Achievement Tests in Primary Mathematics: Perpetuating Lower-Order Thinking

1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 4-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance Kamii ◽  
Barbara Ann Lewis

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (NCTM 1989) states that if we want to improve the nation's mathematics education, it is necessary to change the current method of evaluation that depends on standardized achievement tests. The National Research Council (1989) is even more explicit about the harmful effects of achievement testing.

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 508-514
Author(s):  
Joyce W. Bishop ◽  
Albert D. Otto ◽  
Cheryl A. Lubinski

The changing applications of mathematics have contributed to a shift from the perception that mathematics is a fixed body of arbitrary rules to the realization that the discipline is “a vigorous active science of patterns” (National Research Council 1989, p. 13). NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) recommends using patterns to promote mathematical understanding and, in particular, algebraic reasoning. A number of other mathematics education reform documents make similar recommendations (e.g., AAAS [1989]; National Research Council [1990]; Steen [1990]; NCTM [2000]). Researchers have begun to identify different approaches that students use to reason about patterns (Bishop 1997; MacGregor and Stacey 1993; Orton and Orton 1996; Stacey 1989). Research also shows that using students' thinking about patterns can help them develop a better understanding of mathematical concepts and the representations that reflect those concepts (Carey 1992; Fennema, Carpenter, and Peterson 1989). This article illustrates how students' thinking about geometric patterns can be used to help them develop algebraic reasoning and to make sense of mathematical notation and symbols.


1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 300-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Dorward ◽  
Steve Archibald

A major theme in calls for reform in mathematics education is the recognition of the need to connect the study of mathematics to the rest of the world (American Association for the Advancement of Science 1989; National Research Council 1991; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1989). For some, this connection is obvious. For many, however, mathematics is perceived as a set of rules and procedures that have little to do with everyday experience.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
SHAWN ANDRE SCOTT

The National Research Council defines problem gambling as a behaviour that does not meet the criteria for pathological gambling but results in harmful effects to gamblers and their social network. The study investigated disordered gambling including its characteristics and treatment strategies for special subgroups. The study used the descriptive research design including content analysis and interviews of key informants. Results showed little evidence about subgroup characteristics and special personal traits. The study concludes that affected and at-risk groups have not been adequately intervened directly.Keywords: Social Psychology, gambling, disordered gambling, at-risk groups, descriptivedesign, Philippines


1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 430-432
Author(s):  
Beatrice C. Babbitt ◽  
Virginia Usnick

In recent years, numerous reports have called for reform in American education in general and mathematics education in particular (e.g., Leitzel[1991]; NCTM [1991]; National Research Council [1989, 1990, 1991]). One suggested reform is revamping the curriculum to include mathematics more relevant to society and student current needs. In addition to changing the curriculum. these report have recommended changes in the method used to teach the curriculum. Among the suggested changes in methodology are an increased use of technology and opponunities for students to connect mathematical ideas.


1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-251
Author(s):  
Michael B. Fiske

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) (1989) presents a view of precollege mathematics t hat stresses the development of mathematical power. Framed within the context of students' needs, societal expectations, and engaging teaching, the Standards proposes to define the mathematical content of school mathematics. It responds to the crisis in mathematics education described in Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education (National Research Council 1989), A Nation at Risk (National Commission on Excellence in Education 1983), and Educating Americans for the 21st Century (National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology 1983). Although representing a consensus of mathematics educators, the Standards does not present a research basis for its recommendations (NCTM 1988) and thus at times stands at odds with the descriptive accounts of current mathematics teaching practices found in The Underachieving Curriculum (McKnight et al. 1987) and The Mathematics Report Card (Dossey, Mullis, Lindquist, and Chambers 1988). This article examines implications for teaching of explicit and implicit assumptions in the Standards and compares them with other views in the literature.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 542-549
Author(s):  
Bobbye Hoffman Bartels

Recent documents calling for reform in mathematics education stress promoting mathematical connections during instruction (NCTM 1989; National Research Council 1989, 1990). Mathematical connections are important because they link mathematical concepts to each other and to the real world. When teachers emphasize these connections during instruction, mathematics becomes less compartmentalized and more cohesive and has relevance to real life. In addition, stressing mathematical connections during instruction helps students develop better and deeper understandings of mathematics.


1992 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Judith Collison

The proliferation of information and information technology demands educational change, especially in mathematics. The emphasis must shift from mere acquisition to the use of information to deepen mathematical understanding and appreciation. The NCTM 's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (1989) envisions a new curriculum. Among its goals are the development of “mathematical power,” or “numeracy” (National Research Council 1989) and an appreciation of the beauty and power of mathematic (NCTM 1989). Mathematics instruction must not merely expand students' knowledge of mathematics but must also foster intellectual courage and a set of positive personal attitudes, or dispositions, that enable and empower students.


2005 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon D. Davis

From 1989 through 1991 the National Science Foundation (NSF) solicited proposals for curricula that would embody the goals set forth in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and other documents such as Everybody Counts (National Research Council 1989). Eventually thirteen curricula at the elementary, middle, and secondary levels were developed with funds from NSF (Senk & Thompson 2003). More than ten years later evidence is beginning to accrue that students enrolled in these Standardsbased curricula learn how to solve problems set within real-world contexts and do well on standardized tests that measure more traditional material (Senk & Thompson 2003).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document