and bagged lettuce. All matrixes were tested by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Microbiology Division, Basingstoke, UK. In addition, brie cheese, bagged lettuce, and raw cod were analyzed independently by the University of Guelph, Canada, during the AOAC-RI controlled independent laboratory study. Using probability of detection (POD) statistical analysis, a significant difference was demonstrated between the candidate and reference methods for the high spiking level with raw ground pork and brie cheese. For all other matrixes and the low spiked levels for raw ground pork and brie cheese, no significant difference by POD was seen between the two methods during the study.

Comparative Evaluation of Veriflow®Listeria Species to USDA Culture-Based Method for the Detection of Listeria spp. in Food and Environmental Samples

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1434-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C Joelsson ◽  
Shawn P Terkhorn ◽  
Ashley S Brown ◽  
Amrita Puri ◽  
Benjamin J Pascal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Ceramic Tile ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Veriflow®Listeria species (Veriflow LS) is a molecular-based assay for the presumptive detection of Listeria spp. from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile) and ready-to-eat (RTE) food matrixes (hot dogs and deli meat). The assay utilizes a PCRdetection method coupled with a rapid, visual, flow-based assay that develops in 3 min post-PCR amplification and requires only a 24 h enrichment for maximum sensitivity. The Veriflow LS system eliminates the need for sample purification, gel electrophoresis, or fluorophore-based detection of target amplification and does not require complex data analysis. This Performance Tested MethodSM validation study demonstrated the ability of the Veriflow LS assayto detect low levels of artificially inoculated Listeria spp. in six distinct environmental and food matrixes. In each unpaired reference comparison study, probability of detection analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the Veriflow LS method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guide Chapter 8.08 reference method. Fifty-one strains of various Listeria spp. were detected in the inclusivity study, and 35 nonspecific organisms went undetected in the exclusivity study. The study results show that the Veriflow LS is a sensitive, selective, and robust assay for the presumptive detection of Listeria spp. sampled from environmental surfaces (stainless steel, sealed concrete, plastic, and ceramic tile) and RTE food matrixes (hot dogs and delimeat).

InstantLabs®Listeria monocytogenes Food Safety Kit

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 852-861
Author(s):  
Neil Sharma ◽  
Lauren Bambusch ◽  
Thu Le ◽  
Amit Morey
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Food Safety ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Cheddar Cheese ◽  
Ice Cream ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Whole Milk ◽  
Raw Shrimp

Abstract The InstantLabs®Listeria monocytogenes Food Safety Kit was validated against the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) reference method 11290-1 for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria species. The matrixes (stainless steel, sealed concrete, ice cream, whole milk, cheddar cheese, raw shrimp, hot dogs, deli turkey, and lettuce) were inoculated with approximately 1 CFU/test portion of L. monocytogenes to generate fractional positives (5–15) in 20 inoculated samples. Enrichments were also fractionally inoculated with L. grayii for side-by-side testing of the Listeria Species Food Safety Kit. Stainless steel and sealed concrete samples were validated using 4 × 4″ and 1 × 1″ test areas, respectively, and enriched in Buffered Listeria Enrichment Broth (BLEB) at 35 ± 1°C for 22–28 h. All food samples were tested at 25 g and enriched in BLEB at 35 ± 1°C for 24–28 h. All samples were confirmed using the ISO reference method, regardless of initial screen result. The InstantLabs test method performed as well as or better than the reference method for the detection of L. monocytogenes on stainless steel and sealed concrete and in ice cream, whole milk, cheddar cheese, raw shrimp, hot dogs, deli turkey, and lettuce. Inclusivity and exclusivity testing revealed no false negatives and no false positives among the 50 L. monocytogenes serovars and 30 non-L. monocytogenes species examined. The method was shown to be robust when the enrichment times, volumes for DNA extraction, and heat block times were varied.

