Key Performance Indicators in Field Hospital Appraisal: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rouhollah Zaboli ◽  
Shahram Toufighi ◽  
Mohammad Raiess Zadeh ◽  
Rouhollah Ghaed Amini ◽  
Fatemeh Azizian
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Field Hospital

Measurements of workplace productivity in the office context: A systematic review and current industry insights

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bortoluzzi ◽  
D. Carey ◽  
J.J. McArthur ◽  
C. Menassa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Knowledge Worker ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Expert Interviews ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Productivity Measurement ◽  
The Past ◽  
Workplace Productivity ◽  
Comprehensive Survey

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive survey of workplace productivity key performance indicators used in the office context. Academic literature from the past ten years is systematically reviewed and contextualized through a series of expert interviews. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a systematic review of literature to identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and methods of workplace productivity measurement, complemented by insights semi-structured interviews to inform a framework for a benchmarking tool. 513 papers published since 2007 were considered, of which 98 full-length papers were reviewed, and 20 were found to provide significant insight and are summarized herein. Findings – Currently, no consensus exists on a single KPI suitable for measuring workplace productivity in an office environment, though qualitative questionnaires are more widely adopted than quantitative tools. The diversity of KPIs used in published studies indicates that a multidimensional approach would be most appropriate for knowledge-worker productivity measurement. Expert interviews further highlighted a shift from infrequent, detailed evaluation to frequent, simplified reporting across human resource functions and this context is important for future tool development. Originality/value – This paper provides a summary of significant work on workplace productivity measurement and KPI development over the past ten years. This follows up on the comprehensive review by B. Haynes (2007a), providing an updated perspective on research in this field with additional insights from expert interviews.

scholarly journals Using Logic Model and Key Performance Indicators to Construct A Field Hospital for Coronavirus Pandemic Cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alshehri Ali ◽  
Al Moteri Modi Owied ◽  
Plummer Virginia ◽  
Endacott Ruth ◽  
Al Thobaity Abdulellah
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Logic Model ◽  
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia ◽  
Field Hospital ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Hospital Construction ◽  
Model Components

Abstract Background. Field hospitals have been established as part of the COVID-19 pandemic response in a range of countries including the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Assess input, monitor activities and track output can be used to identify whether field hospitals are meeting their intended targets. Method. Based on a case study approach, the reported results include field hospital construction project performance outcomes, a description of the design process and the development and application of key performance indicators to assess field hospital efficacy.Result. Each of the logic model component (i.e. input, activities and output) has tailored indicators that address different aspects of field hospital; from the infrastructure work to the wider impacts on services.Conclusion. The logic model components and related KPIs can be extremely important in terms of providing insights into how to achieve the field hospital’s objectives.

scholarly journals Measurements of workplace productivity in the office context: A systematic review and current industry insights

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bortoluzzi ◽  
D. Carey ◽  
J.J. McArthur ◽  
C. Menassa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Knowledge Worker ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Expert Interviews ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Productivity Measurement ◽  
The Past ◽  
Workplace Productivity ◽  
Comprehensive Survey

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive survey of workplace productivity key performance indicators used in the office context. Academic literature from the past ten years is systematically reviewed and contextualized through a series of expert interviews. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a systematic review of literature to identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and methods of workplace productivity measurement, complemented by insights semi-structured interviews to inform a framework for a benchmarking tool. 513 papers published since 2007 were considered, of which 98 full-length papers were reviewed, and 20 were found to provide significant insight and are summarized herein. Findings – Currently, no consensus exists on a single KPI suitable for measuring workplace productivity in an office environment, though qualitative questionnaires are more widely adopted than quantitative tools. The diversity of KPIs used in published studies indicates that a multidimensional approach would be most appropriate for knowledge-worker productivity measurement. Expert interviews further highlighted a shift from infrequent, detailed evaluation to frequent, simplified reporting across human resource functions and this context is important for future tool development. Originality/value – This paper provides a summary of significant work on workplace productivity measurement and KPI development over the past ten years. This follows up on the comprehensive review by B. Haynes (2007a), providing an updated perspective on research in this field with additional insights from expert interviews.

The quality of smart mobility: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
Simon NAGY ◽  
Csaba CSISZÁR
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Smart Cities ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Monitoring Method ◽  
Smart Mobility

Smart cities and smart mobility are often analysed by systematic, sustainability-related, informatical, etc., issues. However, the quality elements of smart mobility services have not yet been reviewed. In this paper, we reviewed smart cities and smart mobility as well as the quality elements of smart mobility services. Based on the reviewed literature, we illustrated the requirements against smart mobility and uncovered the need for optimisation. We also interpret a monitoring method based on SERVQUAL. This method can be a base of establishing key performance indicators as well as benchmarking between cities.

Optimalisasi Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Melalui Pendekatan Balance Scorecard Upaya Mengimplementasikan Performance Management System (PMS) Pada Perguruan Tinggi

CCIT Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34
Author(s):  
Untung Rahardja ◽  
Muhamad Yusup Eva ◽  
Rosyifa Rosyifa
Keyword(s):  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Management System ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Individual Performance ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Performance Measurement System ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Successful Implementation

SQL Server Reporting Services is a way to analyze data, create reports using the indicators and gauges. Indicators are minimal gauges that convey the state of a single data value at a glance, and most are used to represent the state of Key Performance Indicators. Manage and harmonize the performance of an institution's educational institutions, especially universities with the performance of individuals or resources, no doubt is one of the essential elements for the success of an entity of the institution. Integrate the performance of an educational institution with individual performance is not an easy process, and therefore required a systematic approach to manage it. Implementation of a strategic management system based Balanced Scorecard can be used as a performance measurement system that will continuously monitor the successful implementation of the strategy of any public educational institution and measure the performance of its resources in a comprehensive and balanced, not the quantity but the emphasis is more concerned with the quality, so the performance of educational institutions at any time can be known clearly. Contribution of Key Performance Indicators to manage and harmonize the performance of any public institution is a solution in providing information to realize the extent of work that has set targets, identify and monitor measures of success, of course, with performance indicators show a clear, specific and measurable.

Strategic planning in grassland farming: Principles andapplications

1997 ◽  
pp. 191-197
Author(s):  
W.J. Parker ◽  
N.M. Shadbolt ◽  
D.I. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Strategic Plans ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Farm Business ◽  
Pastoral Farming ◽  
Financial Environment

Three levels of planning can be distinguished in grassland farming: strategic, tactical and operational. The purpose of strategic planning is to achieve a sustainable long-term fit of the farm business with its physical, social and financial environment. In pastoral farming, this essentially means developing plans that maximise and best match pasture growth with animal demand, while generating sufficient income to maintain or enhance farm resources and improvements, and attain personal and financial goals. Strategic plans relate to the whole farm business and are focused on the means to achieve future needs. They should be routinely (at least annually) reviewed and monitored for effectiveness through key performance indicators (e.g., Economic Farm Surplus) that enable progress toward goals to be measured in a timely and cost-effective manner. Failure to link strategy with control is likely to result in unfulfilled plans. Keywords: management, performance

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document