scholarly journals Evaluation of the Effect of Atorvastatin Administration on the Outcomes of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Soltani ◽  
Farahzad Janatmakan ◽  
Sara Jorairahmadi ◽  
Fatemeh Javaherforooshzadeh ◽  
Pooyan Alizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Disability Rating Scale ◽  
Double Blinded

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the common causes of long-term disabilities and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin administration on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) in patients with TBI. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial included 60 patients with TBI in Golestan Hospital of Ahvaz, Iran. After obtaining an informed consent from all patients, the patients were randomly assigned into two groups. For the intervention group, atorvastatin with a daily dose of 20 mg was used. The control group was administered the same amount of placebo for 10 days. Changes in the level of consciousness were measured using the GCS, and functional recovery rate in patients was measured by GOS and DRS in the third follow-up month. Results: According to the obtained results, compared with the control group, the atorvastatin administration significantly increased the level of GCS and DRS within 2 - 3 months post-intervention and improved GOS since the tenth day after the study (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The results revealed the positive effect of atorvastatin on the improvement of outcomes measurements such as GCS, DRS, and GOS in patients after moderate and severe TBI.

Effects of a diuretic adjustment algorithm protocol on heart failure admissions: A randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110096
Author(s):  
Maria KEF Feijó ◽  
Karen Brasil Ruschel ◽  
Daniela Bernardes ◽  
Eduarda B Ferro ◽  
Luis E Rohde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Point Change ◽  
Clinical Instability

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a diuretic adjustment algorithm (DAA) in maintaining clinical stability and reducing HF readmissions using telemonitoring Technologies. Methods Randomized clinical trial of patients with an indication for furosemide dose adjustment during routine outpatient visits. In the intervention group (IG), the diuretic dose was adjusted according to the DAA and the patients received telephone calls for 30 days. In the control group (CG), the diuretic dose was adjusted by a physician at baseline only. Co-primary outcomes were hospital readmission and/or emergency department visits due to decompensated HF within 90 days, and a 2-point change in the Clinical Congestion Score and/or a deterioration in New York Heart Association functional class within 30 days. Results A total of 206 patients were included. Most patients were male ( n=119; 58%), with a mean age of 62 (SD 13) years. Four patients (2%) in the IG and 14 (7%) in the CG were hospitalized for HF (odds ratio (OR) 0.31 (0.10–0.91); p=0.04). Multivariate analysis showed a reduction of 67% in readmissions and/or emergency department visits due to decompensated HF in the IG compared with the CG (95% CI 0.13–0.88; p=0.027). Regarding the combined outcome of HF readmission and/or emergency department visits or clinical instability, the IG had 20% fewer events than the CG within 30 days (IG: n=48 (23%), CG: n=70 (34%); OR 0.80 (0.63–0.93); p=0.03). Discussion Using DAA improved the combined outcome in these outpatients, with favorable and significant results that included a reduction in HF admissions and in clinical instability. (NCT02068937)

Effect of prenatal recommendations of Traditional Persian Medicine on obstetric outcomes: a randomized clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoor Keshavarz ◽  
Maryam Kashanian ◽  
Soodabeh Bioos ◽  
Yasaman Vazani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Obstetric Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Persian Medicine ◽  
Traditional Persian Medicine ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Traditional Persian Medicine (TPM) is an ancient medical system that provides suggestions to improve the health of mothers and children during pregnancy and labor. Persian physicians believed that these instructions made labor easier, safer, and less painful. Methods The present randomized clinical trial was conducted among women at 33–38 weeks of pregnancy in Tehran, Iran. TPM instructions consisted of diet, bathing, and application of oil from the 38th week of pregnancy to the onset of labor. The primary outcome was the duration of the active phase of labor. Results The mean duration of the active phase was 331.60 ± 151.48 min for the intervention group and 344.40 ± 271.46 min for the control groups, but it was not statistically significant. The active phase was significantly shorter in women who had better compliance (p=0.03). The need for oxytocin augmentation was 53.3% in the control group and 38.5% in the intervention group (p=0.17). The rate of perineal infection was 13% in the control group and 0% in the intervention group (p=0.11). Conclusions The active phase was not different in the intervention and control groups, but it was shorter in compliant women. It is possible that prolonged use of these recommendations in combination with a sitz baths and a larger sample size could result in more significant outcomes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Support Surfaces on the Incidence of Pressure Injuries in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Henrique Bueno de Camargo ◽  
Rita de Cassia Pereira ◽  
Marcos T. Tanita ◽  
Lidiane Heko ◽  
Isadora C Grion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Support Surface ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Support Surfaces ◽  
Effect Of Support

Purpose. To analyze whether a viscoelastic mattress support surface can reduce the incidence of stage 2 pressure injuries compared to a standard hospital mattress with pyramidal overlay in critically ill patients. Method. A randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis was carried out recruiting patients with Braden scale ≤14 on intensive care unit admission from April 2016 to April 2017. Patients were allocated into two groups: intervention group (viscoelastic mattress) and control group (standard mattress with pyramidal overlay). The level of significance adopted was 5%. Results. A total of 62 patients were included in the study. There was a predominance of males (53%) and the mean age was 67.9 (SD 18.8) years. There were no differences in clinical or severity characteristics between the patients in the control group and the intervention group. Pressure injuries occurred in 35 patients, with a median time of 7 days (ITQ 4–10) from admission. The frequency of pressure injuries was higher in the control group (80.6%) compared to the intervention group (32.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions. Viscoelastic support surfaces reduced the incidence of pressure injuries in moderate or higher risk critically ill patients when compared to pyramidal support surfaces.

scholarly journals Randomized Clinical Trial: The Effect of Exercise of the Intrinsic Muscle on Foot Pronation

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (13) ◽  
pp. 4882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Pabón-Carrasco ◽  
Aurora Castro-Méndez ◽  
Samuel Vilar-Palomo ◽  
Ana María Jiménez-Cebrián ◽  
Irene García-Paya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Initial State ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Training Post ◽  
Foot Posture ◽  
Statics And Dynamics

Background: There is little scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of strengthening exercises on the foot’s intrinsic musculature in improving the lower limb on the statics and dynamics in healthy individuals. Method: To evaluate the effect on foot posture with regard to the reinforcement of the short foot exercise (SFE) compared to another without a recognized biomechanical action, which we called the “non-biomechanical function” (NBF) exercise. A randomized clinical trial was carried out with 85 asymptomatic participants with a bilateral Foot Posture Index (FPI) greater than 6 points. An experimental group (n = 42) did SFE training and a control group (n = 43) carried out NBF exercises. The foot posture was evaluated twice via the navicular drop (ND) test, and the FPI was assessed on the day of inclusion in the study (pre-intervention) and after four weeks of training (post-intervention). Results: Statistically significant values were not found in foot posture between the experimental and the control groups when comparing before and after the training. However, the foot posture was modified in both groups with respect to its initial state, and the ND value decreased. Conclusions: SFE could be considered a useful tool to deal with pathologies whose etiology includes excessive pronation of the foot.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document