scholarly journals OH 83: A new early modern human fossil cranium from the Ndutu beds of Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania

2017 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney B. Reiner ◽  
Fidelis Masao ◽  
Sabrina B. Sholts ◽  
Agustino Venance Songita ◽  
Ian Stanistreet ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 519 ◽  
pp. 82-91
Author(s):  
S.-J Park ◽  
J.-Y Kim ◽  
Y.-J Lee ◽  
J.–Y Woo

Nature ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 548 (7667) ◽  
pp. 322-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Westaway ◽  
J. Louys ◽  
R. Due Awe ◽  
M. J. Morwood ◽  
G. J. Price ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Rabett ◽  
Philip J. Piper

For many decades Palaeolithic research viewed the development of early modern human behaviour as largely one of progress down a path towards the ‘modernity’ of the present. The European Palaeolithic sequence — the most extensively studied — was for a long time the yard-stick against which records from other regions were judged. Recent work undertaken in Africa and increasingly Asia, however, now suggests that the European evidence may tell a story that is more parochial and less universal than previously thought. While tracking developments at the large scale (the grand narrative) remains important, there is growing appreciation that to achieve a comprehensive understanding of human behavioural evolution requires an archaeologically regional perspective to balance this.One of the apparent markers of human modernity that has been sought in the global Palaeolithic record, prompted by finds in the European sequence, is innovation in bonebased technologies. As one step in the process of re-evaluating and contextualizing such innovations, in this article we explore the role of prehistoric bone technologies within the Southeast Asian sequence, where they have at least comparable antiquity to Europe and other parts of Asia. We observe a shift in the technological usage of bone — from a minor component to a medium of choice — during the second half of the Last Termination and into the Holocene. We suggest that this is consistent with it becoming a focus of the kinds of inventive behaviour demanded of foraging communities as they adapted to the far-reaching environmental and demographic changes that were reshaping this region at that time. This record represents one small element of a much wider, much longerterm adaptive process, which we would argue is not confined to the earliest instances of a particular technology or behaviour, but which forms part of an on-going story of our behavioural evolution.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanuel Beyin

Although there is a general consensus on African origin of early modern humans, there is disagreement about how and when they dispersed to Eurasia. This paper reviews genetic and Middle Stone Age/Middle Paleolithic archaeological literature from northeast Africa, Arabia, and the Levant to assess the timing and geographic backgrounds of Upper Pleistocene human colonization of Eurasia. At the center of the discussion lies the question of whether eastern Africa alone was the source of Upper Pleistocene human dispersals into Eurasia or were there other loci of human expansions outside of Africa? The reviewed literature hints at two modes of early modern human colonization of Eurasia in the Upper Pleistocene: (i) from multiple Homo sapiens source populations that had entered Arabia, South Asia, and the Levant prior to and soon after the onset of the Last Interglacial (MIS-5), (ii) from a rapid dispersal out of East Africa via the Southern Route (across the Red Sea basin), dating to ~74–60 kya.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (15) ◽  
pp. 1801-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhenYu Zhou ◽  
Ying Guan ◽  
Xing Gao ◽  
ChunXue Wang

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Proctor ◽  
Katerina Douka ◽  
Janet W. Proctor ◽  
Tom Higham

Kent's Cavern is one of Britain's most important Palaeolithic sites. The Torquay Natural History Society excavations in the Vestibule (1926–1928 and 1932–1938) yielded Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic deposits as well as a fragment of human jaw (KC4). Higham et al. (2011) recently identified it as the oldest modern human fossil known from North West Europe, with a date estimated, using Bayesian modelling, at 44,200–41,500 cal bp (at 95.4% probability). However, White and Pettitt (2012) and Zilhão (2013) have claimed that the poor quality of the excavations and lack of stratigraphic integrity cast doubt on the archaeological and dating evidence from the site. Here, we present a thorough re-analysis of the excavations and show that they were in fact conducted to a reasonable standard. We also carefully examine the stratigraphic and sedimentological sequence and present twelve new AMS determinations from key contexts to test the previous model and chronology. We find that, while Trench C has good stratigraphic integrity, there is some evidence of post-depositional disruption of certain parts; some post-depositional movement is also shown by a limited number of artefact refits. There are two outlying AMS determinations dating to c. 32,000 bp. We therefore cannot exclude completely the possibility that the maxilla's age could be younger than the published probability distribution function (PDF). Our analysis lends support to the assessment by Higham et al. (2011) of the site and KC4 and shows that it offers considerable potential for future study.


2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (42) ◽  
pp. 16416-16421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Scholz ◽  
T. C. Johnson ◽  
A. S. Cohen ◽  
J. W. King ◽  
J. A. Peck ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Tassi ◽  
Silvia Ghirotto ◽  
Massimo Mezzavilla ◽  
Sibelle Torres Vilaça ◽  
Lisa De Santi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document