scholarly journals Application of HPV DNA Testing in Follow-up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures in Northern Thailand

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 6093-6097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surapan Khunamornpong ◽  
Jongkolnee Settakorn ◽  
Kornkanok Sukpan ◽  
Chumnan Kietpeerakool ◽  
Charuwan Tantipalakorn ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surapan Khunamornpong ◽  
Jongkolnee Settakorn ◽  
Kornkanok Sukpan ◽  
Suree Lekawanvijit ◽  
Narisara Katruang ◽  
...  

Objective. To evaluate the performance of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing in urine samples compared to that of cervical sample testing in Northern Thailand. Methods. Paired urine and cervical samples were collected during the follow-up of women with a previous positive HPV test. HPV testing was performed using the Cobas 4800 HPV Test. Linear Array assay was used for genotyping in selected cases. Results. Paired urine and cervical samples were obtained from 168 women. Of 123 paired samples with valid results, agreement in the detection of high-risk HPV DNA was present in 106 cases (86.2%), with a kappa statistic of 0.65 (substantial agreement). Using the cervical HPV results as a reference, the sensitivity of urine HPV testing was 68.6% (24/35) and the specificity 93.2% (82/88). For the detection of histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), the sensitivity of urine HPV testing was 80.0% (4/5) and the specificity 78.0% (92/118). Conclusion. Although urine HPV testing had a rather low sensitivity for HPV detection, its sensitivity for histologic HSIL+ detection was high. For clinical use of urine HPV testing, standardization of specimen collection and processing techniques or application of a more sensitive test, especially in the detection of HPV52 and HPV58, is necessary.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
Marilyn Dawlett ◽  
Teresa Kologinczak ◽  
Jian-Ping Wang ◽  
Nour Sneige ◽  
Therese Bevers ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e90023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Persson ◽  
K. Miriam Elfström ◽  
Sophia Brismar Wendel ◽  
Elisabete Weiderpass ◽  
Sonia Andersson

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
_ _

Cervical carcinoma remains a health issue for women worldwide. Cervical cytology screening is the current method for early detection, and the NCCN Cervical Cancer Screening Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology provide direction for evaluating and managing this process, including clarified and revised recommendations on screening techniques and intervals and follow-up of abnormal screening results, including colposcopy. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for primary cervical cancer has been approved by the FDA, and HPV DNA testing for high-risk virus types can also be used as a component of both primary screening and workup of abnormal cytology results. Colposcopy, along with colposcopically directed biopsies, has become the primary method for evaluating women with abnormal cervical cytologies. Special considerations for colposcopy performed during pregnancy are also discussed. For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Vorsters ◽  
Severien Van Keer ◽  
Samantha Biesmans ◽  
Annick Hens ◽  
Ilse De Coster ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ziemke

Objective: Immunochemical detection of the protein p16INK4a in cervical cytology is used in combination with Ki-67. Cells positive for both proteins are certain to have been transformed by high-risk HPV. p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry provides a significant improvement in specificity over cytology and HPV DNA testing. However, p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry also has its limitations. Study Design: The research is based on the follow-up of 1,131 patients for whom p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry was performed with cytology. Dependencies on the age of patients with LSIL, number of p16/Ki-67-positive cells, and different results during repeated examinations were analyzed. Results: In LSIL, positive p16/Ki-67 is less specific for ≥CIN2/HSIL for patients younger than 30 years compared to patients aged 30 years or older (61.1 vs. 75.7%, p < 0.013). Using a score of 10 p16/Ki-67-marked cells as a positive result instead of 1 led to significantly higher specificity (89.0 vs. 70.2%, p < 0.001). This modified threshold offers better risk assessment in LSIL. In repeated immunocytochemical investigations, 28.4% of the results deviated from the first examination. Conclusion: The abovementioned discrepancies can be interpreted as hints about the molecular biological causes of suboptimal performance of p16/Ki-67. An efficient and reliable application of p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry requires knowledge of its methodological limitations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document