scholarly journals New Developments in the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (5S) ◽  
pp. 773-776
Author(s):  
Celestia S. Higano

During the past 4 years, a host of new agents have been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. As a result, selecting the right agent for the right patient at the right time is a clinical challenge. At the NCCN 19th Annual Conference, Dr. Celestia Higano explored the rationale behind such therapeutic decisions and the supporting clinical trial data. She reviewed the different classes of therapeutic agents, from immunotherapy and hormonal therapies to chemotherapy and radioisotopes, and offered suggestions for the clinical scenarios in which they may be used most successfully.

Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Martin Bögemann ◽  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Neal Shore

Abstract Background Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a rising prostate-specific antigen concentration, despite castrate levels of testosterone with ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy or orchiectomy, and no detectable metastases by conventional imaging. Patients with nmCRPC progress to metastatic disease and are at risk of developing cancer-related symptoms and morbidity, eventually dying of their disease. While patients with nmCRPC are generally asymptomatic from their disease, they are often older and have chronic comorbidities that require long-term concomitant medication. Therefore, careful consideration of the benefit–risk profile of potential treatments is required. Methods In this review, we will discuss the rationale for early treatment of patients with nmCRPC to delay metastatic progression and prolong survival, as well as the factors influencing this treatment decision. We will focus on oral pharmacotherapy with the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, and the importance of balancing the clinical benefit they offer with potential adverse events and the consequential impact on quality of life, physical capacity, and cognitive function. Results and conclusions While the definition of nmCRPC is well established, the advent of next-generation imaging techniques capable of detecting hitherto undetectable oligometastatic disease in patients with nmCRPC has fostered debate on the criteria that inform the management of these patients. However, despite these developments, published consensus statements have maintained that the absence of metastases on conventional imaging suffices to guide such therapeutic decisions. In addition, the prolonged metastasis-free survival and recently reported positive overall survival outcomes of the three second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors have provided further evidence for the early use of these agents in patients with nmCRPC in order to delay metastases and prolong survival. Here, we discuss the benefit–risk profiles of apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide based on the data available from their pivotal clinical trials in patients with nmCRPC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Manini ◽  
Alba González ◽  
David Büchser ◽  
Jorge García-Olaverri ◽  
Arantza Urresola ◽  
...  

The clinical parameters and the histological and immunohistochemical findings of a prospective protocolized series of 27 prostate carcinoma patients with oligometastatic disease followed homogeneously were analyzed. Lymph nodes (81.5%) and bones (18.5%) were the only metastatic sites. Local control after metastatic directed treatment was achieved in 22 (81.5%) patients. A total of 8 (29.6%) patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer. Seventeen (63%) patients presented with non-organ confined disease. The Gleason index 8–10 was the most frequently observed (12 cases, 44.4%) combined grade. Positive immunostainings were detected with androgen receptor (100%), PGP 9.5 (74%), ERG (40.7%), chromogranin A (29.6%), and synaptophysin (18.5%) antibodies. The Ki-67 index value > 5% was observed in 15% of the cases. L1CAM immunostaining was negative in all cases. Fisher exact test showed that successful local control of metastases was associated to mild inflammation, organ confined disease, Ki-67 index < 5%, and Gleason index 3 + 3. A castration resistant status was associated with severe inflammation, atrophy, a Gleason index higher than 3 + 3, Ki-67 index ≥ 5%, and positive PGP 9.5, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin immunostainings. In conclusion, oligometastatic prostate adenocarcinoma does not have a specific clinical-pathologic profile. However, some histologic and immunohistochemical parameters of routine use may help with making therapeutic decisions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 708-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Sharifi

Abstract The decades-old terminology of androgen independence has been replaced in recent years with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Biological and clinical evidence have together conspired to support the use of this revised terminology by demonstrating that in the vast majority of cases tumors are neither truly depleted of androgens, nor are they free of the requirement for androgens to sustain growth and progression. Abiraterone acetate, an androgen synthesis inhibitor, and enzalutamide, a potent androgen receptor antagonist, both exploit the continued requirement for androgens. A central question, given the therapeutic gains enabled by further suppression of the androgen axis with these newer agents, is whether there may be additional clinical benefit gained by moving the goal posts of androgen suppression even further. The answer lies in part with the mechanisms utilized by tumors that enable resistance to these therapies. The aims of this review were to give a broad outline of steroidogenesis in prostate cancer and to highlight recent developments in understanding resistance to hormonal therapies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
Vahan Kassabian ◽  
Scott Flanders ◽  
Samuel Wilson ◽  
Bruce A. Brown ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
...  

