Spheres of Justice by Michael Walzer

1986 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 457-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Cohen ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Moore

This essay examines the ideas and influence of Michael Walzer’s Spheres of Justice. It argues that Walzer’s influence on the discipline has taken a different form than many other writers on justice, such as Rawls, where the central ideas have been taken up and argued about in essentially Rawlsian terms. Walzer’s influence has operated on different levels, of which we can distinguish at least three. There is a micro level, with numerous authors picking up fruitful ideas, lines of inquiries or suggestions, found in Walzer’s work, and appropriating them or using them to pursue further arguments. There is a more general social justice level, where ideas that are central to his understanding of social justice have been appropriated by diverse thinkers, often in quite different ways. He has been also influential on a very general, methodological level, where theorists have adopted his method and style of doing political theory.


Ethics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-333
Author(s):  
William A. Galston

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-126
Author(s):  
Michal Sládecek

This text discusses Walzer?e position in relation to liberalistic concepts of justice, inequality, citizenship and ethnocultural identity. Unlike liberals, Walzer emphasizes the importance of nonvolntary associations and duties caused by such association, just as social inequality, which is the result of belonging to ethnocultural group. The text also considers Walzer?s answers to critiques that his position implies moral relativism. As far as politics is concerned, Walzer?s position claims that ethical systems on which communities in liberal society rely, are liberalized enough, with accepted principles of fairness, tolerance and intergroup justice. These systems correspond to political "liberal consensus", which cannot be derived from prepolitical ethos.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-34
Author(s):  
Michel Forsé ◽  
Simon Langlois ◽  
Maxime Parodi

Sociologists from many countries have recently paid attention to measures of social justice sentiments. In doing so, they are following the lead of philosophers like John Rawls (1971) or Michael Walzer (1983), among many others, and are now studying the question of justice empirically. Do individuals evaluate justice from the perspective of equity (or fairness) like Rawls proposed? Do they conceptualize different spheres of justice like Walzer argued? Only empirical studies can provide answers to these questions and offer “grounded knowledge” (Boudon 2012) that is knowledge that connect philosophical concepts with the actions and thought of social actors, at least in contemporary democratic societies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document