Comparative Evaluation of Veriflow®Listeria monocytogenes to USDA and AOAC Culture Based Methods for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Food

2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1325-1334
Author(s):  
Adam C Joelsson ◽  
Ashley S Brown ◽  
Amrita Puri ◽  
Martin P Keough ◽  
Zara E Gaudioso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inspection Service

Abstract Veriflow®Listeria monocytogenes (LM) is a molecular based assay for the presumptive detection of Listeria monocytogenes from environmental surfaces, dairy, and ready-to-eat (RTE) food matrixes (hot dogs and deli meat). The assay utilizes a PCR detection method coupled with a rapid, visual, flow-based assay that develops in 3 min post PCR amplification and requires only 24 h of enrichment for maximum sensitivity. The Veriflow LM system eliminates the need for sample purification, gel electrophoresis, or fluorophore-based detection of target amplification, and does not require complex data analysis. This Performance Tested MethodSM validation study demonstrated the ability of the Veriflow LM method to detect low levels of artificially inoculated L. monocytogenes in seven distinct environmental and food matrixes. In each unpaired reference comparison study, probability of detection analysis indicated no significant difference between the Veriflow LM method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 8.08 or AOAC 993.12 reference method. Fifty strains of L. monocytogenes were detected in the inclusivity study, while 39 nonspecific organisms were undetected in the exclusivity study. The study results show that Veriflow LM is a sensitive, selective, and robust assay for the presumptive detection of L. monocytogenes sampled from environmental, dairy, or RTE (hot dogs and deli meat) food matrixes.

Validation of the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Instrument for Detection of Listeria monocytogenes with the SureTect Listeria monocytogenes PCR Assay

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-685
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Julia Arizanova ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
Helen Simpson ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
International Organization ◽  
Stainless Steel Surface ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Surface Samples ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 2

Abstract In 2013, the Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria monocytogenes Real-Time PCR Assay was certified by the AOAC Research Institute (RI) Performance Tested MethodsSM program as a rapid method for the detection of L. monocytogenes from a wide range of food matrixes and surface samples. This report details the method modification studies undertaken to extend the analysis of this PCR assay to the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast PCR Instrument and Applied Biosystems RapidFinder™ Express 2.0 software allowing the use of the SureTect assay on a 96 well format PCR cycler in addition to the current workflow, which uses the 24 well Thermo Scientific PikoReal™ PCR Instrument and Thermo Scientific SureTect software. Because this study was deemed by AOAC-RI to be a level 2 method modification study, a representative range of food matrixes covering raw ground turkey, 2% fat pasteurized milk, and bagged lettuce as well as stainless steel surface samples were analyzed with the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast PCR Instrument and RapidFinder Express 2.0 software. All testing was conducted in comparison to the reference method detailed in International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 6579:2002. No significant difference by probability of detection statistical analysis was found between the SureTect Listeria monocytogenes PCR Assay or the ISO reference method methods for any of the matrixes analyzed during the study.

Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species Assay

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-560
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Dorn Clark, Jr ◽  
Roy Radcliff ◽  
Carlos Leon-Velarde ◽  
Nathan Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Chicken Breast ◽  
Stainless Steel Surface ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Surface Samples ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Liquid Whole Egg ◽  
Whole Egg

Abstract The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species Assay is a new real-time PCR assay for the detection of Salmonellae in food and environmental samples. This validation study was conducted using the AOAC Research Institute (RI) Performance Tested MethodsSM program to validate the SureTect Salmonella species Assay incomparison to the reference method detailed in International Organization for Standardization 6579:2002 in a variety of food matrixes, namely, raw ground beef, raw chicken breast, raw ground pork, fresh bagged lettuce, pork frankfurters, nonfat dried milk powder, cooked peeled shrimp, pasteurized liquid whole egg, ready-to-eat meal containing beef, and stainlesssteel surface samples. With the exception of liquid whole egg and fresh bagged lettuce, which were tested in-house, all matrixes were tested by Marshfield Food Safety, Marshfield, WI, on behalf of Thermo Fisher Scientific. In addition, three matrixes (pork frankfurters, lettuce, and stainless steel surface samples) were analyzed independently as part of the AOAC-RI-controlled laboratory study by the University of Guelph, Canada. No significant difference by probability of detection or McNemars Chi-squared statistical analysis was found between the candidate or reference methods for any of the food matrixes or environmental surface samples tested during the validation study. Inclusivity and exclusivity testing was conducted with 117 and 36 isolates, respectively, which demonstrated that the SureTect Salmonella species Assay was able to detect all the major groups of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica (e.g., Typhimurium) and the less common subspecies of S. enterica (e.g., arizoniae) and the rarely encountered S. bongori. None of the exclusivity isolates analyzed were detected by the SureTect Salmonella species Assay. Ruggedness testing was conducted to evaluate the performance of the assay with specific method deviations outside of the recommended parameters open to variation (enrichment time and temperature, and lysis temperature), which demonstrated that the assay gave reliable performance. Accelerated stability testing was additionally conducted, validating the assay shelf life.

Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific RapidFinder™ Salmonella Species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 1059-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Scopes ◽  
Jessica Screen ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
Annette Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiplex Pcr ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Salmonella Spp ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
Reliable Performance ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The Thermo Scientific RapidFinder™ Salmonella Species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit (candidate method) is a real-time PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella spp., and the serovars S. Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis from poultry, pork, and environmental samples. The method was validated in comparison to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reference methods. Thermo Fisher Scientific (Basingstoke, United Kingdom) tested all matrixes. In addition, two matrixes were analyzed independently by Q Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH). Few statistically significant differences were found between the candidate and reference methods when analyzed by probability of detection. When differences were observed, these were in favor of the candidate method. All 200 inclusivity strains and none of the 45 exclusivity strains were detected, which demonstrated that the RapidFinder Salmonella Species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis Multiplex PCR Kit was able to detect all the major groups of Salmonella, the less common subspecies of S. enterica, and the rarely encountered S. bongori. None of the exclusivity isolates analyzed were detected. Robustness testing demonstrated that the assay gave reliable performance, with specific method deviations outside the recommended parameters. Accelerated stability testing was conducted, validating the assay shelf life.

Method Modification Study for the Thermo Scientific SureTect™ Listeria Species Assay–Matrix Extension

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-427
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cloke ◽  
Katharine Evans ◽  
David Crabtree ◽  
Annette Hughes ◽  
Helen Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Listeria Species ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thermo Fisher Scientific ◽  
Pork Sausages ◽  
The University ◽  
Matrix Extension ◽  
Fisher Scientific

Abstract The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Listeria species assay is a new real-time PCR assay for the detection of all species of Listeria in food and environmental samples. The assay was originally certified as Performance Tested MethodsSM (PTM) 071304 in 2013. This report details the method modification study undertaken to extend the performance claims of the assay for matrixes of raw ground turkey, raw ground pork, bagged lettuce, raw pork sausages, pasteurized 2% fat milk, raw cod, pasteurized brie cheese, and ice cream. The method modification study was conducted using the AOAC Research Institute (RI) PTM program to validate the SureTect PCR assay in comparison to the reference method detailed in ISO 11290-1:1996 including amendment 1:2004. All matrixes were tested by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Basingstoke, United Kingdom). In addition, three matrixes (raw cod, bagged lettuce, and pasteurized brie cheese) were analyzed independently as part of the AOAC RI-controlled independent laboratory study by the University of Guelph, Canada. Using probability of detection statistical analysis, there was no significant difference in the performance between the SureTect assay and the International Organization for Standardization reference method for any of the matrixes analyzed in this study.

scholarly journals Ultrasonic Cleaning of Conveyor Belt Materials Using Listeria monocytogenes as a Model Organism

2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 758-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
RIINA TOLVANEN ◽  
JANNE LUNDÉN ◽  
HANNU KORKEALA ◽  
GUN WIRTANEN
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Model Organism ◽  
Conveyor Belt ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Cleaning Efficiency ◽  
Ultrasonic Cleaning ◽  
Plastic Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Logarithmic Reduction

Persistent Listeria monocytogenes contamination of food industry equipment is a difficult problem to solve. Ultrasonic cleaning offers new possibilities for cleaning conveyors and other equipment that are not easy to clean. Ultrasonic cleaning was tested on three conveyor belt materials: polypropylene, acetal, and stainless steel (cold-rolled, AISI 304). Cleaning efficiency was tested at two temperatures (30 and 45°C) and two cleaning times (30 and 60 s) with two cleaning detergents (KOH, and NaOH combined with KOH). Conveyor belt materials were soiled with milk-based soil and L. monocytogenes strains V1, V3, and B9, and then incubated for 72 h to attach bacteria to surfaces. Ultrasonic cleaning treatments reduced L. monocytogenes counts on stainless steel 4.61 to 5.90 log units; on acetal, 3.37 to 5.55 log units; and on polypropylene, 2.31 to 4.40 log units. The logarithmic reduction differences were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. The logarithmic reduction was significantly greater in stainless steel than in plastic materials (P < 0.001 for polypropylene, P = 0.023 for acetal). Higher temperatures enhanced the cleaning efficiency in tested materials. No significant difference occurred between cleaning times. The logarithmic reduction was significantly higher (P = 0.013) in cleaning treatments with potassium hydroxide detergent. In this study, ultrasonic cleaning was efficient for cleaning conveyor belt materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document