Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Cocaine Abuse–Associated Malignant Hypertension: Report of 2 Cases With Review of the Literature

2007 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
pp. 1817-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Gu ◽  
Guillermo A. Herrera

Abstract Cocaine is one of the most commonly used illicit drugs. Acute renal failure is an emergent complication in patients with acute cocaine intoxication. It is well known that rhabdomyolysis and vasoconstriction can be important pathogenetic mechanisms resulting in acute renal failure in these patients. Clinically, although cocaine abuse is associated with elevated blood pressure, persistent accelerated hypertension reaching levels diagnostic of malignant hypertension is uncommon. Cocaine-induced malignant hypertension associated with morphologic features of thrombotic macroangiopathy has been rarely mentioned in the literature. We report 2 cases of cocaine abuse–associated malignant hypertension with renal failure. Kidney biopsies revealed thrombotic microangiopathy with fibrinoid necrosis of arterioles and glomerular tufts. Cocaine-mediated endothelial injury and platelet activation may play important pathogenetic roles in cocaine abusers who develop acute renal failure and malignant hypertension.

Author(s):  
Caroline Whitworth ◽  
Stewart Fleming

Malignant hypertension (MH) is recognized clinically by elevated blood pressure together with retinal haemorrhages or exudates with or without papilloedema (grades III or IV hypertensive retinopathy); and may constitute a hypertensive emergency or crisis when complicated by evidence of end-organ damage including microangiopathic haemolysis, encephalopathy, left ventricular failure, and renal failure. Though reversible, it remains a significant cause of end-stage renal failure, and of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in developing countries.MH can complicate pre-existing hypertension arising from diverse aetiologies, but most commonly develops from essential hypertension. The absolute level of blood pressure appears not to be critical to the development of MH, but the rate of rise of blood pressure may well be relevant in the pathogenesis. The pathogenesis of this transformation remains unclear.The pathological hallmark of MH is the presence of fibrinoid necrosis (medial vascular smooth muscle cell necrosis and fibrin deposition within the intima) involving the resistance arterioles in many organs. Fibrinoid necrosis is not specific to MH and this appearance is seen in other conditions causing a thrombotic microangiopathy such as haemolytic uraemic syndrome, scleroderma renal crisis, antiphospholipid syndrome, and acute vascular rejection post transplant. MH can both cause a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) but can also complicate underlying conditions associated with TMA.The pathophysiological factors that interact to generate and sustain this condition remain poorly understood. Risk factors include Afro-Caribbean race, smoking history, younger age of onset of hypertension, previous pregnancy, and untreated hypertension associated with non-compliance or cessation of antihypertensive therapy.Evidence from clinical studies and animal models point to a central role for the intrarenal renin–angiotensin system (RAS) in MH; there is good evidence for renal vasoconstriction and activation of the renal paracrine RAS potentiating MH once established; however, there may also be a role in the predisposition of MH suggested by presence of increased risk conferred by an ACE gene polymorphism in humans and polymorphisms for both ACE and AT1 receptor in an animal model of spontaneous MH. Other vasoactive mediators such as the endothelin and the inflammatory response may be important contributing to and increasing endothelial damage. There have been no randomized controlled trials to define the best treatment approach, but progressive lowering of pressures over days is considered safest unless made more urgent by critical clinical state. It seems logical to introduce ACE inhibition cautiously and early, but in view of the risk of rapid pressure lowering some recommend delay.


Dermatology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 222 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Santos-Juanes ◽  
A. Esteve ◽  
A. Mas-Vidal ◽  
P. Coto-Segura ◽  
E. Salgueiro ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2304-2307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Reza Ardalan ◽  
R. Shane Tubbs ◽  
Sadegh Chinikar ◽  
Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-87
Author(s):  
Bethany A. Lynch ◽  
Peter Gal ◽  
J. Laurence Ransom ◽  
Rita Q. Carlos ◽  
Mary Ann V.T. Dimaguila ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Aminophylline is a methylxanthine with multiple physiologic actions. At low doses, aminophylline can antagonize adenosine and improve renal function via increased glomerular filtration rate. Despite its clinical use, little data exists in neonates for this indication. Therefore, the objective of this report is to describe the impact of aminophylline on renal function indices in a series of neonates with acute renal failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective chart review of 13 neonates with acute renal failure who received aminophylline during a 15-month study period. Aminophylline was administered at 1 mg/kg intravenously or orally every twelve hours. Forty-six percent (n = 6) of the patients received a 5 mg/kg loading dose before initiation of maintenance therapy. Most patients had already received other treatments for renal failure, including diuretics and dopamine. RESULTS Resolution of acute renal failure (with normalization of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen) was documented in 10 patients (77%). Four of the thirteen patients died from complications due to their prematurity. Failure of low-dose aminophylline was observed in 3 of the 4 patients who died. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose aminophylline in neonates with acute renal failure is associated with an improvement in renal function indices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 079-081
Author(s):  
Andriamiarimbola Irène Rakotoniaina ◽  
Miora Koloina Ranaivosoa ◽  
Annick Anjatiana Raherinaivo ◽  
Andry Rasamindrakotroka

The 24-hour urine proteinuria or albuminuria ratio is still prescribed for protein detection in urine, despite the fact that it has been replaced by the albuminuria or protein/creatininuria ratio. The use of this ratio eliminates the misinterpretation of 24-hour urine proteinuria. The objective of this development is to clarify the importance of the ratio for the search for albumin or protein in the urine. We conducted a review of the literature focusing on different diagnostic recommendations. Indeed, 24-hour urine collection is tedious and prone to many errors. The ratio is therefore a simple, reliable and standardized indicator for assessing proteinuria except in acute renal failure patients. The correlation between these ratios and 24-hour urine has been demonstrated in several studies in various populations and is currently considered to be the most adequate measure for proteinuria quantification despite the variability in creatinine excretion. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes recommendations therefore suggest the use of the albumin/creatinine ratio and the protein/creatinine ratio on a 1st morning urine sample to test for proteinuria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-214
Author(s):  
H.M. Villafuerte Ledesma ◽  
J.M. Peña Porta ◽  
P. Iñigo Gil ◽  
P. Martin Azara ◽  
J.E Ruiz Lalglesia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document