The Thinking of Students: Creative Solutions to “Solve It!”: Animal Farm

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-129
Author(s):  
Edward S. Mooney

The student work included in this article illustrates the various ways that students were able to think outside the box, or pen, as they solved this meaty problem.

Author(s):  
Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari ◽  
Hartmut Koenitz

This paper describes an approach to facilitate innovation in game design by increasing the designers’ palette of playable and participatory computational expressions. The TOG model (Technology, Ontology, and Game Genre) can be used in teaching game design and related practices, but is also applicable to prototyping in professional settings. TOG is inspired by the processes of AI-based game design, and introduces the concept of the techno-artistic minimum. It was conceptualized when teaching a course on computational expression at Malta University. The main aim for teaching with the TOG model was to facilitate innovation by challenging aspiring game designers to think ‘outside the box’ and come up with unusual and innovate creative solutions. In addition, TOG can complement existing design methods such as MDA and DDT in the practice of professional game designers.


1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-147
Author(s):  
Alicia Newton-Hamill ◽  
Lura Goodhue Pierce

This department shares the thinking of middle school students as they explore and communicate mathematics. It will highlight students' work, including projects, investigations, or creative solutions to the problems in the monthly menu. Original student work will be included along with sufficient information about the activity so that readers can try the same ideas with their students. Please send articles and information for “The Thinking of Students” to the editor of the department: Karen Higgins, 28669 Royal Avenue, Eugene, OR 97402; home telephone (503) 688-1759. If readers need additional information, please include name, home address, home telephone number, and school name with the article. Please submit slides or photographs when possible. Submissions do not have to be in polished form, as the column can be written from the information the editor receives.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 241-245
Author(s):  
Eve Thrupp

Sometimes thinking outside the ‘box’ can help develop creative solutions by looking at situations from another point of view. Eve Thrupp shares her experience of developing a child-led intervention aimed at improving emotional resilience in primary school-aged children.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-478
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Crais ◽  
Melody Harrison Savage

Purpose The shortage of doctor of philosophy (PhD)–level applicants to fill academic and research positions in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) programs calls for a detailed examination of current CSD PhD educational practices and the generation of creative solutions. The intended purposes of the article are to encourage CSD faculty to examine their own PhD program practices and consider the perspectives of recent CSD PhD graduates in determining the need for possible modifications. Method The article describes the results of a survey of 240 CSD PhD graduates and their perceptions of the challenges and facilitators to completing a PhD degree; the quality of their preparation in research, teaching, and job readiness; and ways to improve PhD education. Results Two primary themes emerged from the data highlighting the need for “matchmaking.” The first time point of needed matchmaking is prior to entry among students, mentors, and expectations as well as between aspects of the program that can lead to students' success and graduation. The second important matchmaking need is between the actual PhD preparation and the realities of the graduates' career expectations, and those placed on graduates by their employers. Conclusions Within both themes, graduate's perspectives and suggestions to help guide future doctoral preparation are highlighted. The graduates' recommendations could be used by CSD PhD program faculty to enhance the quality of their program and the likelihood of student success and completion. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11991480


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document