Shang, Hong, and Erik Trinkaus: The Early Modern Human from Tianyuan Cave, China

Anthropos ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 709-710
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Bae
Keyword(s):  
Nature ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 548 (7667) ◽  
pp. 322-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Westaway ◽  
J. Louys ◽  
R. Due Awe ◽  
M. J. Morwood ◽  
G. J. Price ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Rabett ◽  
Philip J. Piper

For many decades Palaeolithic research viewed the development of early modern human behaviour as largely one of progress down a path towards the ‘modernity’ of the present. The European Palaeolithic sequence — the most extensively studied — was for a long time the yard-stick against which records from other regions were judged. Recent work undertaken in Africa and increasingly Asia, however, now suggests that the European evidence may tell a story that is more parochial and less universal than previously thought. While tracking developments at the large scale (the grand narrative) remains important, there is growing appreciation that to achieve a comprehensive understanding of human behavioural evolution requires an archaeologically regional perspective to balance this.One of the apparent markers of human modernity that has been sought in the global Palaeolithic record, prompted by finds in the European sequence, is innovation in bonebased technologies. As one step in the process of re-evaluating and contextualizing such innovations, in this article we explore the role of prehistoric bone technologies within the Southeast Asian sequence, where they have at least comparable antiquity to Europe and other parts of Asia. We observe a shift in the technological usage of bone — from a minor component to a medium of choice — during the second half of the Last Termination and into the Holocene. We suggest that this is consistent with it becoming a focus of the kinds of inventive behaviour demanded of foraging communities as they adapted to the far-reaching environmental and demographic changes that were reshaping this region at that time. This record represents one small element of a much wider, much longerterm adaptive process, which we would argue is not confined to the earliest instances of a particular technology or behaviour, but which forms part of an on-going story of our behavioural evolution.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanuel Beyin

Although there is a general consensus on African origin of early modern humans, there is disagreement about how and when they dispersed to Eurasia. This paper reviews genetic and Middle Stone Age/Middle Paleolithic archaeological literature from northeast Africa, Arabia, and the Levant to assess the timing and geographic backgrounds of Upper Pleistocene human colonization of Eurasia. At the center of the discussion lies the question of whether eastern Africa alone was the source of Upper Pleistocene human dispersals into Eurasia or were there other loci of human expansions outside of Africa? The reviewed literature hints at two modes of early modern human colonization of Eurasia in the Upper Pleistocene: (i) from multiple Homo sapiens source populations that had entered Arabia, South Asia, and the Levant prior to and soon after the onset of the Last Interglacial (MIS-5), (ii) from a rapid dispersal out of East Africa via the Southern Route (across the Red Sea basin), dating to ~74–60 kya.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (15) ◽  
pp. 1801-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhenYu Zhou ◽  
Ying Guan ◽  
Xing Gao ◽  
ChunXue Wang

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (42) ◽  
pp. 16416-16421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Scholz ◽  
T. C. Johnson ◽  
A. S. Cohen ◽  
J. W. King ◽  
J. A. Peck ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Tassi ◽  
Silvia Ghirotto ◽  
Massimo Mezzavilla ◽  
Sibelle Torres Vilaça ◽  
Lisa De Santi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney B. Reiner ◽  
Fidelis Masao ◽  
Sabrina B. Sholts ◽  
Agustino Venance Songita ◽  
Ian Stanistreet ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Tassi ◽  
Silvia Ghirotto ◽  
Massimo Mezzavilla ◽  
Sibelle Torres Vilaça ◽  
Lisa De Santi ◽  
...  

Background. Anthropological and genetic data agree in indicating the African continent as the main place of origin for modern human. However, it is unclear whether early modern humans left Africa through a single, major process, dispersing simultaneously over Asia and Europe, or in two main waves, first through the Arab peninsula into Southern Asia and Oceania, and later through a Northern route crossing the Levant. Results. Here we show that accurate genomic estimates of the divergence times between European and African populations are more recent than those between Australo-Melanesia and Africa, and incompatible with the effects of a single dispersal. This difference cannot possibly be accounted for by the effects of hybridization with archaic human forms in Australo-Melanesia. Furthermore, in several populations of Asia we found evidence for relatively recent genetic admixture events, which could have obscured the signatures of the earliest processes. Conclusions. We conclude that the hypothesis of a single major human dispersal from Africa appears hardly compatible with the observed historical and geographical patterns of genome diversity, and that Australo-Melanesian populations seem still to retain a genomic signature of a more ancient divergence from Africa


HOMO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dany Coutinho-Nogueira ◽  
Hélène Coqueugniot ◽  
Anne-marie Tillier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document