scholarly journals Cetuximab in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1S) ◽  
pp. 1-80
Author(s):  
Carlo Barone ◽  
Andrea Belisari ◽  
Fortunato Ciardiello ◽  
Lorenzo Mantovani ◽  
Lucia D’Angiolella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kras Status ◽  
First Line Treatment

The present health technology assessment report evaluates the clinical and economic profile of cetuximab in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Italy. The first part of the report addresses the epidemiological, clinical, social and economic impact of mCRC. In the second part, evidence of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab and its available alternatives is shown. Finally, a model-based economic evaluation aimed at comparing cetuximab-based re­gimens vs. alternative therapeutic strategies indicated in mCRC in Italy is presented. The model estimates the incremental cost-effectiveness of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 or FOLFIRI based on KRAS status, vs. adding bevacizumab to FOLFOX-4 or vs. FOLFOX-4 or FOLFIRI alone. A theoretical analysis vs. panitumumab has also been performed, despite panitumumab is not yet reimbursed in Italy in first-line mCRC. Survival outcomes, quality of life and costs of patient ma­nagement are estimated through a Markov model, using the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective, over a 10 year period, taking into account KRAS status of patients. The results of the pharmaco-economic analysis show that cetuximab + FOLFOX-4 and cetuximab + FOLFIRI are associated with increased survival, increased cost and increased quality adjusted survival, compared to all other treatments currently indicated and reimbursed in Italy. Adding cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 or FOLFIRI, based on KRAS status shows favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) vs. adding bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or vs. FOLFOX-4 or FOLFIRI alone. ICER of cetuximab (in combination with FOLFOX-4 or FOLFIRI), compared to currently reimbursed alternatives, is estimated between 6 and 13 thousand Euros per QALY gai­ned, depending on alternative treatment. These estimates are robust in extensive sensitivity analyses. As a final result, both clinical and economic evidence analyzed in this health technology assessment leads to recommend cetuximab as preferred option for the first-line treatment of mCRC KRAS wild-type patients in Italy.

Dacomitinib in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost–effectiveness analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Aguilar-Serra ◽  
Vicente Gimeno-Ballester ◽  
Alfonso Pastor-Clerigues ◽  
Javier Milara ◽  
Ezequiel Marti-Bonmati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
First Line ◽  
Estimate Quality ◽  
The Cost ◽  
First Line Treatment

Aim: To assess the cost–effectiveness of first-line treatment with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib in patients newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC EGFR-positive in the context of Spain. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was developed including costs, utilities and disutilities to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost–effectiveness ratio when treating with dacomitinib versus gefitinib. Results: Dacomitinib presented higher QALYs (0.51) compared with gefitinib (0.45). Dacomitinib costs were €33,061 in comparison with €26,692 for gefitinib arm. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio of €111,048 was obtained for dacomitinib. Conclusion: Dacomitinib was more effective in terms of QALYs gained than gefitinib. However, to obtain a cost–effectiveness alternative, a discount greater than 25% in dacomitinib acquisition cost is required.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e030738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huijuan Wang ◽  
Lingfei Huang ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Zhengyi Zhu ◽  
Weifeng Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

ObjectivesCetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) is superior to FOLFOX-4 alone as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS wild-type (RAS wt mCRC), with significantly improved survival benefit by TAILOR, an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase III trial. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of these two regimens remains uncertain. The following study aims to determine whether cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is a cost-effective regimen for patients with specific RAS wt mCRC in China.DesignA cost-effectiveness model combined decision tree and Markov model was built to simulate pateints with RAS wt mCRC based on health states of dead, progressive and stable. The health outcomes from the TAILOR trial and utilities from published data were used respectively. Costs were calculated with reference to the Chinese societal perspective. The robustness of the results was evaluated by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ParticipantsThe included patients were newly diagnosed Chinese patients with fully RAS wt mCRC.InterventionsFirst-line treatment with either cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 or FOLFOX-4.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes are costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsBaseline analysis disclosed that the QALYs was increased by 0.383 caused by additional cetuximab, while an increase of US$62 947 was observed in relation to FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy. The ICER was US$164 044 per QALY, which exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$28 106 per QALY.ConclusionsDespite the survival benefit, cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is not a cost-effective treatment for the first-line regime of patients with RAS wt mCRC in China.Trial registration numberTAILOR trial (NCT01228734); Post-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document