A study on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of plain fin-tube heat exchanger using CFD analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Liu ◽  
Jun-Kyu Yoon
Author(s):  
Sun-Joon Byun ◽  
Sang-Jae Lee ◽  
Jae-Min Cha ◽  
Zhen-Huan Wang ◽  
Young-Chul Kwon

This study presents the comparison of heat transfer capacity and pressure drop characteristics between a basic fin-tube heat exchanger and a modified heat exchanger with the structural change of branch tubes and coiled turbulators. All experiments were carried out using an air-enthalpy type calorimeter based on the method described in ASHRAE standards, under heat exchanger experimental conditions. 14 different kinds of heat exchangers were used for the experiment. Cooling and heating capacities of the turbulator heat exchanger were excellent, compared to the basic one. As the insertion ratio of the coiled turbulator and the number of row increased, the heat transfer performance increased. However, the capacity per unit area was more effective in 4 rows than 6 rows, and the cooling performance of the 6 row turbulator heat exchanger (100% turbulator insert ratio) was down to about 6% than that of 4 row one. As the water flow rate and the turbulator insertion ratio increased, the pressure drop of the water side increased. This trend was more pronounced in 6 rows. In the cooling condition, the pressure drop on the air side was slightly increased due to the generation of condensed water, but was insignificant under the heating condition. The power consumption of the pump was more affected by the water flow rate than the coiled turbulator. The equivalent hydraulic diameter of a tube by the turbulator was reduced and then the heat transfer performance was improved. Thus, the tube diameter was smaller, the heat flux was better.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 961-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Jool Kim ◽  
Ho-Jin Choi ◽  
Man-Yeong Ha ◽  
Seok-Ro Kim ◽  
Seon-Wook Bang

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Mahtab Alam ◽  
Dr. Dharmendra Singh Rajput

The main objective of the present work is to investigation of optimum design of plate fin tube heat exchanger using Computational fluid dynamic approach and maximizing thermal performance. There are total five designs of plate fin and tube heat exchanger are used in present work and CFD analysis have been performed in it to get maximum heat transfer. It has been observed from CFD analysis that the maximum heat transfer can be achieved from plate fin and tube heat exchanger with elliptical tube arrangement inclined at 30o with 23.22% more heat transfer capacity as compared to circular tube plate pin heat exchanger. So that it is recommended that if the plate fins and tube heat exchanger with inclined elliptical tube used in place of circular tube arrangement, batter heat transfer can be achieved.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swanand Gaikwad ◽  
Ashish Parmar

AbstractHeat exchangers possess a significant role in energy transmission and energy generation in most industries. In this work, a three-dimensional simulation has been carried out of a shell and tube heat exchanger (STHX) consisting of segmental baffles. The investigation involves using the commercial code of ANSYS CFX, which incorporates the modeling, meshing, and usage of the Finite Element Method to yield numerical results. Much work is available in the literature regarding the effect of baffle cut and baffle spacing as two different entities, but some uncertainty pertains when we discuss the combination of these two parameters. This study aims to find an appropriate mix of baffle cut and baffle spacing for the efficient functioning of a shell and tube heat exchanger. Two parameters are tested: the baffle cuts at 30, 35, 40% of the shell-inside diameter, and the baffle spacing’s to fit 6,8,10 baffles within the heat exchanger. The numerical results showed the role of the studied parameters on the shell side heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drop in the shell and tube heat exchanger. The investigation shows an increase in the shell side heat transfer coefficient of 13.13% when going from 6 to 8 baffle configuration and a 23.10% acclivity for the change of six baffles to 10, for a specific baffle cut. Evidence also shows a rise in the pressure drop with an increase in the baffle spacing from the ranges of 44–46.79%, which can be controlled by managing the baffle cut provided.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong-Yeon Yoo ◽  
Dong-Seong Park ◽  
Min-Ho Chung ◽  
Sang-Yun Lee

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 2949-2958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Won Hwang ◽  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
June Kee Min ◽  
Ji Hwan Jeong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document