The Calculator for Concept Formation: A Clinical Status Study

1981 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-338
Author(s):  
Merlyn J. Behr ◽  
Margariete Montague Wheeler

Kindergarten and first-grade children (N=30) used successive punches of a handheld calculator as a means for counting. Each child was presented 16 tasks in two individually videotaped interviews. Data concerning three questions were obtained: (a) Can children maintain a one-to-one correspondence between successive punches of a handheld calculator count and (i) an oral count, (ii) a manipulation of a set of objects, and (iii) a second calculator count?, (b) How do children account for an experimenter induced discrepancy in each of these correspondences?, and (c) With a calculator can children model counting strategies known to be used to process basic addition and subtraction facts? Data suggest an affirmative answer to each question. The authors conclude that it may be possible to facilitate a child's acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts by using the calculator to augment counting behaviors.

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 362-367
Author(s):  
Lisa Buchholz

Teaching the basic facts seemed like the logical thing to do. Wouldn't a study of the basic facts make mathematics computation much easier for my students in the future? How could I help my students memorize and internalize this seemingly rote information? How could I get rid of finger counting and move on to mental computation? As I embarked on my first year of teaching second grade following many years of teaching first grade, these questions rolled through my head.


1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 452-458
Author(s):  
Judith E. Hankes

Three students stand out vividly when recalling twenty years of teaching. The first one is Josh, a second grader who hail been labeled as educable mentally retarded by his kindergarten and first-grade teachers. Josh had serious problems with symbols. He could not memorize his addition and subtraction facts, and at times he seemed not to understand that the numeral 7 stood for the quantity seven.


Author(s):  
Eugene Matusov

I thought it would be relatively easy for me, with my six-year background of high school teaching and tutoring of math and physics, to co-op in the OC classroom with my first-grade son. I was both right and wrong. Indeed, my teaching experience and professional knowledge as a graduate student in child psychology helped me design activities suitable for first- and second-grade children. However, in terms of philosophy of teaching and organization of learning activities, my experience with traditional schooling was more harmful than helpful. My previous experience prepared me for delivering a lesson to a whole class or an individual. I was used to controlling children’s talk, which was supposed to be addressed only to me, and my students had learned early on in their schooling that they could talk legitimately only to the teacher and only when it was allowed by the teacher. The teacher was supposed to be the director, conductor, and main participant in classroom interaction. In the OC, I was shocked to discover that this traditional format of instruction was actively discouraged by teachers, co-opers, and children. This kind of teaching was not supported by the children in their interactions or by the classroom structure, with its small-group organization, children’s choice of groups, and nonsimultaneous rotation of the children from group to group. However, I did not know how to teach any other way. At the beginning of the school year I planned an activity that I called Magic Computer. It was designed to teach the reversibility of addition and subtraction as well as reading and computational skills, and it had worked beautifully with first- and second-graders in the past. The activity involved moving a paper strip that carried “computer commands” (“Think of a number. Add five to it. Take two away from it,” and so on) through an envelope with a window, to see one command at a time. The commands were designed so that addition and subtraction compensated for each other; therefore, the last message was “You have got your initial number!” The children’s job was to discover addition and subtraction combinations that cancel each other out and write them down on the paper strip, line by line.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Bermejo ◽  
Juan José Díaz

In this study, the incidence of the degree of abstraction in solving addition and subtraction problems with the unknown in the first term and in the result is analyzed. Ninety-six students from first grade to fourth grade in Primary Education (24 students per grade) solved arithmetic problems with objects, drawings, algorithms, and verbal problems. The participants were interviewed individually and all sessions were video-taped. The results indicate a different developmental pattern in achievement for each school grade depending on the levels of abstraction. The influence of the level of abstraction was significant, especially in first graders, and even more so in second graders, that is, at the developmental stage in which they start to learn these arithmetic tasks. Direct modeling strategies are observed more frequently at the concrete and pictorial level, counting strategies occur at all levels of abstraction, whereas numerical fact strategies are found at higher levels of abstraction.


1955 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
Mrs. Esther Instebo

Numbers Seemed To Become more real to my first graders last fall when we decided to use as counters the self-portraits we had made for open house. It was considered a privilege for one child to point to the portraits with a ruler while another tapped the actual person gently on the shoulder or head. This seemed to establish the one to one relationship so necessary in early rote counting. Each child watched intently to be sure he was tapped as his portrait was pointed out. T he port raits were so real to the children that taking daily attendance became a true number experience very quickly. The inevitable first grade chart story of “We have_______boys, We have girls, We have ________ children.” came easily because the children looked forward to counting their friends each day.


1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Frances Thompson

Students are introduced to two digit addition and subtraction during the second grade. This is their first encounter with the idea of regrouping in computation. Previous computation has been with singledigit numerals in the basic addition and subtraction facts. Much groundwork is necessary in numeration before students are introduced to twodigit computation. Students must have an understanding of how tens and ones are related in our base-ten notation. They need many varied experiences involving regrouping 10 ones for 1 ten or changing 1 ten for 10 ones before an algorithm is even introduced. But how to introduce the addition and subtraction algorithms effectively is the real problem.


1979 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Larry P. Leutzinger ◽  
Glenn Nelson

Counting by ones from one is a skill that children develop early and use in many situations. Primary-grade teachers encourage their students to count to find out how many objects are in a set. Such counting is helpful in determining answers to introductory addition and subtraction examples. After an understanding of these two operations has been developed and the basic addition and subtraction facts have been introduced, however, the “counting by ones from one” skill that children have can become a liability. Many students 6 use the method, since it almost guarantees a correct answer, but such counting is very inefficient if students use this method to find every answer.


1981 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Edward C. Rathmell ◽  
Larry P. Leutzinger

A major part of the instructional time devoted to mathematics in the primary grades involves helping children learn to count, read and write numerals, memorize basic addition and subtraction facts, add and subtract twodigit numbers, tell time, count money, and solve word problems. Since many able students already know or quickly learn these topics, primary teachers are faced with the problem of providing appropriate learning experiences for these children while the remainder of the class is learning them.


1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy K. Mack

Eight sixth-grade students received individualized instruction on addition and subtraction of fractions in a one-to-one setting for six weeks. Instruction was designed to build on the student's informal knowledge of fractions. All students possessed a rich store of informal knowledge of fractions that was based on partitioning units and treating the parts as whole numbers. Students' informal knowledge was initially disconnected from their knowledge of fraction symbols and procedures. Students related fraction symbols and procedures to their informal knowledge in ways that were meaningful to them; however, knowledge of rote procedures frequently interfered with students' attempts to build on their informal knowledge.


1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-280
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Carey

Twenty-four first-grade children were asked to write number sentences and select appropriate alternative number sentences for addition and subtraction word problems. Responses were qualitatively different across five clusters of children. Clusters were characterized by the degree of flexibility in accepting alternative number sentences for word problems. Children in all clusters could write and select open number sentences, such as a+□ =b and □ −a=b, that matched the semantic structure of problems for word problems with small and large numbers. Only the more advanced children could identify standard number sentences, a+b=□ and a−b=□, as appropriate representations for all addition and subtraction word problems. Flexibility in selecting alternative number sentences was related to number size, suggesting that knowledge of number relationships plays a role in the development of a general understanding of part-whole relationships.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document