scholarly journals Overview of the Shenzhen Emergency Medical Service Call Pattern

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuk Man Lo ◽  
Yi Min Yu ◽  
Lap Yip Larry Lee ◽  
Mi Ling Eliza Wong ◽  
Sek Ying Chair ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2B) ◽  
pp. 1379-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Matteson ◽  
Mathew W. McLean ◽  
Dawn B. Woodard ◽  
Shane G. Henderson

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung T Nguyen ◽  
Kasper G Lauridsen ◽  
Josephine Johnsen ◽  
Katrine B Bomholt ◽  
Bo Løfgren

Background: The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2015 basic life support (BLS) algorithm has been simplified compared with the ERC 2010 BLS algorithm. Simplification of resuscitation guidelines may facilitate learning and improve guidelines adherence. This study aimed to study BLS performance using ERC 2015 compared with ERC 2010 guidelines. Methods: This is an observational study including video recordings of laypersons being skill tested after participation in a standardized ERC BLS/AED course using either the simplified ERC 2015 or ERC 2010 guidelines. The endpoints were 1) performing all steps of the BLS/AED algorithm correctly, 2) remembering the sequence of actions of the BLS/AED algorithm, 3) time to emergency medical service call, 4) time to first chest compression and 5) time to first shock. Results: We analyzed videos of 100 laypersons (50 trained using the simplified 2015 guidelines and 50 trained using the 2010 guidelines). Overall, 78% and 62% correctly performed all of the steps of the 2015 and 2010 guidelines respectively (p=0.08), whereas 94% and 82% remembered the correct sequence of actions of the 2015 and 2010 algorithms, respectively (p=0.06). There was no significant difference between participants following the 2015 vs 2010 algorithms with respect to time to emergency medical service call (difference: 0 sec, (95% confidence interval (CI): -3; 2) P=0.70), time to first chest compression (difference: 0 sec, (95% CI: -3;3) P=1.00), and time to first shock (difference: 0 sec, (95% CI: -6; 7) P=0.90). Conclusion: Laypersons tends to better perform resuscitation and adhere to the BLS algorithm when using the simplified ERC 2015 guidelines compared to the 2010 Guidelines. There were however no differences in time to emergency medical service call, time to first chest compression and shock delivery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. A12.1-A12
Author(s):  
Kim Kirby ◽  
Sarah Voss ◽  
Emma Bird ◽  
Jonathan Benger

AimTo identify and appraise evidence relating to the features of an Emergency Medicine System call interaction that enable, or inhibit, an Emergency Medical Dispatcher’s recognition that a patient is in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, or at imminent risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.MethodsAll study designs were eligible for inclusion. Data sources included Medline, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, AMED and OpenGrey. Stakeholder resources were screened and experts in resuscitation were asked to review the studies identified. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Synthesis was completed using a segregated mixed research synthesis approach.ResultsTwenty-five studies were included in the review. ‘Recognition studies’ involving patients already in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest dominated this SMSR and challenges associated with recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were apparent. Four main themes were identified: Recognising abnormal/agonal breathing during the emergency call, Managing the emergency call, Emotional distress, Patient’s colour.ConclusionA dominant finding is the difficulty in recognising abnormal/agonal breathing during the Emergency Medical Service call. The interaction between the caller and the Emergency Medical Dispatcher is critical in the recognition of patients who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Emergency Medical Dispatchers adapt their approach to the Emergency Medical Service call, and regular training for Emergency Medical Dispatchers is recommended to optimise out-of-hospital cardiac arrest recognition. Further research is required with a focus on the Emergency Medical Service call interaction of patients who are alive at the time of the Emergency Medical Service call and who later deteriorate into OHCA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document