scholarly journals Fluid Loss under Pressure – Inter- and Intraindividual Variability and Relation to Diving Parameters in SCUBA Divers

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 236-240
Author(s):  
T Fichtner ◽  
A Chekhanova ◽  
A Wuensche ◽  
HJ Starkloff ◽  
T Fieback ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Nesselroade

A focus on the study of development and other kinds of changes in the whole individual has been one of the hallmarks of research by Magnusson and his colleagues. A number of different approaches emphasize this individual focus in their respective ways. This presentation focuses on intraindividual variability stemming from Cattell's P-technique factor analytic proposals, making several refinements to make it more tractable from a research design standpoint and more appropriate from a statistical analysis perspective. The associated methods make it possible to study intraindividual variability both within and between individuals. An empirical example is used to illustrate the procedure.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aire Mill ◽  
Anu Realo ◽  
Jüri Allik

Abstract. Intraindividual variability, along with the more frequently studied between-person variability, has been argued to be one of the basic building blocks of emotional experience. The aim of the current study is to examine whether intraindividual variability in affect predicts tiredness in daily life. Intraindividual variability in affect was studied with the experience sampling method in a group of 110 participants (aged between 19 and 84 years) during 14 consecutive days on seven randomly determined occasions per day. The results suggest that affect variability is a stable construct over time and situations. Our findings also demonstrate that intraindividual variability in affect has a unique role in predicting increased levels of tiredness at the momentary level as well at the level of individuals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 892-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Shalom ◽  
Eva Gilboa-Schechtman ◽  
Dana Atzil-Slonim ◽  
Eran Bar-Kalifa ◽  
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Narad ◽  
Tanya N. Antonini ◽  
Amanda Graham ◽  
Bill Brinkman ◽  
Paul Rosen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (07) ◽  
pp. 155-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amparo Vayá ◽  
Marcial Martínez ◽  
Carmen Ortuño ◽  
José Mª López ◽  
Justo Aznar

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (02) ◽  
pp. 256-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nghia D Nguyen ◽  
Habib Ghaddar ◽  
Valarie Stinson ◽  
Lloyd E Chambless ◽  
Kenneth K Wu ◽  
...  

SummaryWe have recently reported the short-term intraindividual variability of several coagulation factors and inhibitors included in the ARIC study (Chambless et al. Ann Epidemiol 1992; 2:723). In this paper, we reported the intraindividual variability results of additional hemostatic factors. Blood samples were collected for hemostatic assays three times at 1-2-week intervals from 39 subjects recruited from 4 ARIC field centers. The contributions of within-person, processing and assay (designated “method”) and between-person variances to the total variance were estimated and from them the reliability coefficient, R, was computed as the proportion of total variance in the between-person component. The R value was high for (β-thromboglobulin and tissue- plasminogen activator: 0.83 and 0.81, respectively; and intermediate for D-dimer and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1: 0.73 and 0.72, respectively. Protein S (total and free) and platelet factor 4 had low repeatability (R<0.50) derived mostly from “method” variability while low R value (0.03) for fibrinopeptide A was attributed to high “method” and “within-person” variability. Gender, age and the level of hemostatic factors did not influence the intraindividual variability.


Author(s):  
R.R. Sagitov ◽  
◽  
K.M. Minaev ◽  
A.S. Zakharov ◽  
A.S. Korolev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document