229 Background: Enzalutamide (ENZA) and abiraterone acetate (ABI) are approved hormonal therapies for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study assessed real-world treatment duration and utilization patterns in patients receiving ENZA or ABI. Methods: Adult mCRPC patients initiating ENZA or ABI before or after cytotoxic chemotherapy were identified from the Truven MarketScan® claims database (2012–2015). The index date was the first initiation of ENZA or ABI; continuous insurance enrollment for ≥6 months prior to and ≥3 months after the index date was required. Treatment discontinuation was defined as a prescription gap of ≥45 days. Median treatment duration was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment switching was defined as starting a new mCRPC-related therapy within 30 days before to 45 days after the discontinuation date. Analyses were separately conducted for chemo-naïve and chemo-experienced patients. Results: The study included 3230 chemo-naive (ENZA 920; ABI 2310) and 692 chemo-experienced patients (ENZA 262; ABI 430). Among chemo-naive patients, ENZA cohort was older (mean age 74.5 vs 73.5; p = 0.013), with a higher proportion of comorbidities vs ABI cohort. Treatment duration was longer for ENZA cohort than ABI cohort (log-rank p = 0.008; median = ENZA 10.7 vs ABI 8.8 months). Within 1 year of initiation, 55.7% of ENZA and 60.8% of ABI cohort discontinued treatment and 22.5% and 34.7%, respectively, switched to other mCRPC therapies. Results were consistent among subgroups with specific comorbidities. Treatment duration was shorter among chemo-experienced patients than chemo-naïve; the difference between ENZA vs ABI among chemo-experienced patients was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.255; median = ENZA 7.5 vs ABI 7.1 months). Conclusions: Despite a more complex profile at baseline, chemo-naive mCRPC patients in the ENZA cohort had a longer treatment duration and lower proportion of switching to other prostate-cancer-directed therapies vs the ABI cohort. The difference of treatment duration between the two cohorts was not statistically significant for chemo-experienced patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretschmer ◽  
Roderick C. N. van den Bergh ◽  
Alberto Martini ◽  
Giancarlo Marra ◽  
Massimo Valerio ◽  
...  

With the therapeutic landscape of advanced prostate cancer rapidly evolving and oncological benefits being shown for a plethora of new agents and indications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL)-associated evidence is still subpar. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of HRQOL for patients with advanced PC (metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)), and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate HRQOL in recent randomized trials. Furthermore, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use in clinical practice, as well as potential strategies for improvement of HRQOL evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Sreevalsa Appukkuttan ◽  
Ronald E. Aubert ◽  
Jeffrey Weiss ◽  
Joy Wang ◽  
...  

180 Background: Radium-223 (RA-223) is the first FDA approved targeted alpha therapy that significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with symptomatic bone metastases. There is limited real world data describing RA-223 current use. Methods: A retrospective patient chart review was done of men who received at least 1 cycle of Ra-223 for mCRPC in 10 centers throughout the US (4 academic, 6 private practices). All pts had a minimum follow-up of 4 months, or placed in hospice or death. Descriptive analyses for clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were performed. Results: Among the 200 pts (mean age-73.6 years, mean Charlson comorbidity index-6.9) RA-223 was initiated on average 1.6 years from mCRPC diagnosis (first line use (1L)=38.5%, 2L=31.5% and ≥3L=30%). 78% completed 5-6 cycles of RA-223 with mean therapy duration of 4.2 months. Among all pts, 43% received RA-223 as monotherapy (no overlap with other mCRPC therapies) while 57% had combination therapy with either abiraterone or enzalutamide. Median OS following RA-223 initiation was 21.2 months (95% CI 19.6- 29.2). Table provides the RA-223 utilization by type of clinical practice. Conclusions: Utilization of RA-223 in this real world data set was distinct from clinical trial data. Most patients received RA-223 in combination with abiraterone or enzalutamide, therapies that were unavailable when the pilot trial was conducted. Median survival was 21.2 months. Real world use of RA-223 has evolved as newer agents have become FDA approved in bone-metastatic CRPC. Academic and community patterns of practice were more similar than distinct. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS336-TPS336
Author(s):  
David Johnson Einstein ◽  
Atish Dipankar Choudhury ◽  
Philip James Saylor ◽  
Lillian Werner ◽  
Mark G. Erlander ◽  
...  

TPS336 Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although abiraterone (abi) in either the castration-sensitive or castration-resistant setting increases survival, resistance is universal and limits the efficacy of subsequent hormonal therapies. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that regulates mitotic functions and promotes the progression of cells through mitosis, and it is highly upregulated in prostate cancer following castration. PLK1 inhibition enhances the efficacy of abi in cell line models as well as patient-derived tumor xenografts via several mechanisms. Onvansertib (PCM-075; Trovagene, Inc.) is the first orally available PLK1-specific inhibitor. In phase 1 testing, onvansertib demonstrated a manageable safety profile, with transient hematologic effects as its most prominent, yet reversible, toxicity. Methods: The goal of this phase 2 study (NCT03414034) is to observe the effects of onvansertib in combination with abi + prednisone on disease control, as assessed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline or stabilization after 12 weeks of study treatment, in subjects with mCRPC and early resistance to abi. Patients will be enrolled at time of PSA progression while on standard abi. A completed 3-patient safety lead-in phase tested the safety of the combination of onvansertib with abi, and the accruing expansion phase will treat 29 more patients with onvansertib (24 mg/m2 orally on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle) plus abi (administered orally and continuously once daily with prednisone) until time of radiographic or symptomatic progression. With 32 patients, there will be 90% power to detect a change in disease-control rate from 10% (null) to 30% (alternative). Based on a Simon’s two-stage optimal design, the study will terminate early if < 2 of the first 13 patients achieve disease control. Exploratory analyses include evaluations of predictive genomic biomarkers in circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA, including alterations of oncogenes and tumor suppressors implicated in PLK1 sensitivity within preclinical models. Clinical trial information: NCT03414034.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document