scholarly journals Protein Backbone Torsion Angle-Based Structure Comparison and Secondary Structure Database Web Server

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunghoon Jung ◽  
Se-Eun Bae ◽  
Insung Ahn ◽  
Hyeon S. Son
PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e30361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangning Song ◽  
Hao Tan ◽  
Mingjun Wang ◽  
Geoffrey I. Webb ◽  
Tatsuya Akutsu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seonghoon Jeong

Abstract Backgrounds: Enormous number of possible conformations in the protein structure simulation have led molecular dynamics researchers to be frustrated until now. Some methods with defects ended their experiments into failure. This made them fail to determine the structure and function of folded protein in stable state with the lowest potential energy. This apparently exist in nature. The purpose of resolving a protein folding pathway that follows protein backbone residues torsional inertia was accomplished. Results A new method, torsion angle modeling, was adopted focused on the rotation of dihedral angles. The potential energy was calculated by rotating torsion angles of the peptide with 8 residues. It was found that when moving in the order of torsional inertia, 8 residues swivel in sequence. Six passes were repeated to find the lowest value. Conclusion The protein backbone torsion angle plays very important role in predicting protein structure. Actually it was thousand times faster or more than others to get the obvious pathway.


1992 ◽  
Vol 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Welsh ◽  
Samuel H. Tersigni ◽  
Wangkan Lin

AbstractThe conformational dynamics of a model compound for poly(di-n-hexylsilane) (PDHS) has been explored using the new molecular dynamics program MM3-MD. MM3-MD trajectories at variable temperatures reveal two abrupt conformational transitions, one near -182°C and another near -175°C, associated with two energy barriers on the potential-energy surface. The first transition near -182°C allows shifts in the backbone torsion angle from that defined by the global energy minimum designated off-trans to that corresponding to a statistical collection of torsion angles within the range trans ±30°. The second transition near -175°C allows the backbone torsion angle to explore the remainder of its torsional space. The sidechain dynamics follows a similar pattern. We suggest that the abrupt transition calculated here at -182°C for “gas.phase” PDHS corresponds to that observed for PDHS at -28°C in solution and at 42°C in the solid state.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei-José Petrescu ◽  
Patrick Calmettes ◽  
Dominique Durand ◽  
Veronique Receveur ◽  
Jeremy C. Smith

2004 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 992-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Keskin ◽  
D. Yuret ◽  
A. Gursoy ◽  
M. Turkay ◽  
B. Erman

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 5021-5026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Qinghua Wang ◽  
Jianpeng Ma

Abstract Motivation Predictions of protein backbone torsion angles (ϕ and ψ) and secondary structure from sequence are crucial subproblems in protein structure prediction. With the development of deep learning approaches, their accuracies have been significantly improved. To capture the long-range interactions, most studies integrate bidirectional recurrent neural networks into their models. In this study, we introduce and modify a recently proposed architecture named Transformer to capture the interactions between the two residues theoretically with arbitrary distance. Moreover, we take advantage of multitask learning to improve the generalization of neural network by introducing related tasks into the training process. Similar to many previous studies, OPUS-TASS uses an ensemble of models and achieves better results. Results OPUS-TASS uses the same training and validation sets as SPOT-1D. We compare the performance of OPUS-TASS and SPOT-1D on TEST2016 (1213 proteins) and TEST2018 (250 proteins) proposed in the SPOT-1D paper, CASP12 (55 proteins), CASP13 (32 proteins) and CASP-FM (56 proteins) proposed in the SAINT paper, and a recently released PDB structure collection from CAMEO (93 proteins) named as CAMEO93. On these six test sets, OPUS-TASS achieves consistent improvements in both backbone torsion angles prediction and secondary structure prediction. On CAMEO93, SPOT-1D achieves the mean absolute errors of 16.89 and 23.02 for ϕ and ψ predictions, respectively, and the accuracies for 3- and 8-state secondary structure predictions are 87.72 and 77.15%, respectively. In comparison, OPUS-TASS achieves 16.56 and 22.56 for ϕ and ψ predictions, and 89.06 and 78.87% for 3- and 8-state secondary structure predictions, respectively. In particular, after using our torsion angles refinement method OPUS-Refine as the post-processing procedure for OPUS-TASS, the mean absolute errors for final ϕ and ψ predictions are further decreased to 16.28 and 21.98, respectively. Availability and implementation The training and the inference codes of OPUS-TASS and its data are available at https://github.com/thuxugang/opus_tass. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document