scholarly journals Simulation of Cross Flow Heat Exchanger for Multi Tubes Using FLUENT 6.3.26

Author(s):  
Suneela Sardar ◽  
Shahid Raza Malik
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Diani ◽  
Luisa Rossetto ◽  
Roberto Dall’Olio ◽  
Daniele De Zen ◽  
Filippo Masetto

Cross flow heat exchangers, when applied to cool data center rooms, use external air (process air) to cool the air stream coming from the data center room (primary air). However, an air–air heat exchanger is not enough to cope with extreme high heat loads in critical conditions (high external temperature). Therefore, water can be sprayed in the process air to increase the heat dissipation capability (wet mode). Water evaporates, and the heat flow rate is transferred to the process air as sensible and latent heat. This paper proposes an analytical approach to predict the behavior of a cross flow heat exchanger in wet mode. The theoretical results are then compared to experimental tests carried out on a real machine in wet mode conditions. Comparisons are given in terms of calculated versus experimental heat flow rate and evaporated water mass flow rate, showing a good match between theoretical and experimental values.


1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. E. M. Saboya ◽  
C. E. S. M. da Costa

From the second law of thermodynamics, the concepts of irreversibility, entropy generation, and availability are applied to counterflow, parallel-flow, and cross-flow heat exchangers. In the case of the Cross-flow configuration, there are four types of heat exchangers: I) both fluids unmixed, 2) both fluids mixed, 3) fluid of maximum heat capacity rate mixed and the other unmixed, 4) fluid of minimum heat capacity rate mixed and the other unmixed. In the analysis, the heat exchangers are assumed to have a negligible pressure drop irreversibility. The Counterflow heat exchanger is compared with the other five heat exchanger types and the comparison will indicate which one has the minimum irreversibility rate. In this comparison, only the exit temperatures and the heat transfer rates of the heat exchangers are different. The other conditions (inlet temperatures, mass flow rates, number of transfer units) and the working fluids are the same in the heat exchangers.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Delnero ◽  
Dave Dreisigmeyer ◽  
Douglas Hittle ◽  
Peter Young ◽  
Charles Anderson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 01023
Author(s):  
T.M. Yusof ◽  
M.F. Basrawi ◽  
A. Shahrani ◽  
H. Ibrahim

Ground heat exchanger is an exciting technique to reduce energy consumption in building especially in hot climate countries. Implementation of GHE for commercial unit in Malaysia is almost none in record. Thus, performance study of the GHE in Malaysia is crucial to be conducted either experimentally or numerically. Therefore, this paper presents the performance of GHE in term of effectiveness, outlet temperature and rate of heat transfer based on mathematical model. The model is developed based on cross flow heat exchanger with one fluid unmixed. There are two variable parameter used in the analysis which is effectiveness and flowrate of the air for 25 meter length of a PVC pipe. Three effectiveness values which is 0.8, 0.9 and 0.99 have been analysed in this study. Meanwhile, flowrate of air is ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 kg/s. Results show that flowrate at 0.02 kg/s gives great temperature reduction in the pipe compared with higher flowrate. However, flowrate of 0.2 kg/s produces higher cooling potential. Characteristic of the GHE for the rate of heat transfer with 80, 90 and 99 percent effectiveness also have been developed and it has been found that effectiveness of 0.9 provide good combination between flowrate and the rate of heat transfer for 25 meter length of the pipe


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document