scholarly journals Selection of a belt feeder drive group of crushing plant for ore/waste at the open pit of Veliki Krivelj mine

2012 ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Bojan Drobnjakovic ◽  
Dragan Milanovic ◽  
Vesna Drobnjakovic
Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3066
Author(s):  
Michał Patyk ◽  
Przemysław Bodziony ◽  
Zbigniew Krysa

Selection and assessment of mining equipment used in open pit rock mines relies chiefly on estimates of overall exploitation cost. The rational arrangement of mining equipment and systems comprising loading machines, haul trucks and crushing plants should be preceded by a thorough analysis of technical and economic aspects, such as investment outlays and the costs of further exploitation, which largely determine the costs of mining operations and the deposit value. Additionally, the operational parameters of the mining equipment ought to be considered. In this study, a universal set of evaluation criteria has been developed, and an evaluation method has been applied for the selection of surface mining equipment and the processing system to be operated in specific mining conditions, defined by the user. The objective of this study is to develop and apply the new methodology of multi-criteria selection of open pit rock mining equipment based on multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedures, to enable the optimization of loading, handling and crushing processes. The methodology, underpinned by the principles of MCDM, provides the dedicated ranking procedures, including the ELECTRE III. The applied methodology allows the alternative options (variants) to be ranked accordingly. Ultimately, a more universal methodology is developed, applicable in other surface mines where geological and mining conditions are similar. It may prove particularly useful in selection and performance assessment of mining equipment and process line configurations in mining of low-quality rock deposits. Therefore, we undertook to develop universal criteria and applications for the selection and performance assessment of process machines for surface mines, taking into account environmental aspects as well as deposit quality.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3200
Author(s):  
Branimir Farkaš ◽  
Ana Hrastov

Mining design is usually evaluated with different multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods when it comes to large open pit or underground ore mines, but it is not used on quarry sites. Since Croatia is mostly mining stone, the implementation of such methods in decision making of the quarry mine design is imperative but left out. In this paper, the PROMETHEE II and AHP decision-making methods are implemented on the quarry site to find out the best final quarry design contour. By implementing the MCDM methods, the best quarry model was chosen based on 22 different criteria parameters out of three final quarry designs. The chosen model is not only financially sound but also has the least environmental impact.


ASJ. ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (49) ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
I. Zharikov

The results of the analysis of the application of the methods of the theory of queuing for calculating the capacity of the receiving hopper of an open-pit crushing plant used in combination with a combined automobile-conveyor transport are presented. An analytical expression is given for calculating the capacity of the bunker, taking into account the minimum possible duration of the interval between unloading dump trucks into the bunker. The capacity of the receiving hopper of the crushing plant with a capacity of 4300 t / h was determined when working with dump trucks with a carrying capacity of up to 180 tons.


Author(s):  
Luis Miguel Rodríguez Vázquez ◽  
Ana Irán Prieto Valles ◽  
Ramón Silva Vázquez ◽  
Héctor Ávalos Loya ◽  
Eduardo Herrera Peraza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Pit ◽  

2013 ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Milenko Petrovic ◽  
Miljan Jaksic ◽  
Slobodan Miljojkovic
Keyword(s):  
Open Pit ◽  

Transport ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinar Mizrak Özfirat ◽  
Muharrem Kemal Özfirat ◽  
Tahir Malli

Coal produced in open pit mines should be moved to thermic power plants for production of power. Thermic power plants require very large amounts of coal. In transportation process of this coal, both costs and technical parameters should be considered. Common alternative transportation modes in this process are belt conveyors, truck types, suspension rail conveying systems, pipelines and railways. Selection of one of these modes is influenced by transportation distance, inclination of the haulage road, amount of coal reserve, investment costs, production capacity and unit production cost of the open pit mine. In this study, advantages and disadvantages of alternative transportation modes are analysed using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP). The results revealed, belt conveyors and trucks transportation by are superior to others.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-44
Author(s):  
Dariusz Fuksa ◽  
Beata Trzaskuś-Żak ◽  
Zdzisław Gałaś ◽  
Arkadiusz Utrata

Abstract In the practice of mining companies, the vast majority of them produce more than one product. The analysis of the break-even, which is referred to as CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit) analysis (Wilkinson, 2005; Czopek, 2003) in their case is significantly constricted, given the necessity to include multi-assortment structure in the analysis, which may have more than 20 types of assortments (depending on the grain size) in their offer, as in the case of open-pit mines. The article presents methods of evaluation of break-even (volume and value) for both a single-assortment production and a multi-assortment production. The complexity of problem of break-even evaluation for multi-assortment production has resulted in formation of many methods, and, simultaneously, various approaches to its analysis, especially differences in accounting fixed costs, which may be either totally accounted for among particular assortments, relating to the whole company or partially accounted for among particular assortments and partially relating to the company, as a whole. The evaluation of the chosen methods of break-even analysis, given the availability of data, was based on two examples of mining companies: an open-pit mine of rock materials and an underground hard coal mine. The selection of methods was set by the available data provided by the companies. The data for the analysis comes from internal documentation of the mines – financial statements, breakdowns and cost calculations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document